Judul The Effect of Leadership Styles on Organizational Performance

at State Corporations in Kenya

Nama Jurnal International Journal of Business and Commerce
Volume dan Halaman Vol. 2, No.1: Sep 2012[01-12]
Tahun 2012
Penulis Peris M. Koech & Prof. G.S Namusonge
Reviewer Julianto
Tanggal 21 November 2022
Tujuan Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh utama gaya
kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja organisasi pada perusahaan milik
negara di Kenya. Secara khusus, peneltiian ini berusaha untuk
menentukan dampak gaya kepemimpinan laissez-faire,
transaksional, dan transformasional terhadap kinerja organisasi di
perusahaan milik negara di Kenya.
Fenomena Tinjauan penelitian sejarah tentang topik kepemimpinan
mengungkapkan bahwa literatur tentang kepemimpinan dan
kinerja dapat dikategorikan secara luas ke dalam beberapa fase
penting. Studi awal tentang kepemimpinan (sering dikategorikan
sebagai studi 'sifat' tentang kepemimpinan) berkonsentrasi pada
identifikasi ciri-ciri kepribadian yang mencirikan pemimpin yang
sukses.
Dalam pengertian ini, studi awal ini difokuskan pada
mengidentifikasi 'satu cara terbaik untuk memimpin'. Mirip dengan
teori sifat, kelemahan utama teori gaya dan perilaku adalah bahwa
mereka mengabaikan peran penting faktor situasional dalam
menentukan efektivitas pemimpin individu.
Meskipun ringkasan singkat di atas menunjukkan bahwa
penelitian tentang kepemimpinan telah melewati periode
skeptisisme, perhatian baru-baru ini terfokus pada pentingnya
peran kepemimpinan bagi keberhasilan organisasi.
Masalah Penelitian Bagaimana pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja
organisasi pada BUMN di Kenya?
Originalitas Penelitian Locus studi di Kenya
Landasan Teori 1. Teori kepemimpinan
2. Teori kepemimpinan laissez faire
3. Teori kepemimpinan transaksional
4. Teori kepemimpinan transformasional (transformational
leadership)
Konsep atau Teori Konsep dan teori sudah memadai.
(sudah mencakup?) Kerangka penelitian sbb:
Pengembangan Usulan reviewer:
Hipotesis Seharusnya kinerja organisasi dapat diukur dengan perspektif
multidimensi (tidak hanya berasal dari jawaban kuesioner
responden). Perspektif multidimensi yang dimaksud meliputi:
kinerja laba perusahaan (perspektif keuangan), loyalitas
pelanggan (perspekif pemasaran), keberlangsungan rantai pasok
(perspektif operasional), dan hasil audit eksternal (perspektif
risiko.
Populasi/Unit Analisis Sebanyak 77 manajer menyelesaikan kuesioner dari 100
& Jumlah kuesioner yang dibagikan, mewakili tingkat respons 77 persen.
Teknik Sampling Pendapat ahli (minimal 30 responden untuk metode kuesioner)
Jumlah Sampel (jika 30 manajer menangah dan senior di BUMN Kenya.
ada)
Metode Pengumpulan Penelitian survei deskriptif berdasarkan persepsi manajer
Data menengah dan senior di tiga puluh (30) perusahaan milik negara
yang berbasis di Mombasa, Kenya.
Instrumen Kuesioner
Pengumpulan Data
Metode Analisis Data Regresi, korelasi
Variabel Penelitian Laissez faire leadership (X1)
Transactional leadership (X2)
Transformational leadership (X3)
Organizational performance (Y)
Deskripsi Hasil Korelasi antara faktor kepemimpinan transformasional dan
Penelitian peringkat kinerja organisasi tinggi (0,518 hingga 0,696, P < 0,05),
sedangkan korelasi antara perilaku kepemimpinan transaksional
dan kinerja organisasi relatif rendah (0,219 hingga 0,375, P <
0,05). Seperti yang diharapkan, gaya kepemimpinan laissez-faire
tidak berkorelasi signifikan dengan kinerja organisasi.
Perbedaan dan Perbedaan = locus dilakukan di BUMN Kenya
Kesamaan dengan Persamaan = variabel sudah banyak digunakan di penelitian lain
Penelitian Terkait
Hasil Penelitian Hasil penelitian mendukung teori
(mendukung teori
atau tidak)
Hasil Penelitian Menjawab.
(menjawab semua
pertanyaan
penelitian?)
Kontribusi Terbesar Berkontribusi sebagai informasi strategis untuk pengambilan
keputusan di perusahaan-perusahaan Kenya, khususnya di
BUMN.
Keterbatasan Responden hanya sebanyak 77 dari 30 BUMN di Kenya.
Penelitian
Ide lain untuk Penelitian lanjutan pada sektor korporasi (perusahaan swasta)
memecahkan perlu dilakukan untuk menguji apakah variabel yang tidak
masalah yang sama berkolerasi signifikan (laisses faire) berlaku.
dalam penelitian ini
Referensi yang Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1998). Effective Leadership. Interim report on
Digunakan Local Government Management Board. Unpublished. Avolio, B.J.
and Bass, B.M. (2004), Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire:
Manual and Sampler Set, 3rd Ed., Mind Garden, Redwood City,
CA. Barling, J., Weber, T. and Kelloway, E.K. (1996), Effects of
transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial
outcomes: a field experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.
81 No. 6, pp. 827-32. Bass, B.M. (1985) Leadership and
Performance Beyond Expectation. New York: The Free
Press.
Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1993) Transformational Leadership
and Organizational Culture, Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1):
112–17. Bass BM. (1997). Transformational leadership: industry,
military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates. Burns IM. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper
and Row. Cacioppe, R. (1998), An integrated model and approach
for the design of effective leadership development programs,
Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 19 No. 1,
pp. 44-53. Churchill, G.A. (1999). Marketing Research:
Methodological foundations. Seventh Edition. Fort Worth: Dryden
Press. Deluga, R.J. (1992), The relationship of leader-member
exchange with laissez faire, transactional, transformational
leadership in naval environments, in Clark, K.E., Clark, M.B. and
Campbell, D.P. (Eds), Impact of Leadership, Centre of Creative
Leadership, Greensboro, NC, pp. 237-47. Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A
Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fiedler, F.E. (1996). Research on Leadership Selection and
Training: One View of the Future, Administrative Science
Quarterly, 41: 241–50. Furnham, A. (2002). Managers as change
agents. Journal of Change Management, 3(1): 21-29. Harris, L.C.
and Ogbonna, E. (1999). Developing a Market Oriented Culture: A
Critical Evaluation, Journal of Management Studies, in press.
Hennessey, J.T. (1998). Reinventing Government: Does
Leadership Make the Difference?, Public Administration Review,
58(6): 522–32. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. and Johnson, D.E.
(2001), Management of Organizational Behavior, 8th ed., Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. House, R.J. (1977). A 1976 theory of
charismatic leadership. In: J.G. Hunt & L.L. Larsons (eds.)
Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois
University Press, 189-207. Howell JM, Avolio BJ. (1993)
Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of
control, and support for innovations: key predictors of
consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied
Psychology;78(6): 891– 903. Katz, D. and Kahn, R.L. (1978), The
Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed., John Wiley and
Sons, New York, NY. Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. (1992).
Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press.
Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1993). Conducting inter-
organizational research using key informants. Academy of
Management Journal, 36(6): 1633-1651 Likert, R. (1961) New
Patterns of Management . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mahoney, T.A., Jardee, T.H. and Allan, N.N. (1960). Predicting
Managerial Effectiveness, Personnel Psychology, Summer: 147–
63. Mullins, L.J. (1999). Management and Organizational
Behaviour. London: Financial Times. Murphy, P.R., Dalenberg,
D.R. and Daley, J.M. (1990). Improving Survey Responses with
Postcards, Industrial Marketing Management, 19: 349–55.
Nicholls, J. (1988). The Transforming Autocrat, Management
Today, March: 114–18. Quick, J.C. (1992). Crafting an
Organizational Culture: Herb’s Hand at Southwest Airlines,
Organizational Dynamics, 21(2): 45–56. Reger, R.K. (2001). From
the Special Issue Edition: Managing in the information age. Journal
of Management, May, 27(3): 233-234. Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth
Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,
Doubleday Currency, New York, NY. Simms, J. (1997). Beauty
Queen, Marketing Business, March: 48–51. Stogdill, R.M. (1948).
Personal Factors Associated with Leadership, Journal of
Psychology, 25: 35–71. Thorlindsson, T. (1987). The Skipper
Effect in the Icelandic Herring Industry. Reykjavik: University of
Iceland. van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D.
& Hogg, M.A. (2005). Research in leadership, self, and identify: A
sample of the present and a glimpse of the future. The Leadership
Quarterly, 16, 495 – 499. Vroom, V. and Yetton, P. (1974).
Leadership and Decision-Making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
Judul How does the level of experience with disruptive innovation affect firms
adoption rates of disruptive technologies and change of quality of their
products?
Nama Jurnal Paper to be presented at the DRUID Academy conference in Rebild,
Aalborg, Denmark on January 21-23, 2015
(artikel belum terbit di jurnal)
Volume dan Artikel belum terbit di jurnal
Halaman
Tahun 2015
Penulis Oleksii Koval
Reviewer Julianto
Tanggal 13 Oktober 2022
Tujuan This research contributes to the existing academic literature by linking
firm´s adoption of new technologies to NPD performance in markets
characterized by continuous disruptive innovation or technological
discontinuity.
Fenomena Link between Experience and Use of New Technologies. Firms with a
lack of experience with external disruptive innovations may react on
the emergence of these innovations inadequately, and may, for
example, overestimate the extent of a disruptive innovation
(overreaction effect) and as a consequence make wrong decisions
regarding the allocation of firms? resources. This overreaction effect
assumes that inexperienced firms adopt external disruptive
technologies to a greater extent (and more quickly) than experienced
ones. In contrast, by surviving numerous market threats imposed by
disruptive innovations and accumulating knowledge, experienced firms
are able to better understand the advantages and drawbacks of
exploiting prior technologies and adopting emerging ones. Hence, we
assume that: Firms with a higher level of experience with external
disruptive innovation use disruptive technologies in new products to a
greater extent than firms with less experience.
Masalah How does the level of experience with the emergence of external
Penelitian disruptive technologies affect firms’ adoption rates of disruptive
technologies and the quality of their products?
Originalitas Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan baru dalam memecahkan
Penelitian masalah yang diteliti.
Hal ini terlihat dari kerangka pemikiran dan variabel yang digunakan.

Landasan Teori The first domain is based on technology/product innovation life cycle
theory (Anderson and Tushman, 1990; Foster, 1986; Lambe and
Spekman, 1997) whereas the second one is based on theory of
disruptive innovation (Christensen 1997).
Konsep atau Sudah mencukupi (teori yang digunakan adalah teori siklus hidup
Teori (sudah inovasi produk yang dikemukakan oleh oleh Foster tahun 1986.
mencakup?)
Pengembangan Hipotesis sudah memadai.
Hipotesis
Populasi/Unit Population of firms (around 8500 units [Game Spot division of CBS
Analisis & Jumlah Corporation (www.cbscorporation.com)]) and the whole range of
products (video games) (more than 70 000 of units) for four main
platforms (Xbox; PlayStation; Nintendo; PC) for the timeline from 1994
to 2014. After merging the data from Game Rankings and VGchartz
and operationalizing the variables we obtained 5376 observations in
total.
Teknik Sampling The analysis is performed with ordinary list squares regression
technique separately for both samples (1874 and 1155 observations),
and with two different specifications of the independent variable (IV).
Jumlah Sampel 1874 sampel
(jika ada)
Metode Observasi dan kuesioner
Pengumpulan
Data
Instrumen Kuesioner
Pengumpulan
Data
Metode Analisis Pendekatan kuantatiatif dengan statistik regresi
Data
Variabel Dependent variable 1: ‘Change of product quality’.
Penelitian Dependent variable 2: ‘Rate of adoption of disruptive technologies’.
Independent variable: ‘Experience with disruptive technologies’.
Moderating variable: ‘Radicalness of disruptive technologies’.
Deskripsi Hasil the number of the utilized disruptive technologies in the past doesn’t
Penelitian cause any effect on the quality of released products. In contrast, when
firms use the same technology continuously, each new product based
on the same technology will be of a higher quality than its predecessor.
This finding implies that each generation of disruptive technologies
disrupts competencies of firms and all experienced and inexperienced
firms have the same chances to deliver a new successful product on
the market.
Perbedaan dan -
Kesamaan
dengan Penelitian
Terkait
Hasil Penelitian Mendukung teori.
(mendukung teori
atau tidak)
Hasil Penelitian Menjawab pertanyaan penelitian.
(menjawab
semua
pertanyaan
penelitian?)
Kontribusi This research will contribute to the existing academic literature
Terbesar focusing on the behavior and NPD performance of firms which are
repeatedly confronted with disruptive technologies or technological
shifts. Rather than focusing on disruptive technologies which originate
inside the industry, like most studies do, it will yield evidence on the
 behavior and NPD performance of firms when disruptive technologies
originate from outside the industry. The results will provide insights on
the influence of experience with disruptive technologies on the rate of
adoption of disruptive technologies and on the change of product
quality.
Keterbatasan The study will be interesting for those practitioners who operate in
Penelitian industries where technological changes occur frequently and who face
a dilemma whether to invest resources and efforts in exploiting one
certain technology or disperse them for other technologies. It also
shows the influence of experience that firms gain via surviving
sequential emergence of technologies, experience that firms gain
exploiting different generations of disruptive technologies or
experience gained by intensive exploitation of one specific technology
on the quality of products.
Ide lain untuk -
memecahkan
masalah yang
sama dalam
penelitian ini
Referensi yang
Digunakan
Judul Control authority, business strategy, and the characteristics of
management accounting information systems
Nama Jurnal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Volume dan 164 ( 2014 ) 384 – 390
Halaman
Tahun 2014
Penulis Ishak Ramli, Denny Iskandar
Reviewer Julianto
Tanggal 11 Oktober 2022
Tujuan This study aims to examine and analyse the influence of the formal and
informal structures of control authority,
Fenomena Reports are made just for official concern and not for decision making.
Since the information made not for the decision making purposes, there
are many useless reports. On the contrary there are many statistical
reports not be used by the related departments. The crisis information
had not been aware and action taken until the problems raised
themselves. The decision makers received neither on-time, broad
coverage, aggregate information, nor integrated ones.
Masalah 1) How the formal structures control authority
Penelitian 2) How the informal structures control authority
3) How the business strategy influences the characteristics of
management accounting information system positively
Originalitas Peneliti meneruskan variabel MAIS (management accounting information
Penelitian system) yang digunakan oleh Chenhall dan Moris (1986), yang diikuti
oleh Abernathy dan Guthrie (1994), Chong dan Chong Kar (1997), Rudi
(1998), Mardiyah dan Gudono (2000), Rustiana (2001).
Landasan Teori of the firm yang digagas oleh Cyert dan March tahun 1963
Teori
Konsep atau Teori sudah memadai
Teori (sudah
mencakup?)
Pengembanga Hipotesis sudah memadai
n Hipotesis
Populasi/Unit Penelitian memakai populasi top manager perusahaan-perusahaan di
Analisis & Indonesia
Jumlah
Teknik Based on calculations by the Slovin formula, a minimum sample size is
Sampling 195 companies.
Jumlah Sampel Penelitian memakai 430 top managers yang berasal dari 430
(jika ada) perusahaan sebagai responden, sebagian besar dari Jakarta,
Indonesia. Dari 430 responden, 208 telah memberi tanggapan and 195
kuesioner dapat digunakan dalam penelitian ini.
Metode Penyebaran kuesioner
Pengumpulan
Data
Instrumen Kuesioner
Pengumpulan
Data
Metode SEM Model, dengan pendekatan regresi
Analisis Data
Variabel Variabel terikat = management accounting information system (Y)
Penelitian Variabel bebas =
formal structures control authority (X1)
informasl structures control authority (X2)
 business strategy (X3)
Deskripsi Hasil The formal structures control authority(C - Formal) influence the
Penelitian characteristics of MAIS positively significant.
The informal structures control authority (C_Informal) influence the
characteristics of MAIS positively significant.
The business strategy (S_Business) influences the characteristics of
MAIS positively significant.
Perbedaan dan Berbeda
Kesamaan
dengan
Penelitian
Terkait
Hasil Penelitian Hasil penelitian mendukung teori of the firm
(mendukung
teori atau tidak)
Hasil Penelitian Sudah menjawab
(menjawab
semua
pertanyaan
penelitian?)
Kontribusi The business strategy has a very dominant influence on developing the
Terbesar MAIS. The Formal authority is opposite and not in line with the informal
one. Business strategy is more adaptive to the informal authority than the
formal one. This provided that managers’ business strategy moderately
be based not by the formal information provided, but the informal one.
Keterbatasan MAIS (management accounting information system) tidak diberi batasan
Penelitian atau kinerja sistem minimal yang terkandung dalam sistem tersebut.
Setiap sistem informasi akuntansi manajemen tentu berbeda antara satu
perusahaan dengan perusahaan lain, tergantung dari kompleksitas
usaha, keperluan, dan fitur yang dimiliki sistem tersebut.
Ide lain untuk Alternatif variabel terikat yang dapat digunakan adalah standar PSAK
memecahkan yang digunakan.
masalah yang
sama dalam
penelitian ini
Referensi yang
Digunakan