BAHASA INGGRIS
DISUSUN OLEH
Puji syukur kami panjatkan kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa berkat limpahan dan rahmat-Nya
sehigga penulis mampu menyelesaikan tugas mata kuliah Bahasa inggris ini dengan baik dan
tepat waktu. Adapun judul makalah yang penulis buat yaitu “MAKALAH REVIEW JURNAL
PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA PADA KEUNGGULAN KOMPETITIF STUDI INDONESIA DAN PEKERJA
PARIWISATA CHINA”. Penulis mengucapkan terima kasih kepada pihak-pihak yang telah
membantu dalam penyusunan karya tulis ini : 1. Kepada Bu Evi selaku dosen pembimbing mata
kuliah Bahasa inggris.
2. Kepada orang tua yang telah memberikan dukungan dalam pengerjaan karya tulis ini.
3. Kepada rekan-rekan yang telah membantu dalam pengerjaan karya tulis ini
Penulis menyadari bahwa dalam penyusunan makalah ini tidaklah sempurna, baik dari segi
penyusunan, bahasan, ataupun penulisannya. Oleh karena itu, penulis mengharapkan kritik dan
saran yang sifatnya membangun. Semoga makalah ini dapat memberikan wawasan yang lebih
luas dan menjadi sumbangan pemikiran kepada pembaca.
FOREWORD
We thank God Almighty for His abundance and grace so that the author is able to complete this
English course assignment properly and on time. The title of the paper that the author made is
"REVIEW OF JOURNAL PAPERS THE EFFECT OF WORK MOTIVATION ON COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE OF INDONESIAN STUDIES AND CHINA TOURISM WORKERS". The author would like
to thank those who have helped in the preparation of this paper:
RUMUSAN MASALAH
Latar belakang
Pesantren yang didirikan melalui sebuah lembaga telah berubah sifatnya menjadi organisasi
yang tidak lagi bersifat personal. Memiliki lembaga yang mapan dapat memberikan suasana
kerjasama yang baik sesuai dengan tanggung jawab masing-masing anggota. Dengan demikian,
lembaga pendidikan di lingkungan pesantren berhak mengatur jalannya sendiri.
Lembaga pesantren menjadi lembaga yang menaungi dan mengatasi setiap permasalahan
dalam pendidikan pesantren. Oleh karena itu, pemimpin dapat mengambil keputusan yang
sesuai dengan kebutuhan semua pihak, dan telah disosialisasikan kepada pihak-pihak yang
terlibat serta mengimplementasikan keputusan yang telah diambil. Ada beberapa perbedaan
dalam setiap pengambilan keputusan atau kebijakan bagi seorang pemimpin. Ini juga memiliki
berbagai karakteristik. Beberapa memiliki sifat otoriter dalam mengambil keputusan, dan ada
pula yang demokratis. Itu tergantung pada cara seorang pemimpin mengatasi
kepemimpinannya. Tipe kepemimpinan dapat diartikan sebagai suatu pola atau tipe
kepemimpinan yang dapat dilaksanakan oleh lebih dari satu perilaku dan gaya kepemimpinan
yang mendukungnya. Sedangkan gaya kepemimpinan dapat diartikan sebagai perilaku atau cara
yang dipilih dan digunakan oleh pemimpin dalam mempengaruhi pikiran, perasaan, sikap, dan
perilaku anggota organisasi dan bawahannya.
Ada beberapa perbedaan dalam setiap pengambilan keputusan atau kebijakan bagi seorang
pemimpin. Ini juga memiliki berbagai karakteristik. Beberapa memiliki sifat otoriter dalam
mengambil keputusan, dan ada pula yang demokratis. Itu tergantung pada cara seorang
pemimpin mengatasi kepemimpinannya. Tipe kepemimpinan dapat diartikan sebagai suatu
pola atau tipe kepemimpinan yang dapat dilaksanakan oleh lebih dari satu perilaku dan gaya
kepemimpinan yang mendukungnya. Sedangkan gaya kepemimpinan dapat diartikan sebagai
perilaku atau cara yang dipilih dan digunakan oleh pemimpin dalam mempengaruhi pikiran,
perasaan, sikap, dan perilaku anggota organisasi dan bawahannya. Menurut Eugene Emerson
Jennings dan Robert T Golembiewski, pemimpin dalam organisasi apa pun dapat diklasifikasikan
menjadi lima tipe utama; pemimpin otokratis, pemimpin militeristik, pemimpin paternalistik,
pemimpin karismatik, dan pemimpin demokratis.
Melihat realitas pesantren, ada beberapa hal yang luar biasa, terutama terkait dengan
pengambilan keputusan dan kebijakan yang bertujuan untuk pembangunan yang lebih progresif
dari sebelumnya. Karena bagi pesantren, seorang pemimpin dianggap sebagai kekuatan utama
dalam mengambil keputusan untuk semua aspek pesantren itu sendiri. Seolah-olah
pengambilan keputusan tidak dapat diubah atau didiskusikan ketika seorang pemimpin di
pondok pesantren menetapkan suatu kebijakan.
Hal ini berlaku bagi pimpinan pondok pesantren itu sendiri atau pimpinan lembaga yang
mengelola lembaga pendidikan. Tidak akan ada perbedaan antara keduanya karena ketika
seorang pemimpin puncak tidak lagi mengurus hal-hal seperti itu, seorang pemimpin menengah
harus menanganinya. Oleh karena itu, kedua tipologi kepemimpinan ini akan memiliki
karakteristik yang sama. Sehingga mereka akan mengandalkan supremasi dalam menentukan
dan mengambil keputusan. Setidaknya dalam proses pengambilan keputusan, tujuan yang baik
atau tujuan untuk semua pihak harus dipertimbangkan dalam forum diskusi di mana semua
pihak berpartisipasi dalam memutuskan kebijakan terbaik.
The development of Islamic boarding schools is mainly due to the diversification of the
education carried out, which also includes madrasas and public schools that adhere to a more
rational, democratic, and open system. Thus, some pesantren develop institutions as
institutions that represent collective leadership. Pesantren is also one of the fastest growing
educational institutions in Indonesia. In this era of modernization, pesantren are more
adaptable to the times by establishing formal educational institutions so that pesantren are no
longer left behind in the academic realm.
Pesantren that was established through an institution has changed its nature into an
organization that is no longer personal. Having an established institution can provide a good
atmosphere of cooperation in accordance with the responsibilities of each member. Thus,
educational institutions in the pesantren environment have the right to set their own path.
Pesantren institutions become institutions that overshadow and overcome every problem in
Islamic boarding school education. Therefore, the leader can make decisions that suit the needs
of all parties, and have been socialized to the parties involved and implement the decisions that
have been taken. There are some differences in every decision or policy for a leader. It also has
various characteristics. Some have an authoritarian nature in making decisions, and some are
democratic. It depends on how a leader copes with his leadership. The type of leadership can
be interpreted as a pattern or type of leadership that can be implemented by more than one
behavior and leadership style that supports it. While the leadership style can be defined as the
behavior or method chosen and used by leaders in influencing the thoughts, feelings, attitudes,
and behavior of members of the organization and their subordinates.
There are some differences in every decision or policy for a leader. It also has various
characteristics. Some have an authoritarian nature in making decisions, and some are
democratic. It depends on how a leader copes with his leadership. The type of leadership can
be interpreted as a pattern or type of leadership that can be implemented by more than one
behavior and leadership style that supports it. While leadership style can be interpreted as
behavior or ways that are chosen and used by leaders in influencing thoughts,
feelings, attitudes, and behavior of members of the organization and their subordinates.
According to Eugene Emerson Jennings and Robert T Golembiewski, leaders in any organization
can be classified into five main types; autocratic leaders, militaristic leaders, paternalistic
leaders, charismatic leaders, and democratic leaders
Looking at the reality of pesantren, there are some extraordinary things, especially related to
decision-making and policies aimed at more progressive development than before. Because for
pesantren, a leader is considered as the main force in making decisions for all aspects of the
pesantren itself. It is as if decision-making cannot be changed or discussed when a leader in a
boarding school sets a policy.
This applies to the leadership of the Islamic boarding school itself or the head of the institution
that manages the educational institution. There would be no difference between the two
because when a top leader no longer took care of such things, a middle leader had to handle
them. Therefore, these two leadership typologies will have the same characteristics. So they
will rely on supremacy in determining and making decisions. At least in the decision-making
process, a good cause or goal for all parties should be considered in a discussion forum where
all parties participate in deciding the best policy.
Based on the reasons above, the purpose of reviewing the journal of Leadership Decision
Making Policy in Islamic Boarding Schools is to Improve the Managerial Quality of Formal
Education
TUJUAN(research purposes)
METODE(Methods)
The approach used in this study is qualitative. The type of research used in this study is
a case study, which is qualitative research that seeks to find meaning, investigate
processes, and gain a deep understanding and understanding of individuals, groups, or
situations.
first, the decision-making design consisted of steps like forming a team, identifying needs
analysis, program designing, employing program socialization, and undergoing process
evaluation, while the focus of the decision-making design was to improve the quality of
management. Second, the implementation of decision-making procedures from the leaders
can be seen in improving the quality of human resources, where they fixed and
highlighted this particular aspect as they are directly.
related to the quality of school management. Third, the leaders' evaluation process
was done directly and indirectly through some discussion. The evaluation standard used
is the evaluation undergoesthe process within the decision is implemented and at the
impact of the decision to measure how significant it is.
The rationale of the research context in this study is mainly related to the fact that there is
such a significant impact of the decision-making procedure taken by leaders in Islamic
Boarding School, mostly known as pesantren, to improve the quality of managerial
activities in formal educational institutions. Islamic boarding school institutes that oversee
formal educational institutions have different strategies and decision-making with
targeted goals and distinctive considerations in regulating the decisions to be reached.
Based on the discussion above, it can be concluded that,first, the decision-making design
consists of steps in the form of team formation, needs analysis, program design,
program socialization, and process evaluation, while the form of decision-making design
in the form of appointment of a compatible principal, joint learning program, the
disseminationof teachers to continue their studies. Second, the implementation of decision-
making by the institute'sleaderscan be seen in improving the quality of human resources,
where theyfixand resolvesthehuman resources. They also believe that the quality of human
resources is directly related to the quality of school management itself.Third, evaluation
from the institute's leaders is done in a direct and indirect mannerand is always
discussed. The evaluation standard used is the evaluation when it is carried out during the
process and at the end of the decision-making and measures how far the decision-making
hasimproved, not in its realization and the level of a gap between decision-making and
decision-making actorperpetrator.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
https://doi.org/10.35719/jieman.v4i1.107
Al Qodri, Syarif Ali. (2022). Decision-Making Policies of Leaders within Islamic Boarding School’s
Institute to Improve Formal Education Managerial’s Quality. Journal of Islamic
Educational Management, 4(1), 41-59