ABSTRAK
Kulit pisang dan bekatul merupakan limbah yang memiliki potensi besar sebagai sumber serat
pangan. Telah dilakukan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui formula terbaik dari serbuk
minuman instan pada perbandingan pektin kulit pisang kepok dengan bekatul yang memiliki kadar serat
tinggi dan disukai oleh panelis. Formulasi yang digunakan sebagai perlakuan dengan perbandingan pektin
kulit pisang kepok dan bekatul adalah F1 (1,5g:2,5g), F2 (2g:2g) dan F3 (2,5g:1,5g). Pektin kulit pisang
kepok (Musa x paradisiaca) dengan lama ekstraksi 120 menit memiliki rendemen 5%, kadar air 7,96,
kadar abu 8,5199%, berat ekivalen 705,08, kadar metoksi 4,8538%, dan derajat esterifikasi 54,218%,
kadar serat F1 21,39%, kadar serat F2 18,79%, kadar serat F3 16,20%, kadar serat pektin 8,41%, kadar
serat bekatul 35,87%.Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa warna pada formula 1 dan 2 lebih disukai
dibandingkan formula 3. Hasil analisis sidik ragam minuman serbuk minuman instan formula 1 dan 2
berbeda nyata dengan formula 3. Aroma serbuk minuman instan formula 3 lebih disukai dan berbeda
nyata dibandingkan dengan formula 1 dan 2. Rasa serbuk minuman instan formula 1, formula 2 dan
formula 3 tidak berbeda nyata.
Kata Kunci : Serbuk Minuman Instan, Pektin, Bekatul, Serat Pangan
ABSTRAC
The banana shell and ricebrand are waste that have great potential as a source of dietary fiber. The
formulation that used to a treatment with pectin ratio shell of kepok banana and ricebrand and were F1
(1.5G: 2.5G), F2 (2g: 2g) and F3 (2.5G: 1.5G). Pectin kepok banana shell (Musa x paradisiaca) with 120
minutes extraction has a yield 5%, water content 7,96%, ash content 8.5199%, equivalent weight 705.08,
a methoxy content 4.8538%, and the degree of esterification 54.218% , the fiber content F1 21.39%,
18.79% fiber content F2, F3 fiber content 16.20%, pectin fiber content 8.41%, fiber content of ricebrand
35.87%. The result of analysis showed that the color on the formula 1 and 2 were preferred than formula
3. The results of analysis of variance instant beverage powder formula 1 and 2 are significantly different
with the formula 3. The aroma of instant beverage powder formula 3 preferably and significantly different
compared to Formula 1 and 2. The taste of instant powder formula 1, formula 2 and formula 3 were not
significantly different