ISU DIET MUTAKHIR

Overview

Herni Dwi Herawati

Program Studi S1 Ilmu Gizi
Fakultas Ilmu-ilmu Kesehatan
Universitas Alma Ata
 IDENTITAS MATA KULIAH

Nama Mata kuliah : Isu Diet Mutakhir

Kode Mata kuliah : AAGZ316
Bobot SKS : 2 SKS (2 T)
Semester : 2
Prasyarat : Metodologi Penelitian
Koordinator (LNO) : Herni Dwi Herawati, MPH
Dosen Pengampu
 DESKRIPSI MATA KULIAH

Pada mata kuliah ini mahasiswa akan mengkaji isu -isu masalah
gizi dan diet terkini, serta memberikan respon kritisnya
berdasarkan telaah pustaka
PETA KONSEP CAPAIAN PEMBELAJARAN
 KOMPONEN PENILAIAN

NO. KOMPONEN DEFINISI BOBOT

1 Kehadiran Prosentase kehadiran mahasiswa pada perkuliahan. 10%

2 Keaktifan Rata-rata nilai keaktifan mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan 20%

interaktif, tutorial maupun diskusi.

3 Tugas Harian Rata-rata nilai tugas harian/mingguan yang dikerjakan oleh 35%
/ Mingguan mahasiswa baik secara individu maupun kelompok

4 Ujian Akhir Nilai ujian akhir teori 35%

  NILAI AKHIR
(𝑵𝑻×𝒔𝒌𝒔𝑻)
 𝑵𝑨 = σ 𝒔𝒌𝒔
 NA = Nilai Akhir
 NT = Nilai Teori
 REFERENCE

 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM). Critical Appraisal Tools.

http://www.cebm.net/critical -appraisal/
 Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP). Critical Appraisal .
http://www.casp-uk.net/
 Strengthening the Repor ting of Obser vational Studies in Epidemiology
(STROBE). STROBE Checklist . http://www.strobe-statement.org/
 Ef fendi AT, Hardinsyah, Ef fendi YH, Dewi M, Nurdin NM. 2013.
Nutrigenomik: Resistensi Insulin, Sindrom Metabolik dan Prediabetes.
Bogor: IPB Press
 Erdman JW, Macdonald IA , Zeisel SH. 201 2. Present Knowledge in
Nutrition 10th Edition. Iowa: Wiley -Blackwell
 European Commission. 2010. Functional Foods. Luxembourg:
Publication Of fice of European Union
 Shi J, Mazza G, Maguer ML. 2002. Functional Foods: Biochemical and
Processing Aspects Volume 2. USA: CRC Press
 Student Learning Centre. 2009. Critical Thinking. Adelaide: Flinders
University
 APA ITU CRITICAL TIHINKING ?

Menurut Beyer (1985), critical thingking adalah kemampuan

untuk :
 Menilai valid tidaknya suatu sumber informasi
 Bisa membedakan mana yang relevan dan mana yang tidak
relevan
 Bisa membedakan mana yang fakta dan mana yang opini
 Mampu untuk mengidentifikasi bias dan sudut pandang
 TABEL CRITICAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST
FOR POPULAR ARTICLE
No Critical Questions Yes No Explanation

Does the article make

1
sense? Is it clear?

2 What is the author claiming?

3 What is the author argument?

4 Is the argument logical?

Is there any evidence?

5

Does the evidence support

6 the claim?

Do you know other work

7 which support these Give at least 2 scientific articles that support these findings
findings?
Do you know other work
8 which contradict these Give at least 2 scientific articles that support these findings
findings?

Do you agree with the

9
author? Why?

Strongly disagree Partially disagree Neutral Partially agree Strongly agree

10 What is your position?
 CRITICAL APPRAISAL
ON JOURNAL ARTICLE

Critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify

the strengths and weaknesses of a research article in
order to assess the usefulness and validity of research
findings

(Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol

Hepatol.2009;6(2 ):8291.)
Critical appraisal is a systematic process
used to identify the strengths and weakness
of a research article
Critical appraisal provides a basis for
decisions on whether to use the results of a
study in clinical practice
Critical appraisal checklists are useful tools
to help assess study quality
 KOMPONEN JURNAL
Memahami Menilai

Gambaran Abstrak
umum

Pendahuluan Besar masalah, pertanyaan penelitian, hipotesis

Populasi, subyek, besar sampel, cara pengambilan

Metodologi
sampel, pengukuran, rencana analisis

Flow penelitian, karakteristik subyek, hasil utama

Hasil
penelitian

Diskusi
CRITICALLY APPRAISE WHAT YOU READ

Simple checklists enable the useful information

to be identified.