Jurnal Internasional Penelitian Lanjutan dalam Ilmu Komputer dan Teknik Perangkat Lunak IS
Ⅰ. Perkenalan
Pentingnya kesejahteraan psikologis di tempat kerja telah berkembang dalam 20- 30 tahun terakhir karena
pekerjaan fisik lebih telah diubah menjadi pekerjaan mental, dan lebih banyak orang bekerja secara mental dia merasa
lebih banyak tekanan psikologis di tempat kerja. Beberapa persentase tekanan di tempat kerja diperlukan untuk kreativitas
dan kinerja dalam pekerjaan tetapi setelah tingkat tertentu itu mempengaruhi secara negatif kinerja karyawan serta
organisasi. Tekanan menjadi kompetitif meningkatkan produktivitas dan kreativitas karyawan, tetapi ketika seorang
karyawan menemukan dirinya ke dalam banyak tekanan kesejahteraan karyawan mendapatkan hancur.
Kesejahteraan psikologis adalah elemen inti dari kesejahteraan secara keseluruhan dan terhubung dengan
kesehatan fisik, kesehatan mental, kehidupan yang lebih lama bagi karyawan individu. Orang-orang bahagia ketika
mereka secara subjektif percaya diri mereka bahagia. Kesejahteraan psikologis mengalami getaran positif daripada
getaran negatif. Menurut model circumplex emosi, kesejahteraan psikologis mengukur dua dimensi perasaan individu,
hedonis atau kesenangan. Psikolog telah mengalami peran dimensi kesenangan dalam kehidupan individu. Fsor contoh
orang depresi cenderung memiliki getaran negatif, pesimis, harga diri yang rendah, tingkat motivasi yang rendah,
kapasitas kerja yang berkurang, hipertensi atau alkoholisme daripada orang-orang yang memiliki getaran positif, optimis,
harga diri yang tinggi dan semangat tinggi, produktivitas tinggi, kehidupan yang lebih bahagia.
Investasi dalam kesejahteraan psikologis membayar dividen kepada majikan dan karyawan. Majikan
mendapatkan manfaat dalam bentuk hasil yang lebih baik dan peningkatan produktivitas, loyalitas, tenaga kerja yang
berdedikasi dan untuk karyawan yang lebih lama hidup lebih bahagia, tingkat kepuasan yang lebih besar. Banyak
penelitian dan penelitian telah menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan antara tingkat kesejahteraan psikologis di tempat kerja
dan hasil bisnis untuk organisasi. Saat ini adalah masalah dasar untuk mengembangkan kesejahteraan psikologis yang
positif bagi seluruh tenaga kerja dan majikan. Kesejahteraan psikologis yang positif mengacu pada membawa kemanjuran,
harapan, optimisme dan ketahanan di antara karyawan pekerja. Kesejahteraan psikologis telah ditemukan terkait dengan
hasil kerCjarodpaannkzeahniodu&paWn rpigrihbta(d1i9. 99) melakukan penelitian yang cukup besar tentang hubungan
antara kesejahteraan psikologis dan kinerja di tempat kerja. Bahkan orang-orang yang positif dan bahagia memiliki hasil
fisik dan mental yang lebih baik dan perilaku dan mereka lebih tangguh dalam menghadapi kesulitan, memiliki sistem
kekebalan tubuh yang lebih kuaPt ednaenlimtiaennjianliabnei
rkteuhjuidaunpuanntuykanmgelnegbeihksbpalhoaragsiia.kesejahteraan psikologis karyawan sektor IT di India. Industri IT
© www.ijarcsse.com, Semua Hak Dilindungi Undang-Undang Halaman | 1
Multilizer PDF Translator Free version - translation is limited to ~ 3 pages per translation.
Multilizer PDF Translator Free version - translation is limited to ~ 3 pages per translation.
India adalah salah satu eksportir layanan yang lebih besar dari India. Setiap tahun ribuan insinyur muda dari seluruh
Hipotesis
(Di:aTlihidkaaknaddaarkioHre1la)si yang signifikan antara 14 aspek psikologis dan kesejahteraan karyawan
IT. (Di:aKlihekseajnahdtearraiaHn 2p)sikologis karyawan tidak berbeda sehubungan dengan jenis kelamin
karyawan. (Di:aKlihekseajnahdtearraiaHn 3p)sikologis karyawan tidak berbeda sehubungan dengan usia
karyawan.
IV. METODOLOGI PENELITIAN
Dalam penelitian ini, desain Penelitian Deskriptif diadopsi. Sumber data adalah primer dan sekunder. Penelitian
ini memakan waktu enam bulan di mana data dikumpulkan dari lapangan, terorganisir, dianalisis dan
Aryan et al., International Journals of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering ISSN:
2277-128X (Volume-7, Edisi-6) disajikan dalam bentuk analitik. Studi ini menggunakan kuesioner terstruktur diri
untuk
mengumpulkan Data. Teknik analisis statistik deskriptif digunakan untuk mendapatkan ringkasan tanggapan yang
berguna. Pengambilan sampel acak sederhana digunakan dan total populasi sampel ratusan karyawan. Pengambilan
sampel acak sederhana digunakan karena tidak ada kompleksitas yang terlibat. Versi 21 SPSS telah digunakan untuk
menganalisis data.
Alat berikut digunakan untuk menganalisis
data. Analisis Persentase
• Regresi linear
T-Uji
Korelasi biserial titik
Tabel 2: KUALIFIKASI
Frekuensi Persen Persen Valid Kumulatif
Persen
(Dialihk 30 30.0 30.0 30.0
Berlaku U.G .G 70 70.0 70.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0
Tabel di atas mengungkapkan faktor demografis dalam penelitian. Mayoritas responden adalah laki-laki yaitu, 80%,
responden maksimum termasuk dalam kelompok usia kurang dari 25 tahun yaitu, 61%. Dari total responden 30% adalah
pasca sarjana dan sisanya berada di bawah lulusan.
2) ANALISIS REGRESI LINEAR
(Di:aTlihidkaaknaddaarkioHre1la)si yang signifikan antara empat belas aspek psikologis dan kesejahteraan karyawan IT.
Table No 3 provides the R and R square values. The R value represents the simple correlation and is 0.751 (the “R”
column) which indicates high degree of correlation between fourteen facets and well being of IT employees. The R
square value (the “R square” column) indicates that how much variation in well being (dependent variable) can be
explained by fourteen psychological facets (independent variables). In this case 56.4% variation can be explained out of
total variation.
Table 4: ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 65.284 14 4.663 7.840 .000b
1 Residual 50.556 85 .595
Total 115.840 99
Table No 4 is ANOVA table, which indicates how well the regression equation fits the data. With 14
predictors the Regression effect has 14 degrees of freedom. The regression effect is statistically significant where
F(14,85) = 7.840 , p < 0.05 indicating that prediction of the dependent variable is accomplished better that can be
done by chance. The p value (labeled as sig.) of the F statistic is less than 0.05, demonstrating very strong evidence
that the model has a strong explanatory power of prediction. It could also be said that since the F value is significant
then all the 14 variables jointly affect the dependent variable in the population.
2. T TEST
H2: Employees psychological wellbeing does not differ with respect to the gender of employees
Table: 5 Group Statistics
GENDE N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
R
Wellbeing FEMAL 20 39.2000 2.50473 .56008
composite E
score MALE 80 35.7875 4.03684 .45133
Table 5 shows independent sample t-test that was conducted to compare the wellbeing scores for males and females
(Table 5). The results showed there were significant differences in scores for males (M=39.2, SD=2.50) and females
(M=35.78, SD=4.03).
The independent samples T-test was chosen as the statistical measure for this question. Results of the Levene’s
test indicated that equal variances could be assumed and an alpha level of .05 was chosen for this test. The
p-value of Levene's test is 0.141; we can assume that the variance of two groups is the same. (If the p-value of Levene's
test is less than 0.05, we have to use the "Unequal variance" result), since the p-value is 0.000, we reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is difference between the mean score of Wellbeing of Male and females at 5% significance level.
3. H3: Employees psychological wellbeing does not differ with respect to the age of employees.
© www.ijarcsse.com, All Rights Page | 226
Reserved
Table 6 Group Statistics
AGE N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
less than 25 61 36.3770 3.99651 .51170
TOTAL
more than 25 39 36.6154 4.08215 .65367
Table 6 shows independent sample t-test that was conducted to compare the wellbeing scores for males and
females (Table 5). The results showed there were not significant differences in scores for males (M=36.37, SD=3.99) and
females (M=36.61, SD=4.08).
Table 7 Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test t-test for Equality of Means
for Equality of
Variances
F Sig. t df Sig. (2- Mean Std. 95% Confidence
tailed) Differenc Error Interval of the
e Differenc Difference
e Lower Upper
Equal variances .029 .865 -.288 98 .774 -.23834 .82623 -1.87796 1.40129
TOTA assumed
L Equal variances -.287 79.852 .775 -.23834 .83013 -1.89040 1.41373
not assumed
Results of the Levene’s test indicated that equal variances could be assumed and an alpha level of .05 was chosen for this
test. The p-value of Levene's test is 0.865; we can assume that the variance of two groups is the same. (If the p-value of
Levene's test is less than 0.05, we have to use the "Unequal variance" result), since the p-value is 0.774, we accept the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is no difference between the mean score of Wellbeing different age groups at 5%
significance level. In this case, we therefore do not accept the alternative hypothesis and accept that there are no
statistically significant differences between means of two groups.
In the Correlations table, match the row to the column between the two continuous variables. The Pearson Correlation
is the actual correlation value that denotes magnitude and direction, the Sig. (2-tailed) is the p-value that is interpreted,
and the N is the number of observations that were correlated. In the above table the p-value is LESS THAN .05, giving
evidence of a statistically significant bivariate association between the two variables.
We had coded 1 for female and 2 for male. The value of correlation comes to -0.342 that means as we go up from female to
male wellbeing diminishes.
Table 9 Correlations
TOTAL AGE
Pearson Correlation 1 .029
TOTAL Sig. (2-tailed) .774
N 100 100
Pearson Correlation .029 1
AGE Sig. (2-tailed) .774
N 100 100
The p-value is MORE THAN .05 , so we can conclude that there is not a statistically significant association between
the two continuous variables. These results validate the results we found in T test.
V. CONCLUSION
IT industry in India has got a remarkable increase due to economic reforms in Indian economy and encouraging
government policies. IT and ITes professionals are at a continuous stress to deliver services competently and efficiently.
Employees working in IT companies are prone to develop a lot of health issues due to continuous physical and mental
stress. As technology advances, it brings extra strain on people to familiarize with new technique. Employees suffering
from depression feel fatigue, physical discomfort, emotional stress, performance decline which can lead to
increased absenteeism. It has already been proved by various studies that there is considerable relationship between
Psychological well being and performance at work. This present study concludes that there is difference between
the Wellbeing of Male and females at IT companies, but age doesn’t affect wellbeing of employees. Wellbeing
of employees depends upon warmth in the relations, how management deals with the employees, motivation level,
confidence in self and self ambition. For a happier professional life wellbeing at workplace is of paramount importance.
At present times it is an basic issue to develop positive psychological well being for the whole workforce whether it be
employees or employers. To enhance wellbeeinggageempinloyr ecerseasthi onu,ldmeditation, yoga or just have a
good holiday. It
will bring efficacy , hope, optimism and resilience among workers. Healthy workforce signifies improved performance by
employee that in turn helps the management to achieve its higher goals which will help to create a strong community
also. Enhancing well-being in the workplace accelerate performance and profitability by having employees who
are psychologically healthy and happy at workplace.
REFERENCES
[1] Luo Lu, Robin Gilmour, Shu Fang Kao, Mao‐Ting Huang, (2006) "A cross‐cultural study of work/family d‐
emands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: the Taiwanese vs British", Career Development
International, Vol. 11 Iss: 1, pp.9 – 27
[2] Nicole Renee Baptiste, (2008) "Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and
performance: A new dimension for HRM", Management Decision, Vol. 46 Iss: 2, pp.284 – 309
[3] Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital
eomnplwoeylele-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17–28.
http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016998
[4] Jarden, A. (2011). Positive Psychological Assessment: A practical introduction to empirically validated research
tools for measuring wellbeing. Emotion, (September), 1–48.
[5] Psychology, O. (2010). Working Group on Health and Well-being in the Workplace White Paper –
Psychological well-being at work.
[6] Robertson, I. (2010). Psychological well being at work: Research evidence and current issues.
[7] ‐Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Chemical Information and
Modeling. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[8] Stolk, C. van, Hofman, J., Hafner, M., & Janta, B. (2014). Psychological wellbeing and work: improving service
panrodvision outcomes, (January), 109. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/psychological-wellbeing-and-work-improving-service-provision-
and-outcomes
[9] Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job
performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 84–94. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84