UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NAHDLATUL ULAMA JEPARA

FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN ILMU KEGURUAN

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Jl. Taman Siswa (Pekeng) Tahunan Jepara Jawa Tengah 59427

FORMULIR
RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER (RPS)
No. Dokumen: No. Revisi: Hal Tanggal Terbit:
RPS-Pr-01 01 1 dari 9 24 Pebruari 2020
Mata Kuliah: Semester: Jumlah sks: Kode MK:
Pragmatics 6 (Enam) 2 SKS PBIP17108
Dosen Pengampu/Penanggung jawab:
Nina Sofiana, M.Pd.
Taufiqurrohman, S.S, M.Hum.
CP Sikap:
1. Cendekia dan berakhakul berdasarkan nilai-nilai ahlussunnah wal jamaah;
2. Berkontribusi dalam peningkatan mutu kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa,
bernegara, dan kemajuan peradaban berdasarkan Pancasila;
3. Bekerja sama dan memiliki kepekaan sosial serta kepedulian terhadap
masyarakat dan lingkungan;
4. Menginternalisasi nilai, norma, dan etika akademik;
5. Menunjukkan sikap bertanggung jawab atas pekerjaan di bidang keahliannya
secara mandiri;
CP Pengetahuan:
6. Mampu menguasai dan penerapkan pengetahuan dan teknologi terkait dengan
proses pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris serta mengaplikasikan ICT dalam
Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan
peningkatan mutu pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris;
(CPL)
7. Mampu menguasai konsep dan prinsip bidang inti pengajaran bahasa Inggris:
structure, grammar, reading, speaking, listening, writing, dengan didukung
oleh beberapa pengetahuan micro-linguistics;
CP Keterampilan Umum:
8. Menerapkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan inovatif dalam konteks
pengembangan atau implementasi ilmu pengetahuan dan/atau teknologi
sesuai dengan bidang keahliannya;
9. Mampu menunjukkan kinerja mandiri, bermutu, dan terukur;
CP Keterampilan Khusus:
10. Mampu menerapkan prinsip dan teori pendidikan melalui perencanaan dan
pelaksanaan pembelajaran di sekolah secara bertanggung jawab;
11. Mampu menerjemah jenis teks Inggris-Indonesia dan Indonesia-Inggris;
1. The students are able to comprehend the concept of meaning and context and
be able to identify and analyze its phenomena in both oral and written
language;
2. The students are able to comprehend the concept of the properties of
discourse such as: concept of reference, inference, presupposition, and
entailment and be able to identify and analyze its phenomena in both oral and
written language;
3. The students are able to comprehend the concept of deixis and be able to
Capaian Pembelajaran
identify and analyze its phenomena in both oral and written language;
Matakuliah (CPMK)
4. The students are able to comprehend the concept of cooperation and be able
to identify and analyze its phenomena in communication;
5. The students are able to comprehend the concept of speech act and be able to
identify and analyze its phenomena in communication;
6. The students are able to comprehend the concept of politeness and be able to
identify and analyze its phenomena in communication;
7. The students are able to comprehend the relation between discourse and
culture and be able to identify and analyze its phenomena in daily life.
Deskripsi Mata Kuliah This course deals with the study of language from the users’ point of view,
 especially of the choices they make, the constraints they encounter in using
language in social interaction and the effect their use of the language has on the
other participants in an act of communication. The field of this study is between
semantics, sociolinguistics, and extra-linguistics context. Topics to discuss include
Meaning and Context, Reference and Inference, Presupposition and Entailment,
Deixis, Cooperation and Implicature, Speech Acts and Events, Politeness and
Interaction, and Discourse and Culture. The assessment on students’ learning
progress is based on students’ weekly contribution to the class discussion,
individual and group assignments, the mid semester and the final tests.
Bentuk, Penilaian
Kemampuan yang Bahan Kajian/ Metode
Minggu Waktu
diharapkan Materi Pembelajaran, & Bobot
Ke- (menit) Teknik Indikator
(Sub-CPMK) Pembelajaran Pengalaman (%)
Belajar
1  The students are  Introduction and  Lecturing& Tatap Non-test:  Precision 10
able to understand course outline Discussion Muka  Composing on
rules and policy of  Meaning and  Task1: (TM) a paper explaining
the course Context: Types Writing a 2x50 and
including the of Meaning; report:  Doing a identifyingt
attendance, Context, co-text, identify Presentatio he Types of
assignment text articles from n meaning in
accomplishment, its meaning, both oral
syllabus, and context, and and written
assessment and co-text language;
evaluation.  Precision
 The students are on
able to identify explaining
theoretically and and
practically the identifying
concept of context in
Meaning and both oral
Context: Types of and written
Meaning; Context, language
co-text, text  Precision
on
explaining
and
identifying
co-text in
both oral
and written
language
2-3 The students are Reference and  Lecturing& Tugas Non-test:  Precision 10
able to identify Inference: Discussion Mandiri  Composing and
theoretically and Referential and  Task2: dan a paper congruity
practically the attributive uses,  Writing a Terstruktur on
concept of Names and report: (T)  Doing a explaining
Reference and Referents, The role identify and 2x50 Presentatio and
Inference: of co-text, and analyze a text TM 2 x 50 n identifying
Referential and Anaphoric taken from referential
attributive uses, reference The Jakarta and
Names and Post attributive
Referents, The role newspaper uses in both
of co-text, and from its oral and
Anaphoric reference reference and written
inference. language
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the concept
of names
and
referents in
 both oral
and written
language

Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the role of
co-text in
text
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the concept
of
anaphoric
reference in
text
4-5 The students are Presupposition and  Lecturing& Tugas Non-test:  Precisionan 10
able to identify Entailment: Discussion Mandiri  Composing a d congruity
theoretically and Presupposition,  Task 3: dan paper on
use practically the Types of Writing a Terstruktur explaining
concept of presupposition, The report: (T)  Doing a and
Presupposition and projection identify and 2x50 Presentation identifying
Entailment: problems, Ordered analyze a text TM 2 x 50 the concept
Presupposition, entailments taken from of
Types of The Jakarta Presupposit
presupposition, The Post ion and its
projection newspaper types in
problems, Ordered from its communica
entailments presuppositio tion;
n and  Precisionan
entailment. d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the
projection
problems in
communica
tion
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the Ordered
entailments
in
communica
tion
6-7 The students are Deixis: Person,  Lecturing& Tugas Non-test:  Precisionan 10
able to identify Spatial, Temporal, Discussion Mandiri  Composing a d congruity
theoretically and Social, and  Task 4: dan paper on
use practically the Discourse Writing a Terstruktur explaining
concept of Deixis: report: (T)  Doing a and
Person, Spatial, identify and 2x50 Presentation identifying
Temporal, Social, analyze a TM 2 x 50 the concept
and Discourse of Deixis;
 short story  Precisionan
from its d congruity
deixis on
explaining
and
identifying
the kinds of
deixis in
both oral
and written
language
8 MID SEMESTER TEST 90 minute Written test 30
9-10 The students are Cooperation and Lecturing& (T) 2x50 Non-test:  Precisionan 15
able to identify Implicature: The Discussion TM 2 x 50  Composing a d congruity
theoretically and cooperative Task 5: paper on
use practically the principles, Flouting Writing a explaining
concept of maxims, Hedges, report:  Doing a and
Cooperation and and Implicature identify and Presentation identifying
Implicature: The analyze a the concept
cooperative conversation of
principles, Flouting between cooperative
maxims, Hedges, lecturer and principles
and Implicature students from in
the conversatio
infringement n
of  Precisionan
cooperative d congruity
principles and on
its possible explaining
implicature and
that arises. identifying
Flouting
maximsin a
conversatio
n
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the use of
hedges in a
conversatio
n
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
the
arousing
implicature
in a
conversatio
n
11-12 The students are Speech Acts and  Lecturing& (T) 2x50 Non-test:  Precisionan 10
able to identify Events: Types of Discussion TM 2 x 50  Composing a d congruity
theoretically and utterence, Speech  Task 6: paper on
use practically the acts forces, and Writing a explaining
concept of speech Kinds of speech act report:  Doing a and
act, including: identify and Presentation identifying
Types of utterence, analyze a Types of
Spech acts forces, conversation utterence in
and Kinds of speech between communica
act tion
 lecturer and  Precisionan
students from d congruity
its speech act. on differing
Speech acts
forces in
communica
tion
 Precisionan
d congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
, the Kinds
of speech
act in
communica
tion
13-14 The students are Politeness and  Lecturing& (T) 2x50 Non-test:  Precisionan 15
able to identify Interaction: Discussion TM 2 x 50  Composing a d congruity
theoretically and Concept of face and paper on
use practically face Politeness strategies  Task7: explaining
threatening act and Writing a  Doing a and
face saving act, and report: Presentation identifying
politeness strategies identify and the concept
analyze a of face in
presidential society.
debate from  Precision
the use of and
politeness congruity
on
explaining
and
identifying
Politeness
strategies
use in
society
15 The students are Discourse and  Lecturing& TM 2x50 Non-test:  Precision 10
able to identify Culture: DA, Discussion  Composing a and
theoretically and Cohesion, and paper congruity
use practically the Coherence  Task8: on
relation between Writing a  Doing a explaining
discourse and report: Presentation and
culture: DA, identify and identifying
Cohesion, and analyze a text relation
Coherence from the use between
of discourse discourse
markers and culture
 Precision
and
congruity
on
explaining
and
applying
discourse
analysis in
communica
tion
 Precision
and
congruity
on
explaining,
identifying,
 and
justifying
cohesion
and
coherence
in a text
16 FINAL TEST 90 minute Written test 30
Keterangan : TM = kegiatan Tatap Muka ,
T = Tugas Terstruktur dan Tugas Mandiri

Daftar Referensi:
1. Leech, G. 1985. Semantics the Study of Meaning. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
2. Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press
3. Renkema, J. 1993. Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
4. Grundy, P. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Brown, G. and G. Yule.1996. Discourse Analysis. London: CambridgeUniversity Press.
6. Levinson, S.C. 1985. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jepara, 24 Pebruari 2020

Mengetahui,
Ketua PS PBI Dosen Pengampu

Husni Mubarok, M.Pd. Taufiqurrohman, S.S, M.Hum.

Lampiran 2. Penilaian
1. Aspek Penilaian
a. Sikap : cara menyampaikan pendapat dalam diskusi, tanggungjawab dan
kedisiplinan dalam menyelesaikan tugas
b. Pengetahuan : penguasaan materi yang ditunjukkan dalam diskusi, presentasi, ujian tengah
semester dan ujian semester
c. Keterampilan : mampu mereview artikel jurnal dan menyajikan media presentasi yang
kreatif

2. Rubrik Penilaian
Penilaian Deskripsi Kualitas Telaah
Excellent (A) 81 and up Excellent at analysis and practice of language in context and acts
of communication
Very Good (AB) 76 – 80 Very good at analysis and practice of language in context and acts
of communication
Good at analysis and practice of language in context and acts of
Good (B) 71 -75 communication
Satisfactory at analysis and practice of language in context and
Satisfactory (C - BC) acts of communication
61-70
Unsatisfactory at analysis and practice of language in context and
Unsatisfactory (CD - E) acts of communication
60 and below 60

3. Pembobotan Komponen Penilaian

No Kriteria Penilaian Retang Bobot (%)
1 Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS) 0-100 30
2 Ujian Akhir Semester (UAS) 0-100 30
3 Tugas dan keaktifan 0-100 30
4 Presensi 0-14 10

4. Kategori Penentuan Huruf Mutu

Nilai Dalam Point Rentang Nilai
Huruf
A 4,0 81-100
AB 3,5 76-80
B 3,0 71-75
BC 2,5 66-70
C 2,0 61-65
CD 1,5 56-60
D 1 51-55
E 0 <50