DIREKTORAT BINA TEKNIK JALAN DAN JEMBATAN

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGA

KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT

Webinar Value Engineering

Pelaksanaan VE Selama Loan ESP (Jalan)

Studi Kasus
Feasibility Study (FS) Pembangunan Jalan Akses Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung (Provinsi Jalan)

Muhamad Isnaeni
Tenaga Ahli Transportasi ESP PPC1
 IDENTIFIKASI KEBUTUHAN PROYEK ALASAN DIPERLUKANNYA STUDI KELAYAKAN (FS)
JALAN NASIONAL YANG MENGAKSES PELABUHAN
KUALA TUNGKAL PORT
(pelabuhan pengumpul) UJUNG JABUNG?
PKW KUALA TUNGKAL
• Dalam RIPN (Rencana Induk Pelabuhan Nasional) (Kepmenhub
UJUNG JABUNG PORT
KP 432/2017), Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung ditetapkan sebagai
Pelabuhan Pengumpul (PP). Sesuai pasal 5 (2) dan Pasal 10 (2)
MUARA SABAK PORT
(pelabuhan pengumpul) Permen PU 03/PRT/M/2012, Pelabuhan Pengumpul harus
terhubungkan dengan PKN/PKW oleh Jalan Arteri Primer (JAP)
PKW MUARA SABAK yang statusnya adalah Jalan Nasional.
PLANNED NEW ROAD • Kemenhub sejak Tahun 2014-2019 telah melakukan proses
EXISTING
NATIONAL
(ACCESS ROAD FOR
UJUNG JABUNG PORT)
konstruksi Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung. RPJMN 2020-2024
ROAD (Perpres 8/2020) mentargetkan pada Tahun 2024 Pelabuhan
EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROAD
Ujung Jabung telah siap operasional
KIP KEMINGKING (Muara Sabak – Nipah Panjang)
TALANG DUKU PORT • Dalam perkembangannya, penyelesaian Pelabuhan Ujung
(pelabuhan utama)
Jabung terkendala (1) keterbatasan pendanaan di Kemenhub,
EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROAD
PKN JAMBI
(Jambi-Suak Kandis-Simpang) (2) lahan pelabuhan yang belum tuntas serah terimanya dari
Daerah, (3) jalan akses belum terbangun
• Sudah pernah dilakukan studi Kelayakan (FS) dan Perencanaan
ALASAN PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG DIBANGUN? Teknis (DED) Jalan Akses Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung (yang
• Tiga pelabuhan terbesar yang operasional saat ini di Provinsi Jambi dilakukan Dinas PU Provinsi Jambi pada Tahun 2009/2013),
(Talang Duku, Muara Sabak, dan Kuala Tungkal) berada di alur sungai namun perlu dikaji kembali karena sudah melebihi 5 tahun
(inland waterway) cenderung mengalami pendangkalan sehingga kapal • Salah satu persyaratan siap operasinya suatu pelabuhan adalah
besar sulit berlabuh yang menyebabkan berkurangnya efektivitas tersedianya akses jalan pelabuhan, sehingga harus ada
logistik barang dari/ke Provinsi Jambi percepatan dalam penyediaan dokumen pendukung (readiness
• Rencana Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung merupakan pelabuhan laut (sea port) criteria) bagi pelaksanaan pembangunan jalan akses Pelabuhan
yang diharapkan dapat menjadi outlet utama Provinsi Jambi Ujung Jabung
2
POSISI STRATEGIS JALAN AKSES PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG

PKW KUALA TUNGKAL

ALTERNATIF 1
Jambi – Muara Sabak - Pelabuhan
Nipah Panjang- Ujung Jabung Ujung Jabung

NIPAH
PANJANG

PKW MUARA SABAK

Jembatan
Nipah Panjang
(Rencana)
IC Merlung
MERLUNG Jembatan
ALTERNATIF 3 Sei Rambut
Jambi-Suak Kandis (Rencana)
SIMPANG
(via Kemingking)-Simpang
-Ujung Jabung
ALTERNATIF 4
Jambi – Muara Sabak -
SUAK KANDIS Simpang -Ujung Jabung
IC Cinto
Kenang
Pelabuhan
SP NIAM Talang Duku
ALTERNATIF 2
KIP Kemingking
Jambi-Suak Kandis (via Sipin) –
PKN Simpang - Ujung Jabung
JAMBI

Akses Gerbang Utama

KETERANGAN:
KIP Kemingking
IC NESS
(usulan PT. JKE) : Rencana Jalan Tol
: Jalan Nasional (AP)
M. BULIAN Bandara Akses Tol
Sultan Thaha KIP Kemingking : Jalan Nasional (KP)
M. TEMBESI (usulan PT. JKE) : Jalan Provinsi
IC Jambi
: Rencana Akses Jalan
Tempino Pel Ujung Jabung (baru)
: Usulan Akses Jalan
KIP Kemingking
: Rencana Jalan Kabupaten
: Pelabuhan Pengumpul
: Pelabuhan Regional

3
 HASIL FS JALAN AKSES JAMBI - PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG
(Dinas PU Provinsi Jambi 2009)
PETA LOKASI KEGIATAN PETA ALTERNATIF RUTE PETA RUTE 2 ALTERNATIF TERPILIH

DESKRIPSI ALTERNATIF RUTE ANALISIS MULTI KRITERIA (AMK) PEMILIHAN RUTE ALTERNATIF TERPILIH

• Dari hasil penilaian dan masukan dari

berbagai pihak/instansi terkait maka,
terpilih rute alternatif ke 2 dengan Nilai
MF = 7,05 (TERTINGGI)
• Panjang jalan alternatif 2 sebesar 154
km, Jalan alternatiF 2 tersebut trasenya
sebagian besar melalui daerah datar,
jumlah tikungan tajam sangat sedikit,
dan sungai yang dilalui oleh alternatif ini
sangat sedikit jika dibandingan dengan
alternatif rute jalan yang lain.
4
 METODOLOGI/TAHAPAN PELAKSANAAN
Tahapan umum sesuai Pedoman FS Jalan dan Jembatan (PD T-19-2005-B) Tahapan Umum Pelaksanaan Value Engineering

1. Preparation
Identification of related policies Identification of land use and Identification of land
and development objectives environment policies acquisition policies

2. Information

Alternatives solution formulation

3. Analysis

Data collection
4. Creation

Geology & Hydrology &

Traffic Topography Environment & Safety
Geotechnical drainage 5. Idea Selection Terdapat urutan tahapan kerja yang
berbeda antara FS dan VE:
• Di FS dirumuskan dahulu alternatif
solusi atas masalah, sehingga dapat
6. Development
Analysis diketahui kebutuhan data untuk
survei di lapangan
• Di VE (karena data diasumsikan
Geology & 7. Evaluation & Presentation berasal dari eskternal (Tim
Traffic Geometric Pavement Bridge Economy Environment
Geotechnical Pelaksana)), alternative dirumuskan
setelah mendapatkan data dan
8. Conclusion & Recommendation proses analisis

Feasibility Evaluation ADA KESULITAN UNTUK MENDAPATKAN

DATA TAMBAHAN KETIKA ADA
9. Implementation ALTERNATIF BARU YANG MUNCUL
Recommendation DALAM VE
 Step 1 Preparation (Tahap 1 Persiapan)
Tim Kerja VE
Rencana Kerja (Job Plan) (Stakeholders Analysis)
dokumen terperinci untuk menjalankan Stakeholders for the VE
lokakarya VE (workshop VE) study are categorized
into 4 categories:
1. Project Team
2. Decision Maker
3. Think Along
4. Being informed

stakeholders cenderung
sulit menyediakan waktu
untuk selalu hadir dalam
seluruh sesi workshop
secara on-line

Jika workshop dilakukan

secara OFF-LINE ada
kemungkinan stakeholders
Realisasi: Realisasi: Realisasi: Realisasi:
bisa konsisten hadir?
22 November 2021 23 November 2021 25 November 2021 21 Desember 2021
Tetapi perlu jaminan
29 Desember 2021
DURASI HARI WORKSHOP
11 Januari 2022
SESUAI DENGAN JADUAL
 Step 2 Information Phase (Tahap 2 Informasi)
All relevant stakeholders gathered in one virtual room. All relevant information that is available was shared. Shared information consisted
of existing infrastructures of Ujung Jabung Port, Kemingking area development, tourism potential near Ujung Jabung Port, construction and
maintenance of provincial road.

1. Geotechnical risk
Each alternative road trace from
Jambi city to Ujung Jabung will
cross through peat with soft soil.
This risk will impact the life cycle
cost of the project (potentially
high maintenance cost is
expected).
2. Investment risk
Funding for the port was stopped
2021. Impact of the risk is that the
Ujung Jabung Road Access will
lose its primary function if the
Ujung Jabung Port is not
operated. The VE study are
considering the mitigation of such
scenario in the recommendations.
3. Over dimension and over load
When Ujung Jabung Port entering
the operational period, the VE
team identified that there’s a
chance of heavy loading vehicle
which will damage the road,
causing an increase in
maintenance cost.
4. Flood
The project are situated in 2
catchment areas: catchment area
sungai Berbak and catchment
area sungai Batanghari (see
Figure 1-5. Catchment area of the
project). Therefore there is a flood
potential in the project area.
ASPEK GEOLOGI WILAYAH
PETA GEOLOGI REGIONAL WILAYAH KAJIAN
Sumber: Peta Geologi Regional Prov. Jambi (ESDM)
Aluvium : Kerakal, kerikil, pasir, lanau dan lempung
Endapan Rawa: Pasir, lanau, lempung, dan gambut
Formasi Kasai: Perselingan antara batupasir tufaan dan batu lempung tufaan
Formasi Muara Enim : Perselingan antara batupasir tufan dan batulempung tufan,
perselingan batupasir kuarsa dan batulempung kuarsa, bersisipan batubara dan oksida besi
PETA SEBARAN TANAH LUNAK DAN BATULEMPUNG BERMASALAH
Sumber: Peta Sebaran Tanah Lunak Prov. Jambi (ESDM)
Gambut dan tanah Organik
Sebaran umumnya menempati dataran rawa-rawa, dengan kemiringan lereng <2%, sifat fisik:
konsistensi sangat lunak (Merupakan material dari Formasi Alluvium dan Endapan Rawa)
Sebaran Batulempung Bermasalah
Batulempung berumur tersier dan terendapkan di lingkungan laut. Memiliki sifat
kembang-susut. (Merupakan Material/Batulempung dari Formasi Muara Enim)
8
 KEMAJUAN PEMBANGUNAN
RENCANA PENGOPERASIAN
PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG DALAM RENCANA INDUK PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG (KM 43/2019)
KEMAJUAN DAN RENCANA PENUNTASAN PEMBANGUNAN PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG HINTERLAND PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG

Dolphin (Area Sandar Kapal)

Dolphin (Area Sandar Kapal)

PROYEKSI BONGKAR MUAT DAN LALULINTAS KAPAL DI PELABUHAN UJUNG JABUNG

Area Daratan

Total APBN sd 2019 = Rp 226,77 M

Renstra 2020-2024 = Rp 80,00 M
Total APBN sd 2024 = Rp 306,77 M

Pengembangan selanjutnya
direncanakan melalui skema KPBU

APBN Th 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

dialokasikan untuk menyelesaikan
penimbunan area daratan (dan
pengerasannya), bangunan kantor,
stockyard, bunker, conveyor, pipa,
serta fasilitas lainnya agar pelabuhan
Ujung Jabung dapat dioperasikan
minimal untuk melayani angkutan
curah (CPO dan batubara)

Sumber: Paparan KUPP Nipah Panjang, Senin 15 Februari 2021 9

ASPEK HIDROLOGI
DATA TINGGI MUKA AIR (TMA) DI POS DUGA TERDEKAT PERHITUNGAN CATCHMENT AREA SUNGAI

CATCHMENT AREA SUNGAI BATANGHARI

• Semua alternatif rute jalan akses Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung berada pada catchment area
sungai Batanghari dan Berbak
• Lokasi potensi banjir paling besar untuk Cathment Area Sungai Batanghari berada pada
area di sekitar Kota Jambi, Sipin, Rantau Panjang, Simpang, Berbak, Nipah Panjang
• Lokasi potensi banjir paling besar untuk Cathment Area Sungai Berbak berada pada
area di sekitar Lambur, Rantau Rasau, dan Simpang CATCHMENT AREA SUNGAI BERBAK 10
Step 3 Analysis (Tahap 3 Analysis) How FAST Diagram of Ujung Jabung Port Road Access Project Why
The functions of the road and the project, resulting in the
FAST function diagram. The main functions of this system as
identified by the VE team were:
1. Transport goods and people from Jambi city to Ujung
Jabung Port

Meanwile the VE team also identified the main function of

Ujung Jabung Port (super-system):
2. Facilitate large vessels (from 1.500 gT to 5.000gT).
3. Develop the economy of isolated area
Step 3 Analysis (Tahap 3 Analysis) FPS Road Access Ujung Jabung Port

connectivity Provide access

to isolated area

economy Increase regional

economy

maintenance serviceability

Construction cost

Life cycle cost

Carry vehicle

Connect people

Connect people
 Step 4 Ideas Creation (Tahap 4 Kreasi Ide-Ide)

After having the functions and 1. How to cross soft soil and peat, improve soil 2. How to drain water (mitigate flood)? 3. How to optimize cut and fill soil?
performances defined, there was a bearing capacity?
brainstorm on everything that can
achieve the same functions and
performances, but different from the
original plan. There were 12 topics.

In the next table, the topics are

mentioned, including how many ideas
are generated for each topic, plus the
first evaluation if the ideas may be
viable or certainly not (do, don’t do):
1. Cross soft soil and peat, improve
soil bearing capacity (19 do, 1
don’t)
2. Drain water (13 do, 1 don’t)
4. How to prevent ODOL? 5. How to transport people and goods 6. How to raise IRR of the Road Project?
3. Cut and fill soil (5 do, 1 don’t)
from Jambi to Ujung Jabung Port?
4. Prevent overloading and
overdimention (11 do, 4 don’t)
5. Transport goods and people from
Jambi city to Ujung Jabung Port (9
do, 4 don’t)
6. Raise IRR of the road project (40
do, 25 don’t)
7. Other idea (11 do, 2 don’t)
Step 5 Idea Selection (Tahap 5 Seleksi Ide)
The best ideas are selected for further elaboration. In total 139 ideas (some minor, some major, some within the
scope of the project, some outside the scope; selected when they improve the functions or the performances).

Below is a selection of the ideas that were generated from the VE team.

PERTANYAAN IDE YANG DIPILIH

1. How to Cross soft soil and peat, improve soil bearing capacity 1. Use bamboo (cerucuk)
2. How to drain water/mitigate flood 2. Raise embankment above the flooding water level
3. How to Minimize Cut and fill soil 3. Use pile-slab
4. How to Prevent overloading and overdimention 4. WIM bridge (Jembatan timbang)
5. How to Transport goods and people from Jambi to Ujung Jabung Port 5. Use river/water transport
6. Raise IRR of the road project 6. Make new tourism area
7. PPP/concession (KPBU)
7. Other idea
8. Bundling investment

• VE Team juga melakukan investigasi lebih lanjut mengenai potensi dan kendala alternatif menggunakan moda transportasi
sungai/perairan untuk mentransportasikan barang dan penumpang dari Kota Jambi ke Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung
• Ide yang dipilih tersebut diatas digunakan lebih lanjut sebagai kombinasi ide untuk pengembangan alternatif maupun
maupun dijadikan sebagai rekomendasi tindaklanjut (jika ide tersebut terkait dengan aspek kebijakan investasi maupun
pengelolaan dan pengoperasian
 Step 6 Alternative Development (Tahap 6 Pengembangan Alternatif)
The main aim of this section is to explain and describe scenarios and the cost (construction, maintenance, and total cost). There are
7 alternatives scored by the VE team with one additional scenario (do nothing) as a comparison:
Segmen Panjang Penjelasan
1 Alternatif Do – Nothing
2 Alternatif Do-Minimum (hanya membangun jembatan Sei Rambut
3 Alternatif 1 Jambi-Muara Sabak-Nipah Panjang-Ujung Jabung
a+b+c1+c2+d 145,3 km Mengikuti alternatif terpilih dalam d
b c2
FS Provinsi Tahun 2009
c1
4 Alternatif 3 Jambi-Kemingking-Suak Kandis-Simpang-Ujung Jabung
f+h+i+d 129,9 km Optimalisasi jalan Kabupaten i
(mengakomodasi Kawasan Industri e
Prioritas Kemingking) a
5 Alternatif 4 Jambi-Muara Sabak-Simpang-Ujung Jabung
a+b+e+i+d 155,0 km Optimalisasi jalan nasional dan h
mengikuti DED Provinsi 2013
(sudah ada progress lahan dan
Keterangan:
konstruksi) f = Alternatif 1
6 Aternatif 1 + Alternatif 1 ditambah dengan jalan
= Alternatif 3
Akses ke KI Kemingking + Access
= Alternatif 4
7 Alternatif 4+ Alternatif 4 ditambah dengan jalan = Jembatan Eksisting
Akses ke KI Kemingking = Jembatan Sei Rambut (rencana)
= Jembatan Nipah Panjang (rencana)
Keterangan: = pelabuhan
• Segmen a merupakan jalan nasional eksisting (Jambi-Muara Sabak)
• Segmen b dan c1 merupakan jalan Provinsi eksisting (Muara Sabak-Nipah Panjang)
• Segmen g dan h merupakan jalan Provinsi eksisting (Jambi-Suak Kandis-Simpang)
• Segmen C2, d, e, d, dan i merupakan rencana jalan baru
Keterangan: lokasi titik awal dan titik akhir proyek serta alternative rute jalan akses Pelabuhan Ujung Jabung
sudah diasistensikan dan disepakati dalam Berita Acara antara Tim PPC1 dengan BPJN IV Jambi
 Step 6 Alternative Development (Tahap 6 Pengembangan Alternatif)
The main aim of this section is to explain and describe scenarios and the cost (construction, maintenance, and total cost). There are
7 alternatives scored by the VE team with one additional scenario (do nothing) as a comparison:

No Alternative Description Pro’s Con’s Implementation Plan Cost

1 Alternative do The construction of Sei Rambut bridge - Lowest life cycle cost:1 - Abutment might The implementation - Construction/
minimum: will enable the connectivity for the area trillion Rupiah subjected to settlement plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sei Rambut Bridge surrounding Ujung Jabung area, while - Maximum connectivity: that causing different in DED phase Rp.0.3 trillion
decreasing a negligible amount of cost 26.307 people elevation of each - Maintenance cost:
of transport (around 1.7% compared to connected abutment Rp.0.7 trillion
do nothing) - Highest EIRR: 26.7% - Life cycle cost (20
years): Rp.1 trillion
2 Alternative 1 This alternative utilize the existing - Less flooding: 21% - Lowest connectivity: The implementation - Construction/
(Jambi-Muara National Road Jambi-Muara Sabak. Will length of the road are 19.952 people connected plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sabak-Nipah connect ~20.000 people in the isolated not potentially subjected after this alternative Rp.1.4 trillion
Panjang-Ujung area. 21% length of the road are not to flooding is chosen - Maintenance cost:
Jabung) potentially subjected to flooding. This - Low maintenance cost: Rp.1.3 trillion
alternative will potentially 1.3trillion/20 years - Life cycle cost (20
generating 15.5% EIRR in 2034 (because - Low life cycle cost: years): Rp.2.8 trillion
can reduce 6.8% cost of transport) 2.8trillion/20 years
3 Alternative 3 This alternative connect Kemingking - Lowest cost of transport - Prone to flooding: only The implementation - Construction/
(Jambi-Kemingking- area to Ujung Jabung directly, shortest (1.565 trillion rupiah, 12.5% length of the road plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sei Rambut-Ujung route, connect most people in the reducing 9.8% cost of are not potentially after this alternative Rp.1.7trillion
Jabung isolated area. This alternative will transport compared to subjected to flooding is chosen - Maintenance cost:
potentially generating 15.7% do nothing) - Highest construction/ Rp.1.8 trillion
EIRR in 2034 - Maximum connectivity: investment cost: Rp.1.7 T - Life cycle cost (20
26.307 people - Highest maintenance cost: years): Rp.3.6 trillion
connected Rp.1.8 trillion/20 years
- Highest life cycle cost:
Rp.3.6 trillion
 Step 6 Alternative Development (Tahap 6 Pengembangan Alternatif)
The main aim of this section is to explain and describe scenarios and the cost (construction, maintenance, and total cost). There are
7 alternatives scored by the VE team with one additional scenario (do nothing) as a comparison:

No Alternative Description Pro’s Con’s Implementation Plan Cost

4 Alternative 4 This alternative utilize most of provincial - Maximum connectivity: The implementation - Construction/
(Jambi-Suak Kandis- road an existing construction progress 26.307 people connected plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sei Rambut-Ujung by Jambi Government. connect ~26.000 - Low investment cost: 1.3 after this alternative Rp.1.3trillion
Jabung) people in the isolated area. 19.1% trillion Rupiah is chosen - Maintenance cost:
length of the road are not potentially to - Low life cycle cost: Rp.1.4 trillion
flooding. This alternative will potentially 2.8trillion/20 years - Life cycle cost (20
generating 15.2% EIRR in 2034 years): Rp.2.8 trillion
5 Alternative 1+ This alternative utilize the existing - Less flooding: ~21% - Lowest connectivity: The implementation - Construction/
(Jambi-Muara National Road Jambi-Muara Sabak and length of the road are not 19.952 people connected plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sabak-Nipah giving access to Kemingking Industrial potentially subjected to after this alternative Rp.1.5 trillion
Panjang-Ujung Area to Jambi Port (with 5km additional flooding is chosen - Maintenance cost:
Jabung, plus Access road) This alternative have nearly the - High EIRR in term of Rp.1.4 trillion
road to Kemingking) same performance with alternative 1 overall road trace: 18% in - Life cycle cost (20
except for the EIRR (18% in 2034). 2034 years): Rp.2.9 trillion
6 Alternative 4+ This alternative utilize most of provincial - High EIRR in term of The implementation - Construction/
(Jambi-Suak Kandis- road an existing construction progress overall road trace: ~18% plan will be detailed investment cost:
Sei Rambut-Ujung by Jambi Government. and giving access in 2034 (17.7% to be after this alternative Rp.1.4 trillion
Jabung, plus Access to Kemingking Industrial Area to Jambi exact) is chosen - Maintenance cost:
road to Kemingking) Port (with 5km additional road). - Maximum connectivity: Rp.1.5 trillion
26.307 people connected - Life cycle cost (20
years): Rp.2.9 trillion
7 Alternative 5: Optimizing the usage of existing port, - Highest EIRR: 41.3% - Highest maintenance Investigate the - Construction/
Water/river instead of building Ujung Jabung Port. (2034) cost: Rp. 2 trillion water/river transport investment cost:
transport This alternative will reduce 9% cost of - Little investment - No connectivity for the potential further Rp.0.5 trillion
transport This alternative donot connect /construction cost is people living nearby - Maintenance cost:
people in the isolated area by road needed: Rp.0.5 trillion Ujung Jabung area Rp.2.0 trillion
- Lowest cost of transport: - Life cycle cost (20
1.579 trillion rupiah/year years): Rp.2.5 trillion
 Step 7 Evaluation (Tahap 7 Evaluasi)
The scoring of the scenarios is done by the VE team using the Choosing By Advantages (CBA) method. CBA is a method that
enables easy decision making for complex projects.

Scoring of the alternatives for Ujung Jabung Road Access Project. Performance is the total of “score * weight” of each criteria. Life cycle cost is calculated for 20
years for all alternatives. Value score is the ratio between performance and life cycle cost. EIRR – economic internal rate of return is the investment rate of
return; EIRR is not included in value score.
Step 8 Conclusion and Recommendation (Tahap 8 Kesimpulan dan Rekomendasi)
Conclusion
• Do Nothing might have a high value score, but there is no EIRR potential; it
indicates that the existing condition is good enough, but it doesn’t have any
significant growth potential on the economy.
• Do minimum (Sei Rambut Bridge) has the second highest value score and
highest EIRR, because the bridge enables people to commute with land
vehicle and therefore reduce the travel time (around 40%). The bridge
achieves such performance by only costing 0.3 billion Rupiah (1 trillion
Rupiah in LCC Cost). Therefore we recommend the decision maker to
choose Do Minimum.
• Alternative 4 have the third highest value score, with typical EIRR,
compared to other road alternatives. Alternative 4 also cover the “Do
Minimum” Scenario, since Sei Rambut Bridge located in “I” section.
Therefore we recommend the decision maker to choose alternative 4 (or
4+).
• The + variant of the alternatives (1+ and 4+) scored less than the normal
variant (1 and 4). This happens because the 5km of road that connect
Kemingking to the nearest port are prone to flooding, and therefore reduce
the performance. Despite the negligible reduction in performance, the +
variant alternatives have higher EIRR than the normal variant, hence we
recommend the decision maker to choose alternative 4+.
• Water/river transport has the highest EIRR despite the lack of performance.
It happens because the performance parameters (and their functions) are
customed into road design parameter. Therefore, we recommend the
decision maker to investigate the river/water transport mode.
 Step 8 Conclusion and Recommendation (Tahap 8 Kesimpulan dan Rekomendasi)
Recommendation
The VE Team recommend the following action
sequence to be taken by the decision maker:
1. Investigate the potential of river transport. If the
decision maker is not eager to investigate the
potential of the river transport, then:
2. Construct Sei Rambut Bridge.
3. After the Ujung Jabung Port is constructed (and
operational), construct alternative 4
4. After Kemingking area is constructed (and
operational), add 5km of road to connect
kemingking with Talang Duku Port (alternative 4+)
Insights gained during the VE-study about river transport
1. In general: costs for transport are a waste of money and do
not add value to the product. Therefore, the cheapest way of
transport should be chosen to stimulate the economy best.
2. Transport by river. Although this was actually out of scope for
this VE-study, the VE-team gained insights that may provide a
healthier economic future for Ujung Jabung port and Jambi
Region.
3. Since costs for transport to Muara Sabak by truck are much
lower than to Ujung Jabung, producers will not easily chose
Ujung Jabung as their primary choice. Consider to do
transport by truck to Muara Sabak and if needed make a
deep harbour there. Ujung Jabung might be designated for
transfer of local produce to sea transport.
4. Consider to further investigate transport over the rivers
because that is much cheaper and will stimulate the
economy of Jambi region much better than driving by truck
to harbour Ujung Jabung.
Step 9 Implementation (Tahap 9 Implementasi/Tindak Lanjut)
This section contains how these recommendations can be implemented (what, who, where, when), or what is needed so
alternatives can be implemented.

Direkomendasikan kepada Kementerian Perhubungan

untuk melakukan kajian lebih lanjut

Sedang dilakukan oleh TIM PPC5-ESP

Perlu dikonfirmasi kembali dengan Kementerian

Perhubungan terkait Persyaratan Penyelesaian
Pelabuhan setelah Tersedia Jalan Akses

Termasuk aksesnya ke Jalan Tol Trans Sumatera