TUGAS&KELOMPOK&HUKUM&LINGKUNGAN&

1.! Ketentuan&Umum:&
a.! Makalah"dikumpulkan"tepat"pada"waktunya,"yaitu"pada"saat"presentasi.""
b.! Penilaian"didasarkan"pada:"
•! Kemampuan"memberikan"analisa"kritis"atas"pertimbangan"hakim"
•! Kemampuan"memberikan"analisa"kritis"atas"putusan"hakim"
c.! Tidak" perlu" secara" panjang" lebar" menjelaskan:" duduk" perkara," para" pihak," kutipan"
putusan"
d.! Makalah"sebagian"besar"berisi"analisis,"dan"bukan"kutipan"putusan"hakim."
e.! Makalah"setidaknya"memuat"jawaban"atas"beberapa"pertanyaan/fokus"pembahasan"
yang"diminta."
f.! Semua" referensi" yang" diwajibkan" harus" digunakan" dalam" analisa," dan" bukan" hanya"
dicantumkan"dalam"daftar"pustaka."
g.! Referensi" yang" dicantumkan" dalam" makalah," harus" benarCbenar" digunakan" untuk"
menganalisa."
h.! Referensi"minimal"5"literatur"(setidaknya"memuat"literatur"yang"dianjurkan)."
i.! Literatur"yang"dianjurkan"dapat"diambil"di"Bidang"Studi"HAN."
"
2.! Kasus& PTUN:& Pencemaran& Sungai& Cikijing! (Putusan& PTUN& Bandung& No.&
178/G/2015/PTUNKBDG,&Walhi,!dkk.!v.!Menteri!KLH,!dkk.,&2015)&
a.! Dikumpulkan"tanggal:"21/11/17"(kelas"reguler/paralel),"24/11/2017"(kelas"KKI)"
b.! Fokus"pembahasan"pada"analisa"kritis"atas"pertimbangan/putusan"hakim"terkait:"
C! Sudah"tepatkah"penggunaan"hak"gugat"oleh"penggugat"dalam"kasus"ini?"Sudah"
tepatkah"pendapat"hakim"atas"hak"gugat"para"penggugat?"
C! Bagaimana" pandangan" para" pihak" mengenai" kewenangan" tergugat"
mengeluarkan"objek"sengketa?""Bagaimana"pendapat"Anda?"
C! Bagaimana"pendapat"para"pihak"dan"hakim"mengenai"hubungan"antara"Amdal,"
izin" pembuangan" limbah" (IPLC)," pencemaran" air," baku" mutu" air," baku" mutu" air"
limbah," dan" daya" tampung" beban" pencemaran" (DTBP)." " Bagaimana" pendapat"
Anda?"
C! Bandingkan" hubungannya" antara" IPLC," DTBP," dan" baku" mutu" dengan" effluent'
standard,"water"quality"standard,"total"daily"maximum"load"(TDML)"di"AS."""""
c.! Referensi"yang"digunakan"setidaknya"berikut"ini:"
C! Robert"W."Adler","“Integrated"approaches"to"water"pollution:"Lessons"from"the"
Clean" Air" Act”," Harvard' Environmental' Law' Review," Vol." 23(1)," 1999," hal." 202C
295."
C! Robert"L."Glicksman"dan"Matthew"R."Batzel,"“Science,"Politics,"Law,"and"the"Arc"
of"the"Clean"Water"Act:"The"Role"of"Assumptions"in"the"Adoption"of"a"Pollution"
Control" Landmark”," Washington' University' ' Journal' of' ' Law' &' Policy," Vol." 32,"
2010,"hal."99C138."

1"

"
"
3.! Kasus& Perdata:& Kasus& Kalista& Alam& (Putusan& MA& No.& 651& K/Pdt/2015,& Menteri! LH! v.!
Kalista!Alam,&2015)&
a.! Dikumpulkan"tanggal:"28/11/17"(kelas"reguler/paralel),"dan"01/12/2017"(kelas"KKI)"
b.! Fokus"pembahasan"pada"analisa"kritis"atas"pertanyaan"berikut"ini:"
C! Bagaimana" para" pihak" mengartikan" serta" membuktikan" unsurCunsur" PMH" dan"
Strict'liability?"
C! Berikan" kritik" saudara" atas" didalilkannya" unsur" kesengajaan." " Berikan" pula"
komentar"saudara"atas"pertimbangan"hakim"mengenai"kesengajaan/kelalaian."
C! Mengapa" penggugat" meminta" agar" hakim" merujuk" pada" Putusan"
Mandalawangi?""Bagaimana"pendapat"hakim"atas"hal"ini?""Bagaimana"pendapat"
anda?"
C! Berikan"kritik"anda"terkait"penggunaan""dan"penafsiran"doktrin"res'ipsa'loquitur."
C! Berikan" kritik" anda" terkait" penggunaan" dan" penafsiran" precautionary' principle'
dalam"kasus"ini."
C! Berikan"komentar"anda"terkait"penghitungan"kerugian."""
c.! Referensi"yang"digunakan"setidaknya"berikut"ini:"
C! William" K." Jones," “Strict" Liability" for" Hazardous" Enterprise”," Columbia' Law'
Review,"Vol."92,"1705C1779"(1992)""
C! Vernon" Palmer," “A" General" Theory" of" the" Inner" Structure" of" Strict" Liability:"
Common" Law," Civil" Law," and" Comparative" Law”," " Tulane' Law' Review," Vol." 62"
(1988)"
C! Elizabeth" van" Schilfgaarde," “Negligence" under" the" Netherlands" Civil" Code:" An"
Economic" Analysist”," California' Western' International' Law' Journal," Vol." 21"
(1991)."
C! Vivienne" Harpwood," Principles' Of' Tort' Law," 4th" Ed." (London:" Cavendish"
Publishing,"2000)—[terutama"subCbab"terkait"strict'liability"("1.9"dan"11.13)"dan"
sub"bab"terkait"res'ipsa'loquitur"(7.3,"7.4.,"dan"7.5).'"!"eKbook&bisa&di&download"
&
4.! Kasus& Pidana:& PT.& Adei& Plantation& (Putusan& PN& Pelalawan& No.& 228/Pid.Sus/2013/PN&
Plw,&Terdakwa!PT.!Adei!Plantation,&2014)&
a.! Dikumpulkan"tanggal:"04/12/2017"(kelas"reguler/paralel),"dan"07/12/2017"(kelas"KKI)"
b.! Fokus" pembahasan" pada" analisa" kritis" atas" pertimbangan/putusan" hakim" dengan"
menjawab"pertanyaan:"
C! Bagaimana" penentuan" terdakwa" oleh" Jaksa?" " Bagaimana" pendapat" hakim" atas"
penentuan"terdakwa"ini?""
C! Sudah" tepatkah" penentuan" terdakwa" apabila" ditinjau" dari" teori" tentang"
pertanggungjawaban" pidana" korporasi?" " " " Kaitkan" ulasan" kasus" ini" dengan"
pembedaan" antara" tindak" pidana" korporasi" dan" konsep" penyertaan" menurut"
KUHP"

2"

"
 C! Bagaimana" komentar" anda" atas" kesimpulan/pertimbangan" hakim" terkait"
pembuktian"unsurCunsur"tindak"pidana"yang"didakwakan."
C! Dapatkah" terdakwa" didakwa" atas" dasar" delik" materil?" " Gunakan" teori" jenis"
pidana" lingkungan" dan" kaitannya" dengan" pasalCpasal" pidana" di" dalam" UU" No."
32/2009."
C! Perlukah"unsur"mens'rea"dibuktikan?"""
c.! Referensi"yang"digunakan"setidaknya"berikut"ini:"
C! Michael" Faure," “Towards" a" New" Model" of" Criminalization" of" Environmental"
Pollution:" the" Case" of" Indonesia”," dalam:" M." Faure" dan" N." Niessen" (eds.),"
Environmental' Law' in' Development:' Lessons' from' the' Indonesian' Experience"
(Cheltenham:"Edward"Elgar,"2006),"'188C207."!"HARD"COPY"di"HAN"
C! Guy" Stessens," “Corporate" Criminal" Liability:" A" Comparative" Perspective”," The'
International'and'Comparative'Law'Quarterly,"Vol."43(3),"1994,"hal."493C520"
TTD.""
Tim"Pengajar"

3"

"