id/PMNJ/index
PSYCHIATRY NURSING JOURNAL
(Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa)
Vol. 1, No. 1, Maret 2019
ABSTRAK
RIWAYAT ARTIKEL
Diterima: 04 Desember 2019 Pendahuluan: Pola asuh orang tua sangat berpengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan dan
Disetujui: 23 Desember 2019 perkembangan anak, apalagi jika pada anak mengalami autis. Umumnya orang tua yang
memiliki anak autis mengalami stres, oleh karena itu bagaimana program pemberian
parenting sangat penting dikaji agar orang tua dapat memperlakukan anak autis dalam
KONTAK PENULIS mencapai perkembangan optimalnya. Systematic review ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan
pengaruh program parenting dalam mengurangi stres orang tua dengan anak autis.
Ah Yusuf
yusuf_fkp_unair@yahoo.co.id Metode: Pencarian jurnal dilakukan pada database Scopus dan Sience Direct, pembatasan
Fakultas Keperawatan, jurnal pada 10 tahun terakhir mulai 2008-2017, area jurnal Nursing, Psychologi, Disabilitas,
Universitas Airlangga Child, dan Psychiatri dengan kata kunci Parenting, Parent Stress and Autism. Prosedur
seleksi dan ekstraksi data menggunakan pendekatan PICOT.
Hasil: Total keseluruhan partisipan dari seluruh penelitian yang diriview adalah 2107
dengan orangtua yang mengalami kecemasan atau stress akibat memiliki anak autis.
Intervensi yang digunakan dalam semua penelitian adalah intervensi program parenting
dan support parenting. Rerata durasi interfensi selama 3 minggu dengan rerata follow up
12 bulan. Efek signifikan ditemukan secara statistik dari program parenting atau support
parenting untuk hasil pasca pemberian intervensi hingga follow up. Hasil yang signifikan
ditemukan pada pemberian program parenting melalui media konseling peneliti di
dampingi oleh terapis yang bersertifikat.
Kesimpulan: Parenting memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan dalam menurunkan stres pada
orang tua yang memiliki anak autis.
Kata Kunci
parenting; parents; stress; autism.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Parenting is very influential in the growth and development of children,
especially if the child has autism. Generally, parents who have autistic children experience
stress, therefore how the parenting program is very important to be studied so that parents
can treat autistic children in achieving optimal development. This Systematic review aims
to explain the effect of parenting programs in reducing the stress of parents with autistic
children.
Method: The journal search was conducted on the Scopus and Science Direct databases,
journal restrictions in the last ten years starting 2008-2017, the journal areas of Nursing,
Psychology, Disability, Child, and Psychiatry with the keywords Parenting, Parent Stress and
Autism. Data selection and extraction procedures use the PICOT approach.
Results: The total number of participants from all studies reviewed was 2107, with parents
experiencing anxiety or stress due to having an autistic child. The interventions used in all
research were parenting program interventions and parenting support. The average
duration of intervention was three weeks with a mean follow-up of 12 months. Significant
effects were found statistically from parenting programs or parenting support for outcomes
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
Kutip sebagai: Fitriasari, A., Yusuf, A., & Kholidah, N. (2019). Pengaruh Program Parenting dalam
Mengurangi Stres Orang Tua dengan Anak Autis. Psych. Nurs. J., 1(1).
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
(PT: β = .68, p <.001; PEP: β = .49, p orang tua yang memiliki anak autism
<.001).dan hasil dari program Training spectrum disorder yang di berikan oleh
Parenting di dapatkan Hasil ini pada terapis. Hal ini dapat dijadikan acuan
tindak lanjut (T = 1,50; z = 3,20; P <. 001) untuk penelitian selanjutnya yang
(Ilg et al., 2016). disesuaikan dengan kriteria orang tua
Adanya perubahan tingkat stress yang mengalami stress saat memberikan
pola asuh pada anak autism spectrum
pada orang tua setelah di berikan program
disorder di Indonesia.
parenting (F[2,30] = 3,69; P <.05). ada
peningkatan keterampilan sosialisasi pada
anak (2F = 20,26; (P <.001), dan untuk 7. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
hasil Co-Parenting Program di dapatkan
hasil pada tingkat stress pre dan post co Craig, F. et al. (2016) ‘Parenting stress
program adalah PSI (P<0,001) (Thullen & among parents of children with
Bonsall, 2017) dan untuk Program Neurodevelopmental Disorders’,
parenting terdapat efek univariat yang Psychiatry Research. Elsevier, 242,
signifikan dengan Orang tua di kelompok pp. 121–129. doi:
perlakuan melaporkan penurunan 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.016.
masalah pada anak dengan perilaku, ECBI García-lópez, C., Sarriá, E. and Pozo, P.
skala, F (1,57) = 19,81, p <0. 001, η2 = 0,26 (2016) ‘Research in Autism
dan ECBI skala masalah, F (1, 57) = 10.93, Spectrum Disorders Multilevel
p <0. 002, η2 = 0,16.Skala Parenting approach to gender differences in
termasuk Skala Laxness,F (1,57) = 15.85, p adaptation in father-mother dyads
<0,001, η2 = 0,22, reaktifitas lebih skala, F parenting individuals with Autism
(1, 57) = 19,14, p <0,001, η2 = 0,25 dan
Spectrum Disorder’, Research in
Verbositas Skala, F (1, 57) = 10.72, p <0,01,
Autism Spectrum Disorders.
η2 = 0,16 (Whittingham, Sofronoff,
Elsevier Ltd, 28, pp. 7–16. doi:
Sheffield, & Sanders, 2009).
10.1016/j.rasd.2016.04.003.
Hemdi, A. and Daley, D. (2017) ‘The
5. IMPLIKASI Effectiveness of a Psychoeducation
Intervention delivered via
Hasil dari review berbagai penelitian
WhatsApp for mothers of children
dapat diimplikasikan dalam ranah
with Autism Spectrum Disorder
keperawatan jiwa. Yang mana program
(ASD) in the Kingdom of Saudi
parenting dapat menjadi pertimbangan
Arabia: A randomized controlled
dan pengembangan terapi yang dapat di
trial’, Child: Care, Health and
gunakan oleh ners spesialis. Adanya
Development, 43(6), pp. 933–941.
program parenting dengan berbagai jenis
doi: 10.1111/cch.12520.
terapi dapat dijadikan sebuah inovasi
Hill-chapman, C. R., Herzog, T. K. and
dalam intervensi keperawatan khususnya
Maduro, R. S. (2013) ‘Research in
keperawatan jiwa. Namun dalam
Developmental Disabilities
pengaplikasiannya di Indonesia perlu
Aligning over the child : Parenting
dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut dengan
alliance mediates the association of
menyesuaikan karakteristik klien yang
autism spectrum disorder
ada di Indonesia.
atypicality with parenting stress’,
Research in Developmental
Disabilities. Elsevier Ltd, 34(5), pp.
1498–1504. doi:
6. KESIMPULAN 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.004.
Iadarola, S. et al. (2017) ‘Teaching Parents
Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa
Behavioral Strategies for Autism
pemberian program parenting memiliki
pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Effects
perubahan pola asuh, dan stress pada on Stress, Strain, and Competence’,
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
D. CAESARIA ET AL.
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/PNJ |
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
ABSTRAK
Interaksi sosial adalah hubungan manusia dengan manusia lainnya atau hubungan manusia dengan
kelompok atau hubungan kelompok dengan kelompok. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk
menganalisis pengaruh intervensi terapi musik terhadap kemampuan interaksi sosial pada anak
autisme. Metode penelitian berupa systematic review ini dimulai dari pencarian data menggunakan 5
database yaitu Science Direct, PuBmed, SAGE, Taylor & Francis Online (Tandfonline), dan Google
Scholar dengan rentang tahun 2013-2020 dengan jumlah 1.031 artikel. Ditemukan 9 artikel yang
memenuhi kriteria yang dinilai menggunakan the JBI critical appraisal tools. Hasil telaah artikel yang
telah dilakukan adalah terapi musik diberikan dengan berbagai metode seperti improvisasi,
mendengarkan musik, dan menyanyi. Jenis musik yang diberikan adalah murrotal Al-Qur’an, musik
klasik, dan musik instrumental. Kesimpulan dari telaah artikel ini adalah metode yang bisa diberikan
adalah metode improvisasi dengan durasi waktu minimal 30 menit dan durasi waktu maksimal adalah
60 menit. Jenis musik yang bisa diberikan adalah murrotal Al-Qur’an dan musik klasik. Rekomendasi
dalam penelitian adalah melakukan intervensi terapi musik dengan metode improvisasi, jenis musik
murrotal Al-Qur’an dan musik klasik.
ABSTRACT
Social interaction was the relationship between humans and other humans or human relations with
groups or group relations with groups. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of music
therapy intervention on social interaction skill in children with autism. The research method in the
form of a systematic review started from searching data using 5 databases, namely Science
Direct, PuBmed, SAGE, Taylor & Francis Online (Tandfonline), and Google Scholar with a range
of 2013-2020 with a total of 1,031 articles. There were 9 articles that met the criteria that were
assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. The results of the review of the articles that had
been carried out were that music therapy was given by various methods such as improvisation,
listening to music, and singing. The types of music provided were murrotal Al-Qur'an, classical
music, and instrumental music. The conclusion from the review of this article was that the method
could be given was an improvised method with a30 minutes minimum duration and a 60 minutes
maximum duration . The types of music that could be provided were murrotal Al-Qur'an and
classical music. Recommendations in this study was to intervene in music therapy with improvised
methods, murrotal Al-Qur'an music and classical music.
243
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
kelainan struktur otak atau fungsi otak memiliki kecenderungan terhadap stimulus
(Daulay, 2017). Anak laki-laki memiliki suara yang dikeluarkan oleh musik meskipun
peluang empat kali lebih besar untuk anak autisme memiliki gangguan pada sistem
mengalami gangguan autisme dibanding saraf (Bharathi et al., 2019; LaGasse, A.,
dengan anak perempuan (Astuti et al., 2017). 2014). Musik yang didengarkan dapat
memberikan suasana yang menyenangkan
Berdasarkan data yang dikumpulkan World serta dapat mempengaruhi proses kognitif
Health Organization (WHO), 1 dari 160 (Sumartini et al., 2020).
anak didiagnosa memiliki gangguan
autisme (Subiantoro, 2018). Prevalensi Menurut Anam et al. (2019), pada anak
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) di autisme apabila diberikan terapi musik dapat
seluruh dunia terus mengalami peningkatan memperbaiki dan mengubah perilaku,
dari tahun ke tahun, dilaporkan prevalensi pandangan mata, perhatian bersama,
autisme di seluruh dunia berjumlah 1-3% mengembangkan kesadaran tubuh,
(Bharathi et al., 2019). Tahun 2016 Pusat komunikasi, serta dapat menurunkan
Kesehatan Nasional untuk statistik kecemasan, emosional, dan hiperaktivitas.
kesehatan merilis angka prevalensi terbaru Berdasarkan uraian di atas, peneliti tertarik
dan melaporkan rekor tinggi baru dengan untuk mendeskripsikan systematic review
mengutip autism spectrum disorder (ASD) penelitian terbaru tentang intervensi terapi
dari 36 anak dapat ditemukan 1 didiagnosis musik terhadap kemampuan interaksi sosial
autisme (Zablotsky et al., 2017). pada anak autisme. Jika kemampuan
berinteraksi anak autisme tidak terus dilatih,
Memperbaiki keadaan anak dengan autisme maka kemungkinan besar anak autisme
dapat diusahakan dengan melakukan tersebut akan jatuh ke rentang respon yang
beberapa intervensi di antaranya adalah paling maladaptif yaitu paranoid (Will et al.,
terapi perilaku Applied Behaviour Analysis 2018). Untuk itu, penelitian ini bermaksud
(ABA), pemberian obat, terapi akupuntur, melakukan evaluasi terhadap
terapi musik, terapi balur, terapi diet penatalaksanaan anak autisme secara
(Rinakri, 2018; Fueyo et al., 2015). Terapi nonfarmakologi yaitu, dengan pemberian
musik adalah salah satu terapi alternatif yang terapi musik yang selama ini pernah
digunakan dalam upaya preventif dan dilakukan dan seberapa besar intervensi
promotif (Astuti et al., 2017). Terapi musik tersebut memberikan kontribusi terhadap
merupakan salah satu terapi komplementer penanganan anak autisme dalam mengatasi
yang dapat meningkatkan kemampuan masalah interaksi sosial, yang pada akhirnya
interaksi sosial anak autisme. Terapi musik diharapkan dapat dihasilkan suatu
termasuk terapi yang efektif dan tidak rekomendasi penatalaksanaan yang dapat
mengancam serta dapat memperbaiki atau lebih bisa dipertahankan.
menghilangkan kesulitan hidup secara fisik,
psikis, sosial, distres spiritual dan METODE
meningkatkan kenyamanan (Eren, 2015). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian
ini adalah metode systematic review yaitu
Menurut Idayanti & Sartika (2016), musik metode yang digunakan untuk
merupakan media yang mudah digunakan mengidentifikasi, mengevaluasi, dan
dibandingkan dengan media lainnya dan juga menafsirkan semua penelitian yang
memberikan rasa aman karena musik tidak tersedia dengan bidang topik fenomena
menimbulkan efek samping dan membantu yang menarik, dengan pertanyaan
mengurangi kecemasan dalam berinteraksi penelitian tertentu yang relevan. Dengan
langsung dengan orang lain (Subiantoro, penggunaan metode systematic review
2018; Maria et al., 2014). Anak autisme dapat dilakukan review dan identifikasi
244
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
jurnal secara sistematis yang pada setiap menggunakan PICOT template yang terdiri
prosesnya mengikuti langkah-langkah dari: (a) Population/Problem yaitu anak
atau protokol yang telah ditetapkan autisme usia 3-18 tahun dengan masalah
(Triandini et al., 2019). Pada penelitian interaksi sosial; (b) Intervention yaitu
ini peneliti menelaah artikel tentang perlakuan yang sedang dipertimbangkan
intervensi terapi musik dalam dalam studi sesuai dengan tema terapi
meningkatkan kemampuan interaksi sosial musik; (c) Comparison yaitu intervensi lain
pada anak autisme. yang digunakan sebagai pembanding; (d)
Outcome adalah hasil yang diperoleh dari
Pencarian artikel pada 5 database studi sebelumnya yang sesuai dengan tema
menggunakan kata kunci (“music therapy” yang sudah ditentukan; (e) type of studies
or “audio therapy”) and (“autism” or adalah desain penelitian yang digunakan
“autistic” or “autism spectrum disorder”) dalam artikel yang direview yaitu quasy
and (“children”) and (“social skills” or experimental dan randomized controlled
“social interaction”). Strategi yang trials (RCT).
digunakan untuk mencari artikel
Jumlah artikel yang diidentifikasi melalui pencarian data pada 5 database Jumlah duplicate dihapus (n = 105)
(n = 1.031)
Skema 1. Diagram Alir PRISMA Pencarian Literatur Intervensi Terapi Musik terhadap
Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial pada Anak Autisme
Tabel 1.
Analisis artikel
Lama
Penulis, tahun, Metode dan Jenis
No. Study Design Partisipan penelitian dan Outcome
dan negara Musik
instrumen
1. Bharathi et al. Quasi 52 anak 1 minggu Improvisasi Intervensi terapi
(2019) India Experimental Lembar Instrumental, musik
observasi klasik, dan menunjukkan
murrotal Al- peningkatan
245
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
Lama
Penulis, tahun, Metode dan Jenis
No. Study Design Partisipan penelitian dan Outcome
dan negara Musik
instrumen
Qur’an kemampuan
keterampilan
sosial pada anak
autisme
2. Astuti et al. Quasi 30 anak 2 minggu Mendengarkan Terdapat
(2017) Experimental Lembar musik perbedaan yang
Indonesia observasi Murrotal Al- signifikan pada
Qur’an perkembangan
perilaku
3. Ghasemtabar Quasi 27 anak 45 hari Improvisasi Intervensi terapi
et al. (2020) Experimental Lembar Musik instrumental musik
Iran observasi berpengaruh
terhadap
keterampilan
sosial pada anak
autisme
4. Khanzadeh & Quasi 30 anak 7 minggu Improvisasi Intervensi terapi
Imankhah Experimental Lembar Musik instrumental musik
(2017) Iran observasi meningkatkan
prososial anak
autisme
5. Sharda et al. Randomized 51 anak 8-12 minggu Improvisasi Intervesni terapi
(2018) Kanada Controlled Lembar Musik instrumental musik
Trial observasi memberikan
peningkatan pada
keterampilan
sosial anak autism
246
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
Lama
Penulis, tahun, Metode dan Jenis
No. Study Design Partisipan penelitian dan Outcome
dan negara Musik
instrumen
Norwegia Trial observasi memberikan
perubahan dalam
keterampilan
sosial pada anak
autisme
247
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
248
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
Daulay N-. (2017). Struktur Otak dan Kriswanto YJ. (2020). Peran Musik
Keberfungsiannya pada Anak Sebagai Media Intervensi Dalam
dengan Gangguan Spektrum Autis: Lingkup Praktik Klinis. J Seni dan
Kajian Neuropsikologi. Bul Psikol. Desain ;2(3):81–6
25(1):11–25.
https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsik LaGasse AB. (2015). Effects of a music
ologi.25163 therapy group intervention on
enhancing social skills in children
Eren B. (2015). The Use of Music with autism. J Music Ther
Interventions to Improve Social ;51(3):250–75
Skills in Adolescents with Autism
Spectrum Disorders in Integrated LaGasse B. (2017). Social outcomes in
Group Music Therapy Sessions. children with autism spectrum
Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. disorder: a review of music therapy
197(February):207–13. Tersedia outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome
pada: Meas; Volume 8:23–32
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.20
15.07.125 Maria, S., Fitryasari, R., & Endang, H.
(2014). Pengaruh Terapi Musik
Fueyo M, Caldwell T, Mattern SB, Zahid Mozart Terhadap Penurunan
J, Foley T. (2015). The health home: Perilaku Tantrum Pada Anak
A service delivery model for autism Autisme Di Sekolah Autis Harapan
and intellectual disability. Psychiatr Bunda Surabaya ;2(1)
Serv. 2015;66(11):1135–7
Mössler, K., Gold, C., Aßmus, J.,
Hosseini M, Fayyaz I, Arab S, Naghashian Schumacher, K., Calvet, C., Reimer,
H, Poudineh Z, Ghasemtabar S. S., Iversen, G., & Schmid, W.
(2015). Music therapy: An effective (2017). The Therapeutic
approach in improving social skills Relationship as Predictor of Change
of children with autism. Adv in Music Therapy with Young
Biomed Res; 4(1):157 Children with Autism Spectrum
249
Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa (JKJ): Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia
Volume 9 No 2 Hal 243 - 250, Mei 2021, e-ISSN 2655-8106, p-ISSN2338-2090
FIKKes Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang bekerjasama dengan PPNI Jawa Tengah
250
Zygawindi Nurhidayati | Pengaruh Pola Konsumsi Makanan Bebas Gluten Bebas Casein dengan Gangguan Perilaku pada
Anak Autistik
Zygawindi Nurhidayati
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Lampung
Abstrak
Autistik merupakan suatu gangguan perkembangan pervasif yang mempengaruhi kemampuan dalam interaksi sosial,
komunikasi dan perilaku. Kelainan tersebut terlihat sebelum anak berusia tiga tahun. Anak dengan gangguan autistik
memiliki gangguan perilaku yang disebut perilaku autis. Gangguan perilaku pada anak autistik tersebut dipengaruhi oleh
berbagai faktor. Salah satu faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi gangguan perilaku pada anak autistik adalah makanan
terutama makanan yang mengandung gluten dan kasein. Hal tersebut terjadi karena kedua jenis protein tersebut sulit
dicerna oleh tubuh. Pada membran saluran cerna anak dengan autistik ditemukan kelainan berupa adanya pori-pori yang
tidak normal dan hiperpermeabilitas mukosa usus. Gluten dan kasein pada anak autistik hanya terpecah sampai
polipeptida. Polipeptida tersebut kemudian terserap ke dalam aliran darah dan beredar dalam bentuk gluteo dan
caseomorphin. Gluteo dan caseomorphin tersebut kemudian terikat pada reseptor opiod di otak. Reseptor tersebut
mempengaruhi mood dan perilaku sehingga terikatnya kedua zat tersebut dapat mempengaruhi gangguan perilaku pada
anak autistik. Oleh karena itu, salah satu cara untuk mengurangi gangguan perilaku pada anak autistik, yaitu dengan cara
menghindari makanan yang mengandung gluten dan casein.
The Influence of Gluten Free Casein Free Foods Consumption with Behavior
Disorders in Autistic Children
Abstract
Autistic is a pervasive developmental disorder that influences the ability of social interaction, communication and behavior.
It can be seenat the children under three years. The abnormality seen before three years of age. Children with autistic
disorder get behavioral disorders called autism behavior. Behavior disorders in autistic children is influenced by various
factors. One of the factors that can influence behavioral disorders is food, especially food that contain gluten and casein. It
happens because of two types of protein are difficult to digest. In autistic children gastrointestinal tract membrane was
found pores abnormal and hiperpermeability intestinal mucosa. Gluten and casein can be rended only up to polypeptide in
children with autistic disorder. Then, the polypeptide absorbed in to the bloodstream and circulate in the form of gluteo
and caseomorphin. Gluteo and caseomorphin bound to the opoid receptor in the brain. The receptor can influence mood
and behavior, so both of these substances can affect behavioral disorders in autistic children. Therefore, one of the way to
reduce behavioral disorders on autistic children is by avoiding foods that contain gluten and casein.
Korespondensi : Zygawindi Nurhidayati, alamat KP. Cakung No. 101 Rt 004/002 Jatikramat, Jatiasih, Bekasi, HP
082186062369, e-mail zyganurhidayati@gmail.com
per tahunnya bertambah sekitar 6.900 anak disfungsi metabolik, gangguan perkembangan
per tahun.4 Berdasarkan jenis kelaminnya, saat postnatal dan prenatal dan faktor
penderita autis empat kali lebih banyak lingkungan.2 Sampai saat ini masih belum
diderita oleh laki-laki daripada perempuan. dapat dipastikan penyebab dari autisme, tetapi
Dengan kata lain, anak laki-laki lebih rentan terdapat sejumlah teori yang mendukung
terkena autis dibandingkan anak perempuan.2 terkait penyebab autisme, antara lain sebagai
Anak autis memiliki gangguan perilaku berikut :
khas yang disebut perilaku autis. Pada sebagian a. Genetik
besar anak autis sering memperlihatkan Gangguan autistik diperkirakan sekitarr
perilaku seperti hiperaktif, menyakiti diri 90%, dicurigai adanya abnormalitas
sendiri, suka bertepuk tangan berulang genetik pada kromosom 7, 2 dan 15.9
ulang,suka mengamuk, tidak mampu dalam Hasil penelitian pada keluarga dan anak
menatap lawan bicara.2 Perilaku-perilaku kembar menunjukkan adanya faktor
tersebut disebabkan oleh berbagai faktor genetik yang berperan dalam
seperti umur, intelegensia, pola asuh orang perkembangan autisme.10
tua, intensitas terapi, pola konsumsi pangan b. Faktor perinatal
dan lain sebagainya.5 Komplikasi perinatal yang cukup tinggi
Pola konsumsi makanan merupakan ditemukan pada anak-anak dengan
salah satu faktor yang harus diperhatikan bagi gangguan autistik, walaupun tidak ada
anak dengan autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) komplikasi yang secara langsung
karena terdapat makanan-makanan tertentu dinyatakan sebagai penyebab.
yang menjadi pantangan. Hal tersebut juga Komplikasi yang sering dilaporkan adalah
terkait dengan salah satu terapi diet bagi adanya perdarahan di trisemester
penderita ASD berupa diet gluten free casein pertama dan adanya mekonium dalam
free (GFCF). Diet tersebut diterapkan karena cairan amnion lebih sering ditemukan
makanan yang mengandung gluten dan kasein pada anak dengan gangguan autistik.11
seperti gandum dapat meningkatkan c. Neuroanatomi
hiperpermeabilitas usus yang mengakibatkan Berbagai kondisi neuropatologi diduga
gluten dan kasein tidak tercerna dengan baik dapat mendorong timbulnnya gangguan
dan ada yang mengalir ke aliran darah dan otak perilaku pada anak-anak autistik, ada
sehingga mempengaruhi perilaku dari anak beberapa daerah di otak anak autistik
autis tersebut.6 yang diduga mengalami disfungsi.10
Lobus temporalis telah diperkirakan
Isi sebagai bagian penting dalam otak yang
Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) adalah mungkin abnormal pada gangguan
gangguan perkembangan pervasif yang autistik. Hal tersebut berdasarkan
ditandai dengan ketidakmampuan dalam laporan adanya sindroma yang mirip
berinteraksi sosial, berkomunikasi, dan gangguan autistik pada orang dengan
berperilaku sesuai dengan perkembangan, kerusakan lobus temporalis. Jika daerah
ketertarikan dan aktifitas. Kelainan tersebut temporalis rusak, perilaku sosial yang
terlihat sebelum anak berusia 3 tahun.2 diharapkan menghilang, dan
Menurut Atchison dalam Marpaung (2014) kegelisahan, perilaku motorik berulang,
istilah Pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) dan kumpulan perilaku terbatas
menjadi Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) ditemukan.11 Pada otak kecil juga
berubah sejak dilakukannya revisi terhadap ditemukan kelainan, terutama pada
Diagnostic and statistical Manual Of Mental lobus ke VI dan VII. Jumlah sel purkinje di
(DSM) Disorder IV TR menjadi Diagnostic and otak kecil juga didapatkan sangat sedikit,
statistical Manual Of Mental (DSM) Disorder sehingga terjadi gangguan keseimbangan
V.7,8 serotonin dan dopamin, menyebabkan
Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) gangguan impuls di otak. Ditemukan
merupakan kelainan neurodevelopmental yang pula kelainan khas didaerah sistem
belum dapat dipastikan penyebabnya. Berbagai limbik yang disebut hipokamus dan
teori tentang autisme banyak dikemukakan amigdala. Akibatnya terjadi gangguan
diantaranya berkaitan dengan faktor genetik, fungsi kontrol terhadap agresi dan
mempunyai sifat khas yaitu dapat menggumpal linguistik pada kelompok dengan pemberian
dan membentuk massa yang kompak.4 diet gluten free casein free tetapi tidak ada
Pada orang normal gluten dan casein perbaikan dalam keterampilan kognitif atau
akan dicerna secara sempurna oleh proses motorik.17
kimiawi dan fisik menjadi asam amino tunggal Berdasarkan penelitian tahun 2012 di
dan diserap oleh usus. Sedangkan pada anak Bandung, didapatkan bahwa sebanyak 85%
autis proses pencernaan gluten dan casein orang tua yang tidak patuh dalam menerapkan
berlangsung secara tidak sempurna.15 diet GFCF berdampak pada terjadinya
Pada kebanyakan pasien autis gangguan perilaku anak mereka dibandingkan
ditemukan adanya pori-pori yang tidak lazim pada anak autis yang orang tuanya patuh
pada membran saluran cerna dan menjalankan diet. Hal tersebut terjadi karena
hiperpermeabilitas mukosa usus. Gluten dan tidak semua makanan yang mengandung
kasein pada anak dengan gangguan autistik, gluten dan kasein dapat dengan mudah
hanya terpecah sampai polipeptida. dihilangkan dari menu makanan anak.
Hiperpermebilitas pada mukosa usus Ketidakpatuhan tersebut akan menyebabkan
menyebabkan peptide ini meningkat. gangguan perilaku anak autis seperti
Polipeptida dari kedua protein tersebut tidak mengamuk. Anak autis yang menjalani diet
tercerna keluar dari dinding usus tetapi GFCF secara patuh memiliki emosi yang lebih
terserap ke dalam aliran darah dan beredar stabil dan lebih tenang.18
dalam bentuk gluteo dan caseomorphin dan Penelitian terhadap anak autis yang
kemudian terikat pada reseptor opioid diotak. dilakukan di Pusat Terapi Pendidikan Ananda
Reseptor tersebut berhubungan dengan mood Bekasi tahun 2013 menunjukan bahwa
dan tingkah laku, sehingga menimbulkan gejala terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara
kelainan perilaku pada anak autistik. Selain itu, frekuensi diet bebas gluten bebas kasein
adanya gangguan enzim Dipeptidylpeptidase IV dengan skor perilaku autis. Pada penelitian
pada anak autis mengakibatkan gluten tersebut, penderita autis yang mengkonsumsi
dankasein tidak tercerna dengan makanan sumber gluten dan kasein dengan
sempurna.6,12,15 frekuensi yang rendah memiliki perilaku yang
Dari penelitian Whiteley, Rodgers, lebih terarah daripada penderita autis yang
Savery dan Shattock (1999), 22 anak autis mengkonsumsi makanan sumber gluten dan
mendapat diet bebas gluten selama 5 bulan kasein dengan frekuensi tinggi.14
dibandingkan dengan 5 anak autis yang tetap Penelitian di Kota Depok tahun 2013
diberi diet mengandung gluten dan 6 pasien terhadap 35 anak ASD dengan rentang usia 3-7
autis yang digunakan sebagai kelompok tahun terkait hubungan praktik pengaturan
kontrol. Setelah 3 bulan, pada diet bebas diet dengan perilaku emosional anak dengan
gluten terjadi perbaikan verbal dan komunikasi ASD, didapatkan nilai signifikan p-value 0,001.
non verbal, pendekatan afektif, motorik, dan hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa praktik
kemampuan anak untuk perhatian serta tidur pengaturan diet yang dilakukan memiliki
jadi lebih baik. Sedangkan pada kelompok hubungan dengan perilaku emosional pada
makanan yang masih mengandung gluten anak ASD dengan rentang usia 3-7 tahun. Diet
justru semuanya memburuk. Meskipun yang diterapkan pada penelitian tersebut tidak
penelitian ini masih menggunakan jumlah hanya diet bebas gluten bebas kasein tetapi
pasien yang sangat kecil, tetapi cukup bisa beberapa diet yang lain seperti diet bebas gula
diterima sampai sekarang.12 murni, diet bebas jamur .19
Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan Pada penelitian terhadap 70 anak-anak
di Bogor tahun 2004 diperoleh hasil bahwa autis berumur 1-8 tahun yang mendapat diet
sebanyak 68,24% anak autis menunjukkan gluten free casein free ditemukan bahwa 81%
adanya perbaikan perilaku pada tingkat diantaranya mengalami perubahan perilaku
hiperaktivitas setelah dilakukan terapi diet.16 yang signifikan dalam 3 bulan yaitu berupa
Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan perubahan dari isolasi sosial, kontak mata,
Knivsberg et al. selama 12 bulan dengan dua mutisme, hiperaktif, aktivitas stereotipik dan
puluh peserta yang dipasangkan kemudian serangan panik. Perubahan tersebut terus
diacak ke dalam suatu kelompok, didapatkan mengalami perbaikan selama 12 bulan.
perbaikan perilaku autisme dan kemampuan Kemudian pada 19 % yang tidak mengalami
Abstrak
Autisme merupakan gangguan perkembangan pervasif yang dapat menimbulkan tekanan yang berat
bagi orangtua. Jika orangtua tidak memiliki pengetahuan tentang anak autis, orangtua cenderung
memiliki penerimaan yang rendah terhadap anak. Internet dapat digunakan sebagai salah satu media
literasi yang menyediakan informasi dan pengetahuan yang beragam, mudah, murah, dan cepat.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas intervensi literasi dengan dukungan
internet dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan ibu yang memiliki anak autis. Subjek penelitian adalah 3
orang ibu yang memiliki anak usia 3-8 tahun yang telah didiagnosis autis. Penelitian ini
menggunakan desain metode eksperimen kasus tunggal dengan menerapkan model literasi
kesehatan dengan dukungan internet. Alat ukur yang digunakan untuk mengetahui kondisi
psikologis subjek sebelum dan sesudah intervensi adalah Skala Pengetahuan Autis. Analisis data
dilakukan dengan metode visual inspection dan analisis deskriptif. Nilai mean antara fase baseline
dengan fase intervensi menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pengetahuan subjek. Hasil penelitian ini
menunjukkan bahwa literasi online dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan orangtua yang memiliki anak
dengan autis.
Abstract
Autism is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder which may cause high pressure to parents. The
parents who have no knowledge about autism tend to have low knowledge about their children
condition. Internet can be used as a literacy media to provide the easy, cheap and fast information
for parents. The aim of this research was to know the effectiveness of internet supported literacy
intervention in enhancing parental parental knowledge who have children with autism. Participants
were 3 mothers with autism diagnosed children and children were about 3 to 8 years old. This
research used single-case experiment by applying internet supported health literacy model. The
measurement used Autism Knowledge Scale. The data was analyzed using visual inspection method
and descriptive analysis. Mean score between baseline phase and intervention increased. Results
suggested that online literacy may enhance knowledge of mother who have children with autism.
PENDAHULUAN
Autis menurut istilah ilmiah kedokteran, psikiatri, dan psikologi, termasuk dalam
gangguan perkembangan pervasif (pervasive developmental disorders). Data dari berbagai
media di Indonesia menunjukkan bahwa prevalensi penyandang autisme dibandingkan
dengan jumlah kelahiran normal, dari tahun ke tahun meningkat tajam (Ferry, 2013;
METODE
Kriteria inklusi penelitian yaitu: (1) ibu dari anak berusia 3-8 tahun yang sudah
didiagnosis autis oleh dokter atau psikolog; anak tersebut merupakan anak pertama atau
kedua; (2) usia subjek 25-45 tahun; (3) pendidikan minimal SMA; (4) mampu
mengoperasikan komputer dan internet tanpa bantuan orang lain saat mengakses website,
email, dan facebook; (5) memiliki skor pengetahuan autis rendah hingga sedang.
Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah Skala Pengetahuan Autis (10 item dengan α =
0,743). Instrumen pelengkap penelitian adalah informed consent; buku catatan harian;
lembar observasi sesi intervensi; lembar monitoring website; lembar evaluasi penelitian;
dan panduan wawancara.
Analisis data visual dilakukan pada data catatan harian perilaku ibu terhadap anak
yang diisi oleh subjek selama 39 hari. Data catatan harian ibu berupa checklist perilaku ibu
yang terdiri dari dua bagian item yaitu perilaku positif dan perilaku negatif. Item perilaku
positif yaitu mencium anak, memeluk anak, memuji anak, menemani anak melakukan
kegiatan, dan bermain bersama anak. Item perilaku negatif yaitu menghindari anak,
Data dari catatan harian subjek juga digunakan untuk melakukan analisis visual
terhadap tingkat stabilitas, tingkat kecenderungan arah (slope), dan tingkat perubahan
penerimaan orangtua. Hasil analisis ini digunakan sebagai keterangan tambahan hasil
analisis skala penelitian. Analisis stabilitas variabel menunjukkan tingkat stabilitas perilaku
ketiga subjek pada fase A1 dan fase A2 adalah stabil. Analisis kecenderungan arah (slope)
dengan metode split middle menunjukkan arah dan tingkat perubahan karena pengaruh
intervensi.
Pada Ibu A, saat fase A1 ada penurunan median dari 49 menjadi 47, saat fase B ada
peningkatan median dari 51 menjadi 55, dan saat fase A2 ada peningkatan median dari 49
menjadi 50. Tingkat perubahan Ibu A dari fase A1 ke fase B menunjukkan peningkatan
sebesar 4 poin dengan arah (+) atau membaik. Pada Ibu B, saat fase A1 ada penurunan
median dari 50 menjadi 48, saat fase B ada peningkatan median dari 52 menjadi 56, dan
saat fase A2 ada peningkatan median dari 48 menjadi 51. Tingkat perubahan Ibu B dari
fase A1 ke fase B menunjukkan peningkatan sebesar 3 poin dengan arah (+) atau membaik.
Pada Ibu C, saat fase A1 tidak ada perubahan arah, median tetap sebesar 50, saat fase B
ada peningkatan median dari 53 menjadi 56, dan saat fase A2 ada penurunan median dari
51 menjadi 50. Tingkat perubahan Ibu C dari fase A1 ke fase B menunjukkan peningkatan
sebesar 7 poin dengan arah (+) atau membaik.
KESIMPULAN
Berdasarkan uraian di atas, hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perubahan variabel
dependen yaitu adanya peningkatan pengetahuan orangtua terhadap anak autis. Peneliti
menyadari bahwa penelitian ini memiliki keterbatasan. Salah satu keterbatasan adalah
penggunaan internet yang belum maksimal karena keterbatasan kemampuan subjek dalam
mengakses website, facebook, dan menggunakan laptop. Keterbatasan tersebut
menyebabkan internet hanya digunakan dalam penyajian materi literasi tetapi kurang dapat
dimanfaatkan untuk menulis catatan harian dan menyelesaikan tugas harian. Keterbatasan
berkaitan kriteria inklusi subjek adalah kesetaraan tingkat pengetahuan dan kemampuan
subjek dalam mengakses website dan menggunakan komputer/laptop tidak diukur.
Keterbatasan berkaitan bentuk intervensi adalah adanya kegiatan menulis. Pada subjek
yang tidak terbiasa menulis mengalami kesulitan menuliskan apa yang dipikirkan atau
dirasakan.
Keterbatasan tersebut dapat diatasi oleh peneliti lain dengan lebih cermat memilih
subjek penelitian, melakukan modifikasi buku catatan harian untuk self-monitoring,
menyusun artikel literasi dengan bahasa yang singkat, jelas, dan mudah dipahami
dilengkapi gambar dan video yang sesuai, serta mengoptimalkan internet sebagai media
intervensi. Kemajuan teknologi informasi saat ini memberikan peluang yang sangat besar
bagi pengembangan intervensi psikologi berbasis internet, baik untuk layanan psikoedukasi,
konsultasi maupun terapi psikologi. Oleh karena itu peneliti berharap pada para akademisi,
praktisi, sekolah, masyarakat, maupun pemerintah untuk mulai menggunakan teknologi
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Arsli, A. O. (2006). Penerimaan orangtua yang memiliki anak Autis. Skripsi. Tidak
Dipublikasikan. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Baran, S. J. (2004). Introduction to mass communication: Media literacy & culture. Boston:
McGraw Hill.
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs. Strategies for
studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.
Bernhardt, J. M., & Felter, E. M. (2004). Online pediatric information seeking among
mothers of young children: Results from a qualitative study using focus groups.
Journal of Medical Internet Research , 6(1), e7.
Berrss, K., Johnson, C., Handen, B., Smith, T., & Scahill, L. (2012). A pilot study of parent
training in young children with autism spectrum disorders and disruptive behavior.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 43(4), 829-840, DOI
10.1007/s10803-012-1624-7.
Bisono, T. (2005). Anak autis luncurkan buku autistic journey. Dipetik dari
http://www.kompas.com/kesehatan/news/0504/13/085339.htm
Brookman-Frazee, L., Stahmer, A., Baker-Ericzen, M. J., & Tsai, K. (2006). Parenting
interventions for children with autism spectrum and disruptive behavior disorder:
Opportunities for cross-fertilization. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review,
9(3/4), 181-200.
Cline, R., & Haynes, K. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the internet: The
state of the art. Health Educational Research , 16(6), 671-692.
Cook, R. S., Rule, S., & Mariger, H. (2003). Parents’ evaluation of the usability of a website
on recommended practices . Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(1),
19-27.
Erguner-Tekinalp, B., & Akkok, F. (2004). The effects of a coping skills training program
on the coping skills, hopelessness, and stress levels of mothers of children with
autism. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling , 26(3), 257-269.
Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. San
Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gray, D. (2006). Coping over time: The parents of children with autism. Journal of
Intellectual Diasbility Research. 50(12), 970-976, Doi: 10.0000/j.1365-
2788.2006.0093.x.
Green, J., Charman, T., McConachi, H., Aldred, C., Slonims, V., Howlin, P., et al. (2010).
Parent mediated communication focused treatment in children with autism (PACT):
A randomized controlled trial. The Lancet, 375(9732), 2152-2160.
Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the house: The internet as a source of lay health knowledge
and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness Journal, 21(6), 820-
835.
Hjelie, I., & Ziegler, D. (1981). Personality theories, basic assumptions, research and
applications. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
Hussain, S., & Munaf, S. (2012). Perceived father acceptance-rejection in childhood and
psychological. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 149-156.
Johnson, R., & Medinus, G. (1974). Child psychology. Behavior and development. (3rd ed).
New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. Methods for clinical and applied
settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kidd, M., Terry, T., & Kengwee, J. (2010). Adult learning in the digital age: Perspective
on online technologies and outcomes. New York: IGI Global.
Kidd, T., & Jared, K. (2010). Adult learning in the digital age: Perspectives on online
technologies and outcomes. New York: IGI Global.
Lestari, S. (1995). Hubungan antara persepsi mengenai penerimaan orangtua dan harga
diri pada remaja penyandang tuna netra. Skripsi (Tidak dipublikasikan).
Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Literacy, R. o., Practic, B. o., & Medicine, I. o. (2012). Facilitating state health exchange
communication through the use of health literate practices: Workshop summary.
National Academies Press, p.1.
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the deppression anxiety stress
Scales. (2nd Ed). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.
Maliken, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (2013). Exploring the impact of parental psychopathology
and emotion regulation on evidence-based parenting interventions: A transdiagnostic
approach to improving treatment effectiveness. Clinical Children and Family
Psychological, 16(2), 173-186, DOI: 10.1007/s0567-013-0132-4.
Martland, N. E. (2001). Expert criteria for evaluating the quality of web-based child
development information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Boston: Tufts
University.
McWilliams, R. A., & Scott, S. (2001). A support approach to early intervention: A three-
part framework. Journal of Infants and Young Children, 13(4), 55-66.
Monks, F., & Knoers, A. (2002). Psikologi perkembangan. Pengantar dalam berbagai
bagiannya. Terjemahan: Siti Rahayu Haditono. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
University Press.
Nky. (2013, April 9). Anak penderita autis ada di sekeliling kita. Dipetik dari
http://jaringnews.com/hidup-sehat/umum/38230/anak-penderita-autis-ada-di-
sekeliling-kita.
Ogretir, A., & Ulutas, I. (2009). The study of the effects of the mother support education
program on the parental acceptance and rejection levels of the turkish mothers.
Humanity and Social Science Journal, 4(1), 12-19.
Oliver, L. E., & Whiffen, V. E. (2003). Perceptions of parents and partners and men’s
depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Realationships, 20(5), 621-
635.
Oosterling, I., & dkk. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of the focus parent training for
toddlers with autism: 1-Year outcome. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorder, 40(12), 1447-1458, DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1004-0.
Pallen, M. (1995). Guide to the internet: The world wide. British Medical Journal,
311(7019), 1552-1556.
Reber, A. S., & Reber, E. S. (2010). Kamus psikologi (Terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B. P., & Gonder-Frederick, L.
A. (2009). A behavior change model for internet intervention. The Society of
Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 18-27.
Rohner, R. P., Bourque, S. L., & Elordi, C. A. (1996). Children's perceptions of corporal
punishment, caretaker acceptance, and psychological adjustment ina poor, biracial
southern community. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(4), 842-852.
Safaria, T. (2005). Autisme: Pemahaman baru untuk hidup bermakna bagi orangtua.
Yogyakarta: Grha Ilmu.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbel, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-
experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Company.
Skinner, H., Biscope, S., & Poland, B. (2003). Quality of internet access: Barriers behind
internet use. Journal of Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 875-880.
Smith, C. A. (1999). Family life pathfinders on the new electronic frontier. Journal of
Family Relations, 48(1), 31-34.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Positive psychology. The scientific and practical
explorations of human strenght. California: Sage Publications.
Sofronoff, K., & Farbotko, M. (2002). The effectiveness of parent management training to
increase self-efficacy in parents of children with asperger syndrome. Autism, 6(3),
271-286, DOI 10.1177/1362361302006003005.
Sofronoff, K., Leslie, A., & Brown, W. (2004). Parent management training and asperger
syndrome: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a parent based intervention.
Autism, 8(3), 301-317, DOI: 10.1177/1362361304045215.
Spek, & Viola. (2007). Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of
depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37(3),
319–328.
Stellefson, M., Hanik, B., Chaney, B., Tennant, B., & Chavarria, E. A. (2011). eHealth
literacy among college students: A systematic review with implications for eHealth
education. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e102, doi: 10.216/jmir.1703.
Sunanto, J., Takeuchi, K., & Nakata, H. (2005). Pengantar penelitian dengan subjek
tunggal. (Hasil Penelitian Tidak Diterbitkan). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia.
Sundel, M., & Sundel, S. S. (2005). Behavior change in the human services. California:
Sage Publications.
Taylor, M. R., Alman, A., & Manchester, D. K. (2001). Use of the internet by patients and
their families. Journal of Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76(8), 772-776.
Vismara, L., McCormick, C., Young, G. S., Nadhan, A., & Monlux, K. (2013). Preliminary
findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. Journal Autism and
Development Disorder, 43(12), 2953-2969, DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1841-8.
Zaidman-Zait, A., & Jamieson, J. R. (2007). Providing web-based support for families of
infants and young children with Established disabilities. Journal of Infants & Young
Children, 20(1), 11-25.
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Rogers, T., & Roberts. (2005). Behavioral manifestations of
autism in the first year of life. International Journal of Development Neuroscience,
23(2-3), 143-152.
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Aim: To quantitatively examine the influence of study methodology and population characteristics on
prevalence estimates of autism spectrum disorders.
Methods: Electronic databases and bibliographies were searched and identified papers evaluated against
See end of article for inclusion criteria. Two groups of studies estimated the prevalence of typical autism and all autism spectrum
authors’ affiliations disorders (ASD). The extent of variation among studies and overall prevalence were estimated using meta-
.......................
analysis. The influence of methodological factors and population characteristics on estimated prevalence
Correspondence to: was investigated using meta-regression and summarised as odds ratios (OR).
Dr J G Williams, Results: Forty studies met inclusion criteria, of which 37 estimated the prevalence of typical autism, and 23
Department of Public
Health and Primary Care, the prevalence of all ASD. A high degree of heterogeneity among studies was observed. The overall
University of Cambridge, random effects estimate of prevalence across studies of typical autism was 7.1 per 10 000 (95% CI 1.6 to
Forvie Site, Robinson 30.6) and of all ASD was 20.0 per 10 000 (95% CI 4.9 to 82.1). Diagnostic criteria used (ICD-10 or
Way, Cambridge CB2
2SR, UK; j.g.williams.97@ DSM-IV versus other; OR = 3.36, 95% CI 2.07 to 5.46), age of the children screened (OR = 0.91 per year,
cantab.net 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), and study location (e.g. Japan versus North America; OR = 3.60, 95% CI 1.73 to
7.46) were all significantly associated with prevalence of typical autism. Diagnostic criteria, age of the
Accepted sample, and urban or rural location were associated with estimated prevalence of all ASD.
22 December 2004
Published Online First
Conclusions: Sixty one per cent of the variation in prevalence estimates of typical autism was explained by
29 April 2005 these models. Diagnostic criteria used, age of children screened, and study location may be acting as
....................... proxies for other study characteristics and require further investigation.
copyright.
T
he prevalence of autistic disorder is now considered to be Study selection
around 10 per 10 000, and the prevalence of pervasive Identified papers were examined against criteria for inclusion
developmental disorders, 27.5 per 10 000. These are (box 2). The paper itself was examined if the abstract was
derived from studies which have estimated prevalences of
autistic disorder ranging from 0.7 to 72.6 per 10 000.1 An
increase in prevalence estimates has been observed over time, Box 1: Search strategy for identifying
the reasons for which are not clear and may include: changes prevalence studies
in study methodology; a genuine rise in autism risk factors;
increase in services available, including diagnostic; increased MEDLINE (PubMed) (searched 13/04/04)
awareness among educational and clinical professionals; and Years (1966–2004):
growing acceptance that autism can coexist with a range of (‘‘Autistic-Disorder’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR
other conditions.1–4 ‘‘Asperger-Syndrome’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR
True variation in prevalence could generate aetiological ‘‘Schizophrenia-Childhood’’/all subheadings [MeSH] and
hypotheses for autism and it is vital to understand what (PY = 1966–1970) OR autis* (free text term)) AND
underpins the variation. Accurate estimates of the true (‘‘Prevalence-‘‘/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Cross-
prevalence are of value in planning diagnostic and interven- Sectional-Studies’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Mass-
tion services. Screening’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Multiphasic-
Several narrative reviews have been conducted. This paper Screening’’/all subheadings [MeSH]).
uses systematic and quantitative methods to examine reasons
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) (searched 13/04/04)
for variation in prevalence estimates. The aims are to assess
(BIDS EMBASE, via Ovid, copyright 2003)
the degree of variation among prevalence studies of autism,
Years (1980–2004):
and to provide an overall summary of prevalence diversity
(exp` autism/ OR exp infantile autism/ OR exp Asperger
taking into account among-study variance using meta-
syndrome/ OR autism.mp1 (as keyword) OR Asperger.mp
analysis. Aspects of study methodology and population
(as keyword)) AND (exp prevalence/ OR exp mass screen-
characteristics are then examined using meta-regression to
ing/ OR exp screening/ OR cross-sectional.mp (as key-
investigate their influence on prevalence estimates. word)) NOT (genetic screening/exp OR genetic screen.mp
(as keyword).
METHODS
Literature searches MeSH (Medical Subjects Headings), The National Library of
Two databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were systematically Medicine controlled vocabulary for indexing articles in
searched by the first author (box 1). In addition, bibliogra- PubMed; `exp, explode term (search under all subheadings);
phies of previous reviews1 5 6 were examined to identify 1mp, uses the database thesaurus search term.
published prevalence studies.
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 9
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
insufficiently clear. Where there was more than one paper for the true prevalence was calculated as the mean of
published on a particular study, the most recent was included logits ¡ 1.96 t, where t is the among-study standard
in the review. deviation.11
copyright.
examined the null hypothesis that the true prevalences are the basis of 7. In addition, four papers did not have detailed
identical in every study. Since heterogeneity was expected a English summaries, one was not peer reviewed, and two were
priori, this was supplemented with a measure of the degree of untraceable. Of these seven potentially eligible studies, four
inconsistency across studies, I2.9 I2 describes the proportion of were conducted in Japan, one in the USA, one in France, and
variation in prevalence estimates that is due to genuine one in Sweden.
variation in prevalences rather than sampling error. It is Forty papers met inclusion criteria, of which 37 gave
expressed as a percentage, with 0% indicating consistency. estimates for typical autism and 23 for all ASD (table 1). The
The random effects model assumes the study prevalences study sample sizes ranged from 826 to 4 590 333 (med-
follow a normal distribution, allowing for among-study ian = 48 705). Only 17 (40%) studies reported the refusal rate
variation.10 The usual confidence interval for the mean in at the screen phase of the study, and 13 (33%) at the
the random effects model does not take among-study assessment stage. Six (15%) studies reported investigating
variance into account, so is deceptively narrow when there the reliability of their screen method, and 11 (26%) studies
is substantial variation across studies. Instead, a 95% interval stated that the inter-rater reliability for the diagnostic
assessment had been investigated. Many studies did not
report refusal rates and reliability, so these covariates could
Box 2: Inclusion criteria not be included in further analyses.
www.archdischild.com
10
Prospective(P)/ Prevalence
Publ. Sample Screen retrospective (R) Diagnostic estimate (per Diagnostic Prevalence estimate
Ref. year First author Country Sample size Area Age (years) screened1 methods assessment criteria used 10 000) (SE) criteria used (per 10 000) (SE)
www.archdischild.com
14 1966 Lotter UK 78 000 Urban 8–10 P Q P Kanner 4.5 (0.76) – –
15 1970 Treffert USA 899 750 Mixed 0–12 C R R Kanner 0.7 (0.09) – –
16 1970 Brask Denmark 46 500 Urban 2–14 S – – Kanner 4.3 (0.96) – –
17 1979 Wing UK 35 000 Urban 0–15 C R P Kanner 4.9 (1.18) Triad 21.2 (2.46)
18 1982 Hoshino Japan 609 848 Mixed 0–18 P L P Kanner 2.33 (0.20) – –
19 1983 Ishii Japan 34 987 Urban 6–12 P L P Rutter 16.0 (2.14) – –
20 1983 Bohman Sweden 69 000 Mixed 0–20 P L P Rutter 3.0 (0.66) Rutter 5.6 (0.9)
21 1984 McCarthy Ireland 65 000 Mixed 8–10 S R R Kanner 4.3 (0.81) – –
22 1984 Gillberg Sweden 128 584 Mixed 4–18 P L P Rutter 2.0 (0.39) Rutter 3.9 (0.55)
23 1986 Steinhausen Germany 279 616 Urban 0–15 S L R Rutter 1.9 (0.26) – –
24 1986 Steffenburg Sweden 42 886 Mixed 0–9 P L P DSM-III 4.7 (1.05) DSM-III 6.9 (1.27)
25 1987 Burd USA 180 986 Mixed 2–18 C L P DSM-III 1.2 (0.26) DSM-III 3.3 (0.43)
26 1987 Matsuishi Japan 32 834 Urban 4–12 P R P DSM-III 15.5 (2.17) – –
27 1988 Tanoue Japan 95 394 Rural 7 P C P DSM-III 13.8 (1.20) – –
28 1988 Bryson Canada 20 800 Mixed 6–14 P Q P DSM-III 1.9 (0.96) Denkla Triad 10.1 (2.2)
29 1989 Ritvo USA 526 514 Mixed 3–17 P L P DSM-III 2.92 (0.24) – –
30 1989 Sugiyama Japan 11 320 Urban 1.5 P C P DSM-III 13.0 (3.37) – –
31 1989 Cialdella France 135 180 Urban 5–9 C L R DSM-III 5.1 (0.61) DSM-III 10.8 (0.89)
32 1991 Gillberg Sweden 78 102 Mixed 4–13 C L P DSM-III-R 7.0 (0.95) DSM-III-R 9.4 (1.1)
33 1992 Ohtaki Japan 35 366 Mixed 6–14 S R P DSM-III-R 13.9 (1.98) – –
34 1992 Fombonne France 274 816 Mixed 9 & 13 C R R ICD-9 4.9 (0.42) – –
35 1993 Herder Norway 50 909* – 1–17 C – – DSM-III-R 5.5 (1.04) – –
36 1996 Honda Japan 8 537 Urban 5 P C P ICD-10 21.1 (4.97) – –
37 1997 Arvidsson Sweden 1 941 Mixed 3–6 P C P ICD-10 31 (12.6) ICD-10 46 (15.36)
38 1997 Webb UK 73 300 Mixed 3–15 P L P DSM-III-R 7.2 (0.98) – –
39 1997 Fombonne France 325 347 Mixed 6–16 C R R ICD-10 5.35 (0.41) ICD-10 16.29 (0.71)
40 1998 Sponheim Norway 65 688 Mixed 3–14 P L P ICD-10 3.8 (0.76) ICD-10 5.2 (0.89)
41 1999 Kadesjo Sweden 826 Urban 6–7 P L P ICD-10 60 (26.87) Gillberg’s criteria 121 (38.04)
42 2000 Powell UK 16 049* Mixed 0 to ,5 S R R DSM-III-R or 16.2 (3.17) ICD-10 33.7 (1.48)
ICD-10**
43 2000 Kielinen Finland 152 732 Mixed 3–18 C R R ICD-10 5.6 (0.61) ICD-10 13.9 (0.95)
44 2000 Baird UK 16 235 Urban 1.5 P Q (CHAT) P ICD-10 30.8 (4.35) ICD-10 57.9 (5.95)
45 2001 Magnusson Iceland 43 153 Mixed 5–14` P C R ICD-10 8.6 (1.41) ICD-10 13.2 (1.75)
46 2001 Bertrand USA 8 896 Urban 3–10 P R P (where possible) DSM-IV 40.0 (6.69) DSM-IV 67 (8.65)
47 2001 Chakrabarti UK 15 500 Mixed 2.5–6.5 P C P DSM-IV 16.8 (3.29) DSM-IV 62.6 (6.34)
48 2002 Croen USA 4 590 333 Mixed 0–12 S R R DSM-III & 11.0 (0.15) – –
DSM-IV
49 2003 Lingam UK 186 206 Mixed 5–14 S R R ICD-10 14.9 (0.89) ICD-10 30.4 (1.28)
50 2004 Tebruegge UK 2 536 Mixed 8–9 P R R ICD-10 23.7 (9.7) ICD-10 82.8 (18.0)
ASD papers
51 2001 Fombonne UK 10 438 Mixed 5–15 P Q (DAWBA) P – – DSM-IV and ICD- 26.1 (5.0)
10 (excl Rett’s)
52 2002 Scott UK 43 472 Mixed 5–11 P L R – – ICD-10 57.0 (3.61)
53 2003 Yeargin-Allsopp USA 289 456 Urban 3–10 C R R – – DSM-IV 34 (1.08)
*Estimated from number of cases and prevalence estimate; Cohort first screened at 18 months, followed up until age 7–8 years; `Data from an older cohort also included in the study, but excluded from these analyses; 1Sample screened: P,
whole population; C, general clinical services; S, specialist clinical/educational services; Screen methods: C, routine checks; L, letter to elicit referrals; Q, questionnaires/interview; R, records (CHAT, Checklist for Autism in Toddlers; DAWBA,
Development and Well-Being Assessment); **ICD-10 used for analysis; DSM-IV used for analysis.
Williams, Higgins, Brayne
copyright.
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 11
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Study Study
copyright.
Croen, 2002 rise to higher prevalence estimates than studies carried out in
Lingam, 2003 rural or mixed locations (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.25;
Tebruegge, 2004 among-study variance explained = 53%). Studies that drew
on records of previous diagnostic assessments resulted in
lower prevalence estimates than those which included a
0.5 1 2.5 5 10 25 50 100 prospective diagnostic assessment (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.33 to
per 10 000 (log scale) 0.96; variance explained = 53%). Including region of study
provided the model that explained the most among-study
Figure 1 Forest plot of prevalence estimates and 95% confidence variance (variance explained = 61%) (table 3). In this final
intervals from studies of typical autism, log transformed (n = 37). model, using ICD-10 or DSM-IV led to prevalence estimates
three times those using other diagnostic criteria. The odds
information on study methodology was included in the ratio for age was 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), showing that an
English abstract of a Swedish paper.35 increase of one year in the age of the children screened led to
a significant reduction in prevalence estimates. For example,
Studies of typical autism when the odds ratio is taken to approximate a relative risk, if
The associations between study covariates and prevalence prevalence was estimated to be 10 per 10 000 in a sample of 5
estimates of typical autism from univariate meta-regression year olds, it would be expected to be around 9.1 per 10 000 in
analyses are shown in table 2. Taking account of the age of a sample of 6 year olds. Studies in Japan gave rise to
the children, for example, explained 23% of the among- prevalence estimates that were 3.6 times those in North
studies variance. America.
Diagnostic criteria and decade of publication were the
covariates that explained the most variance among studies in Studies of all ASD
the univariate analyses. These two covariates are collinear The associations between study covariates and prevalence
and it was not possible to include both in a multivariate estimates of all ASD from univariate meta-regression
model. The diagnostic criteria used were entered first into the analyses are shown in table 4. Only three covariates were
multivariate model since this was considered to be more significantly associated with the prevalence estimates: age of
directly related to variation in prevalence estimates than the children screened, urban or rural study location, and the
decade of publication, which is a proxy for all time varying diagnostic criteria used. The screen method used was of
covariates. The binary categorisation of diagnostic criteria borderline significance. Of these, diagnostic criteria explained
was used, as it was not possible to use multiple categories of most among-study variance, and was therefore included in
diagnostic criteria in a multivariate analysis with so few the multivariate analyses. Each of the other covariates was
studies. Age of the children screened also explained much introduced into the model in turn to form models with two
among-study variance, and was entered next into the model. covariates. As in the analyses of studies of typical autism, as
Models with three covariates were constructed which decade and diagnostic criteria were collinear, only the
included age, diagnostic criteria, and each remaining covariate for diagnostic criteria was included in further
covariate in turn. Screening method used, and whether the analyses. When adjusting for diagnostic criteria, the only
www.archdischild.com
12 Williams, Higgins, Brayne
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Table 2 Results of meta-regression of studies of typical autism, univariate analyses (n = 35)
Categories of covariate Variance
Covariate (first listed used as baseline) No. studies Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value t2 explained (%)
No covariates 35 – – – 0.98 –
Age Mid-point of age range 35 0.84 0.75 to 0.93 0.002 0.75 23
(continuous variable)
Decade 1960s and 1970s 3 1.00 – – 0.58 41
1980s 14 1.80 0.68 to 4.81 0.24
1990s 9 4.26 1.52 to 11.94 0.006
2000s 9 6.42 2.29 to 17.99 ,0.001
Region* N. America 6 1.00 – – 0.85 13
Japan 7 3.19 1.14 to 8.94 0.03
Europe and Scandinavia 22 2.05 0.87 to 4.85 0.10
Area Rural/mixed 24 1.00 – – 0.86 12
Urban 11 2.10 1.07 to 4.14 0.03
Sample screened Population based 21 1.00 – – 0.88 10
Clinic based 14 0.54 0.28 to 1.03 0.06
Screen method Routine checks 6 1.00 – – 0.77 21
Letter for referrals 13 0.28 0.12 to 0.68 0.005
Questionnaires 3 0.45 0.13 to 1.62 0.22
Records 13 0.53 0.22 to 1.27 0.16
Assessment Prospective 23 1.00 – – 0.95 3
Retrospective 12 0.73 0.37 to 1.46 0.38
Diagnostic criterion 1 Not ICD-10 or DSM-IV 21 1.00 – – 0.64 35
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 14 3.32 1.89 to 5.81 ,0.001
Diagnostic criterion 2 Kanner 5 1.00 – – 0.54 45
Rutter 4 1.38 0.51 to 3.71 0.53
DSM-III 8 1.95 0.84 to 4.57 0.12
DSM-III-R 3 3.29 1.13 to 9.58 0.03
ICD-9 1 1.82 0.37 to 8.85 0.46
ICD-10 11 5.10 2.29 to 11.47 ,0.001
DSM-IV 3 7.17 2.46 to 20.91 ,0.001
*Region = North America: USA and Canada; Japan; Europe (UK, France, Germany, Ireland) and Scandinavia (Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland).
Sample screened = whole population versus clinic based (general clinical services and clinic specialist services).
copyright.
Covariate Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value
*As an example, to estimate the prevalence of typical autism in 8 year old European children using ICD-10, take
10 0006(x/(1+x)), where x = 5.156102463.3660.91861.67, that is, a prevalence of 13.6 per 10 000.
covariates that were significantly associated with the and 20.0 per 10 000 for all ASD are slightly lower than those
prevalence estimates were the age of the children screened estimated previously at 8.7–10.0 per 10 000 and 27.5 per
(variance explained = 50%) and urban or rural study location 10 000 respectively.1 3
(variance explained = 53%). Both these models are presented The covariate most strongly associated with prevalence
(table 5). Using ICD-10 or DSM-IV gave rise to prevalence estimates for typical autism and all ASD was the diagnostic
estimates that were over twice those in studies using other criteria used. This association has been recognised pre-
diagnostic criteria. When including age in the model, an viously.2–4 The time variation in prevalence is so closely
increase in the age of the sample by one year was associated linked to changes in diagnostic criteria, the two could not be
with a fall in prevalence by a factor of approximately 0.85, examined separately. Furthermore, it was not possible to
taking the odds ratio as an approximation of a relative risk. account entirely for the effect of the diagnostic criteria on the
Alternatively, when including study location, studies in prevalence estimates as the ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnostic
urban areas gave rise to prevalence estimates over 2.5 times schema leave some scope for variation in their interpretation
those in rural or mixed urban and rural areas. and application.
The age of the children screened was strongly associated
DISCUSSION with the prevalence estimates. Manifestations of ASD may be
Main findings more obvious in younger children. Alternatively, some
As expected, a large amount of variation in prevalence across screening methods may be more sensitive for younger
studies was found by graphical representation of estimates children. Methods of screening were found to be significantly
and by indices of heterogeneity. Despite this wide variation, associated with the prevalence estimates in the univariate
pooled estimates are useful to indicate the public health analyses of typical autism, but not after adjusting for the age
burden of the disorder. The study variation is reflected in the of the children screened.
very large intervals on the summaries of overall prevalence. The multivariate model that explained most among-study
The estimates of around 7.1 per 10 000 for typical autism, variance in studies of typical autism included the region
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 13
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Table 4 Results of meta-regression of studies of all autism spectrum disorders, univariate analyses (n = 23)
Categories of covariate Variance
Covariate* (first listed used as baseline) No. studies Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value t2 explained (%)
No covariates 23 1.01
Age Mid-point of age range 23 0.82 0.72 to 0.94 0.005 0.74 27
(continuous variable)
Decade 1960s and 1970s 1 1.00 – – 0.43 57
1980s 6 0.29 0.07 to 1.19 0.09
1990s 5 0.93 0.22 to 3.94 0.92
2000s 11 1.75 0.44 to 6.89 0.42
Region N. America 4 1.00 – – 0.77 24
Japan 0 – – – – –
Europe 10 1.99 0.70 to 5.58 0.19
Scandinavia 9 0.72 0.25 to 2.05 0.54
Area Rural/mixed 17 1.00 – – 0.86 15
Urban 6 2.44 1.02 to 5.81 0.05
Sample screened Population based 14 1.00 – – 0.97 4
Clinic based 9 0.66 0.29 to 1.54 0.34
Screen method Routine checks 3 1.00 – – 0.72 29
Letter for referrals 9 0.31 0.10 to 0.98 0.05
Questionnaires 3 0.76 0.19 to 3.03 0.69
Records 8 0.93 0.30 to 2.97 0.91
Assessment Prospective 14 1.00 – – 0.96 5
Retrospective 9 1.52 0.66 to 3.49 0.32
Diagnostic criterion 1 Not ICD-10 or DSM-IV 9 1.00 – – 0.69 32
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 14 3.08 1.52 to 6.25 0.002
*Too few studies relative to the number of categories in diagnostic criterion 2 (criteria separately) were available to include this covariate in the analysis.
Table 5 Two multivariate meta-regression models for studies of all autism spectrum
disorders (n = 23)
Covariate Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value
copyright.
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 2.61 1.40 to 4.85 0.003
Age (years) 0.85 0.85 0.76 to 0.96 0.006
Intercept 1.4561023 1.4561023 3.2561024 to 6.4561023 ,0.001
studied, with studies from Japan having significantly higher method relied on records, these may have been more
estimates than North American studies. This could be due to complete in urban locations. If the screen method used
other study factors. For example, a higher proportion of the referrals from clinicians, it is possible that a higher
Japanese studies were from urban areas (4/7 (57%) studies) proportion of children were known to services in urban
compared to those in North America (1/6 (17%) studies). All locations. There may have been different diagnostic practices
the Japanese studies used prospective diagnostic assess- in urban locations where staff were more likely to be
ments, and all but one drew on whole population rather than employed at specialist healthcare centres than in rural
clinical samples. Due to the imposed limit of three covariates locations. It is easier to access the population in urban
in the model, it was not possible to adjust for further locations, and response rates may have been higher, but data
potential effect modifiers. Countries differ in their diagnostic on response were too limited to investigate this.
practice both in their theoretical background and their
training procedures for healthcare workers. This may, in Limitations and recommendations for future research
part, account for between-region variation in prevalence. Publication bias was not investigated in this review, as funnel
In an alternative model for typical autism, when adjusting plots were not considered appropriate due to the large degree
for age and diagnostic criteria, studies including prospective of variation across studies. It is unlikely that the set of papers
diagnostic assessments gave rise to higher prevalence published is biased with respect to prevalence reported.
estimates than those using retrospective records. This may However, it is possible that some studies were not identified
be linked to the use of different diagnostic methodology at in the searches if they were not published in mainstream
different times. Alternatively, an assessor taking part in journals. There may have been some time lag bias, with
prospective research studies might observe children more smaller studies, or studies with unremarkable results, coming
closely for symptoms of ASD. through to publication slower than larger studies.
When adjusting for diagnostic criteria, urban location was Of the papers identified for detailed examination, five
also observed to be associated with higher prevalence potentially eligible studies were excluded as they did not have
estimates for both typical autism and all ASD. If the screen a detailed English summary or were not peer reviewed. There
www.archdischild.com
14 Williams, Higgins, Brayne
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
is no reason to suspect that the lack of availability of data 6 Gillberg C, Wing L. Autism: not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatr
Scand 1999;99:399–406.
from these studies is a direct consequence of the prevalences 7 Wing L. The definition and prevalence of autism: a review. European Child
they might have observed. and Adolescent Psychiatry 1993;2:61–74.
The choice of coding of the covariates may have affected 8 Lewis S, Clarke M. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ
2001;322:1479–80.
the model, such as using the midpoint of the age range or 9 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-
grouping diverse diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, it was only analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.
possible to assess the impact of reported covariates, or easily 10 Whitehead A, Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-
analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 1991;10:1665–77.
quantifiable covariates. Qualitative influences on prevalence
11 Goodman SN. Meta-analysis and evidence. Control Clin Trials
such as awareness of autism in each population could not be 1989;10:188–204.
included. As more studies are published, it may be possible to 12 Sharp S. Meta-analysis regression. Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints
include new covariates or more precise coding of existing 2003;7(STB42):148–55.
13 Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall,
covariates in such a model. It would be valuable to have even 1991:349.
more thorough recording of study characteristics in future 14 Lotter V. Epidemiology of autistic conditions in young children. Social
studies to facilitate meta-analyses of studies. Psychiatry 1966;1:124–37.
15 Treffert DA. Epidemiology of infantile autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry
It is unlikely that it would ever be possible to measure and 1970;22:431–8.
record all potentially important covariates. An alternative 16 Brask BH. A prevalence investigation of childhood psychoses. Nordic
approach to investigating trends in prevalence, through symposium on the care of psychotic children. Oslo: Barnepsychiatrist
Forening, Universitetsforlagets Trykningssentral, 1970.
ongoing monitoring of defined school aged populations using
17 Wing L, Gould J. Severe impairments of social interaction and associated
standard methodology, has been recommended.1 This would abnormalities in children: epidemiology and classification. J Autism Dev
enable researchers to investigate changes in prevalence over Disord 1979;9:11–29.
time, and geographical variations while controlling for study 18 Hoshino Y, Kumashiro H, Yashima Y, et al. The epidemiological study of
autism in Fukushima-ken. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn 1982;36:115–24.
methodology. 19 Ishii T, Takahashi O. The epidemiology of autistic children in Toyota, Japan:
prevalence. Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
1983;24:311–21.
Conclusions 20 Bohman M, Bohman IL, Bjorck PO, et al. Childhood psychosis in a northern
This review has contributed to explaining some of the Swedish county: some preliminary findings from an epidemiological survey.
influences on variation among prevalence estimates. Over In: Schmidt M, Schmidt R, eds. Epidemiological approaches in child
psychiatry. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag, 1983:164–73.
half of the variation among study estimates can be explained 21 McCarthy P, Fitzgerald M, Smith MA. Prevalence of childhood autism in
by the age of the children screened, the diagnostic criteria Ireland. Ir Med J 1984;77:129–30.
used, and the country studied. Other important factors were 22 Gillberg C. Infantile autism and other childhood psychoses in a Swedish
urban region. Epidemiological aspects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
whether the study was in a rural or urban location and 1984;25:35–43.
whether cases were assessed prospectively or retrospectively. 23 Steinhausen HC, Gobel D, Breinlinger M, et al. A community survey of
The impact of these identified factors on prevalence estimates infantile autism. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1986;25:186–9.
24 Steffenburg S, Gillberg C. Autism and autistic-like conditions in Swedish rural
should now be further investigated as they may be acting as
copyright.
and urban areas: a population study. Br J Psychiatry 1986;149:81–7.
proxies for other influences on prevalence. For example, the 25 Burd L, Fisher W, Kerbeshian J. A prevalence study of pervasive
effect of geographical location on prevalence may be due to developmental disorders in North Dakota. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
the services available, or variation in awareness of the Psychiatry 1987;26:700–3.
26 Matsuishi T, Shiotsuki Y, Yoshimura K, et al. High prevalence of infantile
disorder. By taking this quantitative approach, this review autism in Kurume City, Japan. J Child Neurol 1987;2:268–71.
has shown that using meta-analytic techniques can be a 27 Tanoue Y, Oda S, Asano F, et al. Epidemiology of infantile autism in southern
valuable additional tool in deepening our understanding of Ibaraki, Japan: differences in prevalence in birth cohorts. J Autism Dev Disord
1988;18:155–66.
the influences of study and population characteristics on 28 Bryson SE, Clark BS, Smith IM. First report of a Canadian epidemiological
variation in prevalence estimates in autism spectrum study of autistic syndromes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1988;29:433–45.
disorders. 29 Ritvo ER, Freeman BJ, Pingree C, et al. The UCLA–University of Utah
epidemiologic survey of autism: prevalence. Am J Psychiatry
1989;146:194–9.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 30 Sugiyama T, Abe T. The prevalence of autism in Nagoya, Japan: a total
This work forms part of a PhD thesis entitled ‘‘Screening for autism population study. J Autism Dev Disord 1989;19:87–96.
spectrum disorders’’ (University of Cambridge, 2003). Jo Williams 31 Cialdella P, Mamelle N. An epidemiological study of infantile autism in a
(née Johnson) held an MRC studentship, and subsequently received French department (Rhone): a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
1989;30:165–75.
funding from the Shirley Foundation. We wish to thank Prof Patrick
32 Gillberg C, Steffenburg S, Schaumann H. Is autism more common now than
Bolton and Prof Simon Baron-Cohen for their comments on an ten years ago? Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:403–9.
earlier draft of this paper. 33 Ohtaki E, Kawano Y, Urabe F, et al. The prevalence of Rett syndrome and
infantile autism in Chikugo District, the southwestern area of Fukuoka
..................... prefecture, Japan [letter]. J Autism Dev Disord 1992;22:452–4.
34 Fombonne E, du Mazaubrun C. Prevalence of infantile autism in four French
Authors’ affiliations regions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1992;27:203–10.
J G Williams, C E G Brayne, Department of Public Health and Primary 35 Herder GA. [Infantile autism among children in the county of Nordland.
Care, University of Cambridge, UK Prevalence and etiology]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1993;113:2247–9.
J P T Higgins, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK and Public Health 36 Honda H, Shimizu Y, Misumi K, et al. Cumulative incidence and prevalence of
Genetics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK childhood autism in children in Japan. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169:228–35.
37 Arvidsson T, Danielsson B, Forsberg P, et al. Autism in 3-6-year-old children
Competing interests: none declared in a suburb of Goteborg, Sweden. Autism 1997;1:163–73.
38 Webb EV, Lobo S, Hervas A, et al. The changing prevalence of autistic
disorder in a Welsh health district. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:150–2.
39 Fombonne E, du Mazaubrun C, Cans C, et al. Autism and associated medical
REFERENCES disorders in a French epidemiological survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
1 Fombonne E. Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive Psychiatry 1997;36:1561–9.
developmental disorders: an update. J Autism Dev Disord 2003;33:365–82. 40 Sponheim E, Skjeldal O. Autism and related disorders: epidemiological
2 Wing L, Potter D. The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: is the findings in a Norwegian study using ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. J Autism Dev
prevalence rising? Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Disord 1998;28:217–27.
Research Review 2002;8:151–61. 41 Kadesjo B, Gillberg C, Hagberg B. Brief report: autism and Asperger
3 Fombonne E. Epidemiological trends in rates of autism. Mol Psychiatry syndrome in seven-year-old children: a total population study. J Autism Dev
2002;7(suppl 2):S4–6. Disord 1999;29:327–31.
4 Charman T. The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders. Recent evidence 42 Powell JE, Edwards A, Edwards M, et al. Changes in the incidence of
and future challenges. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;11:249–56. childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders in preschool children
5 Fombonne E. The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychol Med from two areas of the West Midlands, UK. Dev Med Child Neurol
1999;29:769–86. 2000;42:624–8.
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 15
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
43 Kielinen M, Linna SL, Moilanen I. Autism in Northern Finland. Eur Child 49 Lingam R, Simmons A, Andrews N, et al. Prevalence of autism and parentally
Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;9:162–7. reported triggers in a north east London population. Arch Dis Child
44 Baird G, Charman T, Baron-Cohen S, et al. A screening instrument for autism 2003;88:666–70.
at 18 months of age: a 6-year follow- up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc 50 Tebruegge M, Nandini V, Ritchie J. Does routine child health surveillance
Psychiatry 2000;39:694–702. contribute to the early detection of children with pervasive developmental
45 Magnusson P, Saemundsen E. Prevalence of autism in Iceland. J Autism Dev disorders? An epidemiological study in Kent, U.K. BMC Pediatr 2004;4:4.
Disord 2001;31:153–63. 51 Fombonne E, Simmons H, Ford T, et al. Prevalence of pervasive
46 Bertrand J, Mars A, Boyle C, et al. Prevalence of autism in a United States developmental disorders in the British nationwide survey of child mental
population: the Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation. Pediatrics health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:820–7.
2001;108:1155–61. 52 Scott F, Baron-Cohen S, Bolton P, et al. Brief report: prevalence of autism
47 Chakrabarti S, Fombonne E. Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool spectrum conditions in children aged 5–11 years in Cambridgeshire, UK.
children. JAMA 2001;285:3093–9. Autism 2002;6:231–7.
48 Croen LA, Grether JK, Hoogstrate J, et al. The changing prevalence of autism 53 Yeargin-Allsopp M, Rice C, Karapurkar T, et al. Prevalence of autism in a US
in California. J Autism Dev Disord 2002;32:207–15. metropolitan area. JAMA 2003;289:49–55.
copyright.
Being a contributor involves:
N Selecting from a validated, screened search (performed by in-house Information
Specialists) epidemiologically sound studies for inclusion.
N Documenting your decisions about which studies to include on an inclusion and exclusion
form, which we keep on file.
N Writing the text to a highly structured template (about 1500-3000 words), using evidence
from the final studies chosen, within 8-10 weeks of receiving the literature search.
N Working with Clinical Evidence editors to ensure that the final text meets epidemiological
and style standards.
N Updating the text every 12 months using any new, sound evidence that becomes available.
The Clinical Evidence in-house team will conduct the searches for contributors; your task is
simply to filter out high quality studies and incorporate them in the existing text.
If you would like to become a contributor for Clinical Evidence or require more information
about what this involves please send your contact details and a copy of your CV, clearly
stating the clinical area you are interested in, to CECommissioning@bmjgroup.com.
Clinical Evidence also needs to recruit a number of new peer reviewers specifically with an
interest in the clinical areas stated above, and also others related to general practice. Peer
reviewers are healthcare professionals or epidemiologists with experience in evidence-based
medicine. As a peer reviewer you would be asked for your views on the clinical relevance,
validity, and accessibility of specific topics within the journal, and their usefulness to the
intended audience (international generalists and healthcare professionals, possibly with
limited statistical knowledge). Topics are usually 1500-3000 words in length and we would
ask you to review between 2-5 topics per year. The peer review process takes place
throughout the year, and out turnaround time for each review is ideally 10-14 days.
If you are interested in becoming a peer reviewer for Clinical Evidence, please complete the
peer review questionnaire at www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/contribute/peerreviewer.jsp
www.archdischild.com
UB Official BITS SIAM Webmail Presetya
HOME ABOUT LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES ANNOUNCEMENTS SITE MAP CONTACT
ARTICLE TOOLS
Systematic Literature Review: Intervention for Behaviour
Print this article
Problems of Young Children with Autistic Spectrum
Indexing metadata
Disorder (ASD) How to cite item
Dede Supriyanto Email this article (Login required)
Online Submissions
Behaviour Problem; young children with autism; behaviour intervention
Author Guidelines
Download Template
Full Text:
PDF Download Copyright Form
INDEX
References
Reviewed References
Google Scholar
Blair, K.-S. C., Fox, L., & Lentini, R. (2010). Use of Positive Behavior
Support to Address the Challenging Behavior of Young Children Within
a Community Early Childhood Program. Topics in Early Childhood
Special Education, 30(2), 68-79. doi:doi:10.1177/0271121410372676
Crossref
Blair, K.-S. C., Lee, I.-S., Cho, S.-J., & Dunlap, G. (2010). Positive
Behavior Support Through Family–School Collaboration for Young
Children With Autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
31(1), 22-36. doi:10.1177/0271121410377510
Sinta
Boyd, B. A., McDonough, S. G., Rupp, B., Khan, F., & Bodfish, J. W.
(2011). Effects of a Family-Implemented Treatment on the Repetitive OneSearch
Behaviors of Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1330-1341. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-
1156-y
Carr, E. G., & Blakeley-Smith, A. (2006). Classroom Intervention for
Illness-Related Problem Behavior in Children With Developmental
Disabilities. Behavior Modification, 30(6), 901-924.
KanalTidsskriftInfo
doi:10.1177/0145445506290080
Conroy, M. A., Asmus, J. M., Sellers, J. A., & Ladwig, C. N. (2005). The
TOOLS
use of an antecedent-based intervention to decrease stereotypic
behavior in a general education classroom: A case study. Focus on
Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 223-230.
Mendeley
Eikeseth, S., Klintwall, L., Jahr, E., & Karlsson, P. (2012). Outcome for
children with autism receiving early and intensive behavioral Mendeley User Guide
Insert Citation using Mendeley
intervention in mainstream preschool and kindergarten settings.
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 829-835.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.09.002
Grammarly
Fulton, E., Eapen, V., Črnčec, R., Walter, A., & Rogers, S. (2014).
Reducing maladaptive behaviors in preschool-aged children with autism
spectrum disorder using the Early Start Denver Model. Frontiers in
pediatrics, 2, 40. Turnitin
Lang, R., O'Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M.,
NOTIFICATIONS
Lancioni, G. E., . . . Fragale, C. (2010). The Effects of an Abolishing
Operation Intervention Component on Play Skills, Challenging View
Subscribe
Behavior, and Stereotypy. Behavior Modification, 34(4), 267-289.
doi:doi:10.1177/0145445510370713 JOURNAL CONTENT
Strain, P. S., & Bovey, E. H. (2011). Randomized, Controlled Trial of the behaviour intervention disability employment
physiotherapy sexuality visual impairment young
LEAP Model of Early Intervention for Young Children With Autism children with autism
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2019.007.01.6
Refbacks
There are currently no refbacks.
ABSTRACT User
Username
Interaksi sosial adalah hubungan manusia dengan manusia lainnya atau Password
hubungan manusia dengan kelompok atau hubungan kelompok dengan Remember me
intervensi terapi musik terhadap kemampuan interaksi sosial pada anak Notifications
autisme. Metode penelitian berupa systematic review ini dimulai dari
» View
pencarian data menggunakan 5 database yaitu Science Direct, PuBmed, » Subscribe
SAGE, Taylor & Francis Online (Tandfonline), dan Google Scholar dengan
Journal Content
rentang tahun 2013-2020 dengan jumlah 1.031 artikel. Ditemukan 9 artikel
yang memenuhi kriteria yang dinilai menggunakan the JBI critical appraisal Search
tools. Hasil telaah artikel yang telah dilakukan adalah terapi musik diberikan
Search Scope
dengan berbagai metode seperti improvisasi, mendengarkan musik, dan
All
menyanyi. Jenis musik yang diberikan adalah murrotal Al-Qur’an, musik Search
klasik, dan musik instrumental. Kesimpulan dari telaah artikel ini adalah
Browse
metode yang bisa diberikan adalah metode improvisasi dengan durasi waktu
» By Issue
minimal 30 menit dan durasi waktu maksimal adalah 60 menit. Jenis musik » By Author
» By Title
yang bisa diberikan adalah murrotal Al-Qur’an dan musik klasik. Rekomendasi » Other Journals
dalam penelitian adalah melakukan intervensi terapi musik dengan metode
Font Size
improvisasi, jenis musik murrotal Al-Qur’an dan musik klasik.
KEYWORDS
FULL TEXT:
PDF
REFERENCES
Anam, A., Khasanah, U., & Isworo, A. (2019). Terapi Audio dengan Murottal
Alquran Terhadap Perilaku Anak Autis: Literature Review. 1(2):81–83
Daulay N-. (2017). Struktur Otak dan Keberfungsiannya pada Anak dengan
Gangguan Spektrum Autis: Kajian Neuropsikologi. Bul Psikol. 25(1):11–25.
https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25163
Fueyo M, Caldwell T, Mattern SB, Zahid J, Foley T. (2015). The health home:
A service delivery model for autism and intellectual disability. Psychiatr Serv.
2015;66(11):1135–7
Idayanti, & Sartika, D. (2016). Efektivitas Terapi Musik Klasik Mozart terhadap
Memori Anak Penyandang Autis. Proteksi Kesehatan; 5(2)
Kriswanto YJ. (2020). Peran Musik Sebagai Media Intervensi Dalam Lingkup
Praktik Klinis. J Seni dan Desain ;2(3):81–6
Maria, S., Fitryasari, R., & Endang, H. (2014). Pengaruh Terapi Musik Mozart
Terhadap Penurunan Perilaku Tantrum Pada Anak Autisme Di Sekolah Autis
Harapan Bunda Surabaya ;2(1)
Mössler, K., Gold, C., Aßmus, J., Schumacher, K., Calvet, C., Reimer, S.,
Iversen, G., & Schmid, W. (2017). The Therapeutic Relationship as Predictor
of Change in Music Therapy with Young Children with Autism Spectrum
Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders; 0(0):0
ARTICLE METRICS
Abstract view : 280 times
PDF - 132 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jkj.9.2.2021.243-250
REFBACKS
There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats
Phone: 02476740287
Fax: 02476740287
Email: jurkep.jiwa@gmail.com
Log in
Advanced
Review
Show details
Abstract
According to a recent influential proposal, several
phenotypic features of autism spectrum disorder
(ASD) may be accounted for by differences in
predictive skills between individuals with ASD and
neurotypical individuals. In this systematic review,
we describe results from 47 studies that have
empirically tested this hypothesis. We assess the
results based on two observable aspects of
prediction: learning a pairing between an
antecedent and a consequence and responding to
an antecedent in a predictive manner. Taken
together, these studies suggest distinct differences
in both predictive learning and predictive response.
Studies documenting differences in learning
predictive pairings indicate challenges in detecting
such relationships especially when predictive
features of an antecedent have low salience or
consistency, and studies showing differences in
habituation and perceptual adaptation suggest
low-level predictive processing differences in ASD.
These challenges may account for the observed
differences in the influence of predictive priors, in
spontaneous predictive movement or gaze, and in
social prediction. An important goal for future
research will be to better define and constrain the
broad domain-general hypothesis by testing
multiple types of prediction within the same
individuals. Additional promising avenues include
studying prediction within naturalistic contexts and
assessing the effect of prediction-based
intervention on supporting functional outcomes for
individuals with ASD. LAY SUMMARY: Researchers
have suggested that many features of autism
spectrum disorder (ASD) may be explained by
differences in the prediction skills of people with
ASD. We review results from 47 studies. These
studies suggest that ASD may be associated with
differences in the learning of predictive pairings
(e.g., learning cause and effect) and in low-level
predictive processing in the brain (e.g., processing
repeated sounds). These findings lay the
groundwork for research that can improve our
understanding of ASD and inform interventions.
Autism Res 2021, 14: 604-630. © 2021
International Society for Autism Research and Wiley
Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
Cited by 1 article
Publication types
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder*
Autistic Disorder*
Brain
Humans
Learning
Motivation
Related information
MedGen
Grant support
T32 DC000038/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
Medical
Genetic Alliance
MedlinePlus Health Information
FOLLOW NCBI
Web Policies
FOIA
Help
Accessibility
Careers
TRANSTORNO DO ESPECTRO
AUTISTA: UMA REVISÃO
SISTEMÁTICA SOBRE
INTERVENÇÕES NUTRICIONAIS
Manuela Albernaz Monteiro, Andressa Assumpção Abreu
dos Santos, [...], and Rosane Valéria Viana Fonseca Rito
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Data sources:
Data synthesis:
Conclusions:
RESUMO
Objetivo:
Identificar e analisar as evidências científicas de intervenções
nutricionais realizadas em crianças e adolescentes com
Transtorno do Espectro Autista.
Fontes de dados:
Realizou-se uma revisão sistemática nas bases de dados
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, Google
Acadêmico, PubMed, PsycINFO e Periódicos CAPES
utilizando estratégia de busca abrangente para identificar
estudos publicados entre janeiro de 2003 e março de 2018,
em língua portuguesa, inglesa e espanhola. Foram incluídos
estudos que descreveram intervenções nutricionais em
crianças e adolescentes com Transtorno do Espectro Autista e
avaliaram sintomas comportamentais e/ou sintomas
gastrintestinais, sendo excluídos artigos de revisão e estudos
que não incluíram um grupo controle em seu delineamento.
Os estudos foram examinados para obter informações
descritivas, e a qualidade de evidência foi avaliada por meio
do Sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations
Assessment, Development and Evaluation).
Conclusões:
Embora alguns autores exponham progressos nos sintomas
associados ao autismo em indivíduos com esse transtorno
submetidos a intervenções nutricionais, há poucas evidências
científicas para apoiar o uso destas em crianças e
adolescentes com autismo.
INTRODUCTION
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental
disorder that encompasses Autism, Rett Syndrome,
Asperger’s Syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder, and
global developmental disorder without further specification.
Currently, 1% of the world’s population is diagnosed with
ASD. 1 In the United States, the prevalence of this disorder is
one in 68 eight-year-olds. 2
METHOD
The study was conducted through a research strategy that
considered the terms that characterize the research question
structured by the Population, Intervention, Comparison and
Outcome (PICO) method (Table 1). The databases used were
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase and LILACS, in
addition to the Google Scholar, PubMed, PsycINFO and
CAPES Periodical aggregating systems. A manual search was
also performed by checking the list of “Bibliographical
References” of the studies included in the review. To increase
search sensitivity and ensure satisfactory search retrieval, we
used, in addition to controlled vocabulary (descriptors), text
words, synonyms, keywords and spelling variations, which
were combined using Boolean operators. The following
search terms and sequences were used: “autistic disorder” OR
“autism spectrum disorder” OR “Asperger syndrome” OR
“autism” OR “disorder, autistic” OR “Asperger disease” OR
“Asperger disorder” AND “nutrition therapy” OR “medical
nutrition therapy” OR “nutritional status” OR “nutrition” OR
“diet modifications” OR “diet therapies” OR “diet, gluten-
free” OR “gluten-free diet, and their respective translations
into Portuguese and Spanish.
Table 1
Table 1
Acronym for the population, intervention, comparison
and outcome method.
RESULTS
From the initial searches, 876 articles were selected, 848 from
searches in aggregators and databases and 28 from searches
from other sources. The duplicates were discarded (n = 161)
and the reviewers selected articles by reading the titles and
abstracts, resulting in the exclusion of 676 articles that,
despite fitting the search strategy, did not address the theme
studied. After the exclusion of the articles, 39 texts were read
in full, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied,
resulting in the analysis of 18 articles for the present study
(Figure 1). Of the 18 articles included, 16 were randomized
controlled trials (RCT), 9 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ,
23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 and only five of them did not use
the double-blind model. 19 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 29 The total number
of participants in the interventions was 639, the smallest
analyzed was of 12 children 26 and the largest was of 76. 21
Participants’ ages ranged from two to 18 years old.
Intervention time ranged from seven days to 24 months,
showing a very diverse duration between interventions.
Regarding the location of each study, it was observed that
most were conducted in the United States (n = 9),
representing 50% of the total. Four studies were conducted in
Europe and the other five studies were conducted in Asia.
Regarding quality, the articles were evaluated according to
the GRADE System: six articles were classified in category
A, 16 , 18 , 19 , 28 , 29 , 30 showing low risk of bias and
highly reliable evidence; ten articles were in category B, 9 ,
17 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 31 with moderate risk of
bias and reliable evidence; and two articles were in category
C, 16 , 21 indicating a high risk of bias and poor quality of
evidence.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of studies selected for review.
DISCUSSION
The present review identified the most frequently
implemented nutritional interventions in the treatment of
children and adolescents with ASD and evaluated the quality
and effectiveness of these interventions, as well as the
possible limitations present in the current literature on the
subject.
Funding
The study did not receive funding.
Article information
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020; 38: e2018262.
Published online 2020 Mar 16. doi: 10.1590/1984-
0462/2020/38/2018262
PMCID: PMC7077797
PMID: 32187297
Manuela Albernaz Monteiro, a Andressa Assumpção Abreu
dos Santos, a Lidiane Martins Mendes Gomes, a ,* and Rosane
Valéria Viana Fonseca Rito a
aUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
*Corresponding author. E-mail:
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental disorders. DSM-5. Washington
(USA): American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [Google
Scholar]
2. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring
Network Surveillance Year 2008 Principal Investigators;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Prevalence of
Autism Spectrum Disorders - Autism and Developmental
Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States,
2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012;61:1–19. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
3. Silva NI. Relação entre hábito alimentar e a síndrome do
espectro autista. Piracicaba (SP): Escola Superior de
Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo,
Piracicaba; 2011. master’s thesis. [Google Scholar]
4. Rutter M. A etiology of autism: findings and questions. J
Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:231–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2788.2005.00676.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Sandin S, Lichtenstein P, Kuja-Halkola R, Larsson H,
Hultman C, Reichenberg A. The familial risk of autism.
JAMA. 2014;311:1770–1777. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4144.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Panksepp J. A neurochemical theory of autism. Trends
Neurosci. 1979;2:174–177. doi: 10.1016/0166-
2236(79)90071-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Reichelt KL, Knivsberg AM. Can the pathophysiology of
autism be explained by the nature of the discovered urine
peptides? Nutr Neurosci. 2003;6:19–28.
doi: 10.1080/1028415021000042839. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
8. Wakefield AJ, Puleston JM, Montgomery SM, Anthony A,
O’Leary JJ, Murch SH. The concept of entero-colonic
encephalopathy, autism and opioid receptor ligands. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:663–674. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-
2036.2002.01206.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Adams JB, Holloway C. Pilot study of a moderate dose
multivitamin mineral supplement for children with autistic
spectrum disorder. J Altern Complement Med.
2004;10:1033–1039. doi: 10.1089/acm.2004.10.1033.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Feucht S, Beth O, Lucas B. Nutrition concerns of children
with autism spectrum disorders. Nutrition Focus. 2010;25:1–
13. [Google Scholar]
11. Millward C, Ferriter M, Calver S, Connell-Jones G.
Gluten and casein-free diets for autistic spectrum disorder.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16:CD003498–
CD003498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003498.pub3. [PMC
free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Gadia CA, Tuchman R, Rotta NT. Autismo e doenças
invasivas de desenvolvimento. J Pediatr. 2004;80(Suppl.):83–
94. doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572004000300011. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência,
Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Ciência
e Tecnologia. Coordenação-Geral de Gestão do
Conhecimento . Sistema GRADE: manual de graduação da
qualidade da evidência e força de recomendação para tomada
de decisão em saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. 71
p. Livroilus, tab, graf. [Google Scholar]
14. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y,
Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on
rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
BMJ. 2008;336:924–926.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Al-Ayadhi LY, Elamin NE. Camel milk as a potential
therapy as an antioxidant in autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:602834–
602834. doi: 10.1155/2013/602834. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Amminger GP, Berger GE, Schäfer MR, Klier C,
Friedrich MH, Feucht M. Omega-3 fatty acids
supplementation in children with autism: a double-blind
randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Biol Psychiatry.
2007;61:551–553. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.007.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Bent S, Bertoglio K, Ashwood P, Bostrom A, Hendren
RL. A pilot randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty
acids for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord.
2011;41:545–554. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1078-8. [PMC
free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Bent S, Hendren RL, Zandi T, Law K, Choi JE, Widjaja F,
et al. Internet-based, randomized, controlled trial of omega-3
fatty acids for hyperactivity in autism. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:658–666.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.01.018. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Chan AS, Sze SL, Han YM, Cheung M-C. A Chan dietary
intervention enhances executive functions and anterior
cingulate activity in autism spectrum disorders: a randomized
controlled trial. Evid-Based Complementary Altern Med.
2012;11 doi: 10.1155/2012/262136. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Elder JH, Shankar M, Shuster J, Theriaque D, Burns S,
Sherrill L. The gluten-free, casein-free diet in autism: results
of a preliminary double blind clinical trial. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2006;36:413–420. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0079-0.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Ghalichi F, Ghaemmaghami J, Malek A, Ostadrahimi A.
Effect of gluten free diet on gastrointestinal and behavioral
indices for children with autism spectrum disorders: a
randomized clinical trial. World J Pediatr. 2016;12:436–442.
doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0040-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
22. Hendren R, James S, Widjaja F, Lawton B, Rosenblatt A,
Bent S. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of methyl b12
for children with autism. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol.
2016;26:774–783. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0159. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Hyman SL, Stewart PA, Foley J, Peck R, Morris DD,
Wang H, et al. The gluten-free/casein-free diet: a double-
blind challenge trial in children with autism. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2016;46:205–220. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2564-9.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson CR, Handen BL, Zimmer M, Sacco K, Turner K.
Effects of gluten free/casein free diet in young children with
autism: a pilot study. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2011;23:213–225.
doi: 10.1007/s10882-010-9217-x. [CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
25. Knivsberg AM, Reichelt KL, Høien T, Nødland M. A
randomised, controlled study of dietary intervention in
autistic syndromes. Nutr Neurosci. 2002;5:251–261.
doi: 10.1080/10284150290028945. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
26. Navarro F, Pearson DA, Fatheree N, Mansour R, Hashmi
SS, Rhoads JM. Are ‘leaky gut’ and behavior associated with
gluten and dairy containing diet in children with autism
spectrum disorders? Nutr Neurosci. 2015;18:177–185.
doi: 10.1179/1476830514Y.0000000110. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Pusponegoro HD, Ismael S, Sastroasmoro S, Firmansyah
A, Vandenplas Y. Maladaptive behavior and gastrointestinal
disorders in children with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatr
Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2015;18:230–237.
doi: 10.5223/pghn.2015.18.4.230. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Voigt RG, Mellon MW, Katusic SK, Weaver AL, Matern
D, Mellon B, et al. Dietary docosahexaenoic acid
supplementation in children with autism. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:715–722.
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000260. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Whiteley P, Haracopos D, Knivsberg AM, Reichelt KL,
Parlar S, Jacobsen J, et al. The ScanBrit randomised,
controlled, single-blind study of a gluten- and casein-free
dietary intervention for children with autism spectrum
disorders. Nutr Neurosci. 2010;13:87–100.
doi: 10.1179/147683010X12611460763922. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Guo M, Zhu J, Yang T, Lai X, Liu X, Liu J, et al. Vitamin
A improves the symptoms of autism spectrum disorders and
decreases 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT): a pilot study. Brain
Res Bull. 2018;137:35–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.11.001. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. El-Rashidy O, El-Baz F, El-Gendy Y, Khalaf R, Reda D,
Saad K. Ketogenic diet versus gluten free casein free diet in
autistic children: a case-control study. Metab Brain Dis.
2017;32:1935–1941. doi: 10.1007/s11011-017-0088-z.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Sathe N, Andrews JC, McPheeters ML, Warren ZE.
Nutrition and dietary interventions for Autism Spectrum
Disorder: a systematic review. Pediatrics.
2017;139:e2017034. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0346. [PubMed]
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Mulloy A, Lang R, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Lancioni G,
Rispoli M. Gluten-free and casein-free diets in the treatment
of autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Res
Autism Spectr Disord. 2010;4:328–339.
doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.10.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Dias EC Rocha, JS Ferreira, GB Pena GG. isenta de
glúten e caseína no transtorno do espectro autista: uma
revisão sistemática. Rev Cuidarte. 2018;9:2059–2073.
doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.v9i1.485. [CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
Table 1
8
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Aim: To quantitatively examine the influence of study methodology and population characteristics on
prevalence estimates of autism spectrum disorders.
Methods: Electronic databases and bibliographies were searched and identified papers evaluated against
See end of article for inclusion criteria. Two groups of studies estimated the prevalence of typical autism and all autism spectrum
authors’ affiliations disorders (ASD). The extent of variation among studies and overall prevalence were estimated using meta-
.......................
analysis. The influence of methodological factors and population characteristics on estimated prevalence
Correspondence to: was investigated using meta-regression and summarised as odds ratios (OR).
Dr J G Williams, Results: Forty studies met inclusion criteria, of which 37 estimated the prevalence of typical autism, and 23
Department of Public
Health and Primary Care, the prevalence of all ASD. A high degree of heterogeneity among studies was observed. The overall
University of Cambridge, random effects estimate of prevalence across studies of typical autism was 7.1 per 10 000 (95% CI 1.6 to
Forvie Site, Robinson 30.6) and of all ASD was 20.0 per 10 000 (95% CI 4.9 to 82.1). Diagnostic criteria used (ICD-10 or
Way, Cambridge CB2
2SR, UK; j.g.williams.97@ DSM-IV versus other; OR = 3.36, 95% CI 2.07 to 5.46), age of the children screened (OR = 0.91 per year,
cantab.net 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), and study location (e.g. Japan versus North America; OR = 3.60, 95% CI 1.73 to
7.46) were all significantly associated with prevalence of typical autism. Diagnostic criteria, age of the
Accepted sample, and urban or rural location were associated with estimated prevalence of all ASD.
22 December 2004
Published Online First
Conclusions: Sixty one per cent of the variation in prevalence estimates of typical autism was explained by
29 April 2005 these models. Diagnostic criteria used, age of children screened, and study location may be acting as
....................... proxies for other study characteristics and require further investigation.
copyright.
T
he prevalence of autistic disorder is now considered to be Study selection
around 10 per 10 000, and the prevalence of pervasive Identified papers were examined against criteria for inclusion
developmental disorders, 27.5 per 10 000. These are (box 2). The paper itself was examined if the abstract was
derived from studies which have estimated prevalences of
autistic disorder ranging from 0.7 to 72.6 per 10 000.1 An
increase in prevalence estimates has been observed over time, Box 1: Search strategy for identifying
the reasons for which are not clear and may include: changes prevalence studies
in study methodology; a genuine rise in autism risk factors;
increase in services available, including diagnostic; increased MEDLINE (PubMed) (searched 13/04/04)
awareness among educational and clinical professionals; and Years (1966–2004):
growing acceptance that autism can coexist with a range of (‘‘Autistic-Disorder’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR
other conditions.1–4 ‘‘Asperger-Syndrome’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR
True variation in prevalence could generate aetiological ‘‘Schizophrenia-Childhood’’/all subheadings [MeSH] and
hypotheses for autism and it is vital to understand what (PY = 1966–1970) OR autis* (free text term)) AND
underpins the variation. Accurate estimates of the true (‘‘Prevalence-‘‘/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Cross-
prevalence are of value in planning diagnostic and interven- Sectional-Studies’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Mass-
tion services. Screening’’/all subheadings [MeSH] OR ‘‘Multiphasic-
Several narrative reviews have been conducted. This paper Screening’’/all subheadings [MeSH]).
uses systematic and quantitative methods to examine reasons
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) (searched 13/04/04)
for variation in prevalence estimates. The aims are to assess
(BIDS EMBASE, via Ovid, copyright 2003)
the degree of variation among prevalence studies of autism,
Years (1980–2004):
and to provide an overall summary of prevalence diversity
(exp` autism/ OR exp infantile autism/ OR exp Asperger
taking into account among-study variance using meta-
syndrome/ OR autism.mp1 (as keyword) OR Asperger.mp
analysis. Aspects of study methodology and population
(as keyword)) AND (exp prevalence/ OR exp mass screen-
characteristics are then examined using meta-regression to
ing/ OR exp screening/ OR cross-sectional.mp (as key-
investigate their influence on prevalence estimates. word)) NOT (genetic screening/exp OR genetic screen.mp
(as keyword).
METHODS
Literature searches MeSH (Medical Subjects Headings), The National Library of
Two databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were systematically Medicine controlled vocabulary for indexing articles in
searched by the first author (box 1). In addition, bibliogra- PubMed; `exp, explode term (search under all subheadings);
phies of previous reviews1 5 6 were examined to identify 1mp, uses the database thesaurus search term.
published prevalence studies.
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 9
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
insufficiently clear. Where there was more than one paper for the true prevalence was calculated as the mean of
published on a particular study, the most recent was included logits ¡ 1.96 t, where t is the among-study standard
in the review. deviation.11
copyright.
examined the null hypothesis that the true prevalences are the basis of 7. In addition, four papers did not have detailed
identical in every study. Since heterogeneity was expected a English summaries, one was not peer reviewed, and two were
priori, this was supplemented with a measure of the degree of untraceable. Of these seven potentially eligible studies, four
inconsistency across studies, I2.9 I2 describes the proportion of were conducted in Japan, one in the USA, one in France, and
variation in prevalence estimates that is due to genuine one in Sweden.
variation in prevalences rather than sampling error. It is Forty papers met inclusion criteria, of which 37 gave
expressed as a percentage, with 0% indicating consistency. estimates for typical autism and 23 for all ASD (table 1). The
The random effects model assumes the study prevalences study sample sizes ranged from 826 to 4 590 333 (med-
follow a normal distribution, allowing for among-study ian = 48 705). Only 17 (40%) studies reported the refusal rate
variation.10 The usual confidence interval for the mean in at the screen phase of the study, and 13 (33%) at the
the random effects model does not take among-study assessment stage. Six (15%) studies reported investigating
variance into account, so is deceptively narrow when there the reliability of their screen method, and 11 (26%) studies
is substantial variation across studies. Instead, a 95% interval stated that the inter-rater reliability for the diagnostic
assessment had been investigated. Many studies did not
report refusal rates and reliability, so these covariates could
Box 2: Inclusion criteria not be included in further analyses.
www.archdischild.com
10
Prospective(P)/ Prevalence
Publ. Sample Screen retrospective (R) Diagnostic estimate (per Diagnostic Prevalence estimate
Ref. year First author Country Sample size Area Age (years) screened1 methods assessment criteria used 10 000) (SE) criteria used (per 10 000) (SE)
www.archdischild.com
14 1966 Lotter UK 78 000 Urban 8–10 P Q P Kanner 4.5 (0.76) – –
15 1970 Treffert USA 899 750 Mixed 0–12 C R R Kanner 0.7 (0.09) – –
16 1970 Brask Denmark 46 500 Urban 2–14 S – – Kanner 4.3 (0.96) – –
17 1979 Wing UK 35 000 Urban 0–15 C R P Kanner 4.9 (1.18) Triad 21.2 (2.46)
18 1982 Hoshino Japan 609 848 Mixed 0–18 P L P Kanner 2.33 (0.20) – –
19 1983 Ishii Japan 34 987 Urban 6–12 P L P Rutter 16.0 (2.14) – –
20 1983 Bohman Sweden 69 000 Mixed 0–20 P L P Rutter 3.0 (0.66) Rutter 5.6 (0.9)
21 1984 McCarthy Ireland 65 000 Mixed 8–10 S R R Kanner 4.3 (0.81) – –
22 1984 Gillberg Sweden 128 584 Mixed 4–18 P L P Rutter 2.0 (0.39) Rutter 3.9 (0.55)
23 1986 Steinhausen Germany 279 616 Urban 0–15 S L R Rutter 1.9 (0.26) – –
24 1986 Steffenburg Sweden 42 886 Mixed 0–9 P L P DSM-III 4.7 (1.05) DSM-III 6.9 (1.27)
25 1987 Burd USA 180 986 Mixed 2–18 C L P DSM-III 1.2 (0.26) DSM-III 3.3 (0.43)
26 1987 Matsuishi Japan 32 834 Urban 4–12 P R P DSM-III 15.5 (2.17) – –
27 1988 Tanoue Japan 95 394 Rural 7 P C P DSM-III 13.8 (1.20) – –
28 1988 Bryson Canada 20 800 Mixed 6–14 P Q P DSM-III 1.9 (0.96) Denkla Triad 10.1 (2.2)
29 1989 Ritvo USA 526 514 Mixed 3–17 P L P DSM-III 2.92 (0.24) – –
30 1989 Sugiyama Japan 11 320 Urban 1.5 P C P DSM-III 13.0 (3.37) – –
31 1989 Cialdella France 135 180 Urban 5–9 C L R DSM-III 5.1 (0.61) DSM-III 10.8 (0.89)
32 1991 Gillberg Sweden 78 102 Mixed 4–13 C L P DSM-III-R 7.0 (0.95) DSM-III-R 9.4 (1.1)
33 1992 Ohtaki Japan 35 366 Mixed 6–14 S R P DSM-III-R 13.9 (1.98) – –
34 1992 Fombonne France 274 816 Mixed 9 & 13 C R R ICD-9 4.9 (0.42) – –
35 1993 Herder Norway 50 909* – 1–17 C – – DSM-III-R 5.5 (1.04) – –
36 1996 Honda Japan 8 537 Urban 5 P C P ICD-10 21.1 (4.97) – –
37 1997 Arvidsson Sweden 1 941 Mixed 3–6 P C P ICD-10 31 (12.6) ICD-10 46 (15.36)
38 1997 Webb UK 73 300 Mixed 3–15 P L P DSM-III-R 7.2 (0.98) – –
39 1997 Fombonne France 325 347 Mixed 6–16 C R R ICD-10 5.35 (0.41) ICD-10 16.29 (0.71)
40 1998 Sponheim Norway 65 688 Mixed 3–14 P L P ICD-10 3.8 (0.76) ICD-10 5.2 (0.89)
41 1999 Kadesjo Sweden 826 Urban 6–7 P L P ICD-10 60 (26.87) Gillberg’s criteria 121 (38.04)
42 2000 Powell UK 16 049* Mixed 0 to ,5 S R R DSM-III-R or 16.2 (3.17) ICD-10 33.7 (1.48)
ICD-10**
43 2000 Kielinen Finland 152 732 Mixed 3–18 C R R ICD-10 5.6 (0.61) ICD-10 13.9 (0.95)
44 2000 Baird UK 16 235 Urban 1.5 P Q (CHAT) P ICD-10 30.8 (4.35) ICD-10 57.9 (5.95)
45 2001 Magnusson Iceland 43 153 Mixed 5–14` P C R ICD-10 8.6 (1.41) ICD-10 13.2 (1.75)
46 2001 Bertrand USA 8 896 Urban 3–10 P R P (where possible) DSM-IV 40.0 (6.69) DSM-IV 67 (8.65)
47 2001 Chakrabarti UK 15 500 Mixed 2.5–6.5 P C P DSM-IV 16.8 (3.29) DSM-IV 62.6 (6.34)
48 2002 Croen USA 4 590 333 Mixed 0–12 S R R DSM-III & 11.0 (0.15) – –
DSM-IV
49 2003 Lingam UK 186 206 Mixed 5–14 S R R ICD-10 14.9 (0.89) ICD-10 30.4 (1.28)
50 2004 Tebruegge UK 2 536 Mixed 8–9 P R R ICD-10 23.7 (9.7) ICD-10 82.8 (18.0)
ASD papers
51 2001 Fombonne UK 10 438 Mixed 5–15 P Q (DAWBA) P – – DSM-IV and ICD- 26.1 (5.0)
10 (excl Rett’s)
52 2002 Scott UK 43 472 Mixed 5–11 P L R – – ICD-10 57.0 (3.61)
53 2003 Yeargin-Allsopp USA 289 456 Urban 3–10 C R R – – DSM-IV 34 (1.08)
*Estimated from number of cases and prevalence estimate; Cohort first screened at 18 months, followed up until age 7–8 years; `Data from an older cohort also included in the study, but excluded from these analyses; 1Sample screened: P,
whole population; C, general clinical services; S, specialist clinical/educational services; Screen methods: C, routine checks; L, letter to elicit referrals; Q, questionnaires/interview; R, records (CHAT, Checklist for Autism in Toddlers; DAWBA,
Development and Well-Being Assessment); **ICD-10 used for analysis; DSM-IV used for analysis.
Williams, Higgins, Brayne
copyright.
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 11
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Study Study
copyright.
Croen, 2002 rise to higher prevalence estimates than studies carried out in
Lingam, 2003 rural or mixed locations (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.25;
Tebruegge, 2004 among-study variance explained = 53%). Studies that drew
on records of previous diagnostic assessments resulted in
lower prevalence estimates than those which included a
0.5 1 2.5 5 10 25 50 100 prospective diagnostic assessment (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.33 to
per 10 000 (log scale) 0.96; variance explained = 53%). Including region of study
provided the model that explained the most among-study
Figure 1 Forest plot of prevalence estimates and 95% confidence variance (variance explained = 61%) (table 3). In this final
intervals from studies of typical autism, log transformed (n = 37). model, using ICD-10 or DSM-IV led to prevalence estimates
three times those using other diagnostic criteria. The odds
information on study methodology was included in the ratio for age was 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.99), showing that an
English abstract of a Swedish paper.35 increase of one year in the age of the children screened led to
a significant reduction in prevalence estimates. For example,
Studies of typical autism when the odds ratio is taken to approximate a relative risk, if
The associations between study covariates and prevalence prevalence was estimated to be 10 per 10 000 in a sample of 5
estimates of typical autism from univariate meta-regression year olds, it would be expected to be around 9.1 per 10 000 in
analyses are shown in table 2. Taking account of the age of a sample of 6 year olds. Studies in Japan gave rise to
the children, for example, explained 23% of the among- prevalence estimates that were 3.6 times those in North
studies variance. America.
Diagnostic criteria and decade of publication were the
covariates that explained the most variance among studies in Studies of all ASD
the univariate analyses. These two covariates are collinear The associations between study covariates and prevalence
and it was not possible to include both in a multivariate estimates of all ASD from univariate meta-regression
model. The diagnostic criteria used were entered first into the analyses are shown in table 4. Only three covariates were
multivariate model since this was considered to be more significantly associated with the prevalence estimates: age of
directly related to variation in prevalence estimates than the children screened, urban or rural study location, and the
decade of publication, which is a proxy for all time varying diagnostic criteria used. The screen method used was of
covariates. The binary categorisation of diagnostic criteria borderline significance. Of these, diagnostic criteria explained
was used, as it was not possible to use multiple categories of most among-study variance, and was therefore included in
diagnostic criteria in a multivariate analysis with so few the multivariate analyses. Each of the other covariates was
studies. Age of the children screened also explained much introduced into the model in turn to form models with two
among-study variance, and was entered next into the model. covariates. As in the analyses of studies of typical autism, as
Models with three covariates were constructed which decade and diagnostic criteria were collinear, only the
included age, diagnostic criteria, and each remaining covariate for diagnostic criteria was included in further
covariate in turn. Screening method used, and whether the analyses. When adjusting for diagnostic criteria, the only
www.archdischild.com
12 Williams, Higgins, Brayne
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Table 2 Results of meta-regression of studies of typical autism, univariate analyses (n = 35)
Categories of covariate Variance
Covariate (first listed used as baseline) No. studies Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value t2 explained (%)
No covariates 35 – – – 0.98 –
Age Mid-point of age range 35 0.84 0.75 to 0.93 0.002 0.75 23
(continuous variable)
Decade 1960s and 1970s 3 1.00 – – 0.58 41
1980s 14 1.80 0.68 to 4.81 0.24
1990s 9 4.26 1.52 to 11.94 0.006
2000s 9 6.42 2.29 to 17.99 ,0.001
Region* N. America 6 1.00 – – 0.85 13
Japan 7 3.19 1.14 to 8.94 0.03
Europe and Scandinavia 22 2.05 0.87 to 4.85 0.10
Area Rural/mixed 24 1.00 – – 0.86 12
Urban 11 2.10 1.07 to 4.14 0.03
Sample screened Population based 21 1.00 – – 0.88 10
Clinic based 14 0.54 0.28 to 1.03 0.06
Screen method Routine checks 6 1.00 – – 0.77 21
Letter for referrals 13 0.28 0.12 to 0.68 0.005
Questionnaires 3 0.45 0.13 to 1.62 0.22
Records 13 0.53 0.22 to 1.27 0.16
Assessment Prospective 23 1.00 – – 0.95 3
Retrospective 12 0.73 0.37 to 1.46 0.38
Diagnostic criterion 1 Not ICD-10 or DSM-IV 21 1.00 – – 0.64 35
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 14 3.32 1.89 to 5.81 ,0.001
Diagnostic criterion 2 Kanner 5 1.00 – – 0.54 45
Rutter 4 1.38 0.51 to 3.71 0.53
DSM-III 8 1.95 0.84 to 4.57 0.12
DSM-III-R 3 3.29 1.13 to 9.58 0.03
ICD-9 1 1.82 0.37 to 8.85 0.46
ICD-10 11 5.10 2.29 to 11.47 ,0.001
DSM-IV 3 7.17 2.46 to 20.91 ,0.001
*Region = North America: USA and Canada; Japan; Europe (UK, France, Germany, Ireland) and Scandinavia (Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland).
Sample screened = whole population versus clinic based (general clinical services and clinic specialist services).
copyright.
Covariate Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value
*As an example, to estimate the prevalence of typical autism in 8 year old European children using ICD-10, take
10 0006(x/(1+x)), where x = 5.156102463.3660.91861.67, that is, a prevalence of 13.6 per 10 000.
covariates that were significantly associated with the and 20.0 per 10 000 for all ASD are slightly lower than those
prevalence estimates were the age of the children screened estimated previously at 8.7–10.0 per 10 000 and 27.5 per
(variance explained = 50%) and urban or rural study location 10 000 respectively.1 3
(variance explained = 53%). Both these models are presented The covariate most strongly associated with prevalence
(table 5). Using ICD-10 or DSM-IV gave rise to prevalence estimates for typical autism and all ASD was the diagnostic
estimates that were over twice those in studies using other criteria used. This association has been recognised pre-
diagnostic criteria. When including age in the model, an viously.2–4 The time variation in prevalence is so closely
increase in the age of the sample by one year was associated linked to changes in diagnostic criteria, the two could not be
with a fall in prevalence by a factor of approximately 0.85, examined separately. Furthermore, it was not possible to
taking the odds ratio as an approximation of a relative risk. account entirely for the effect of the diagnostic criteria on the
Alternatively, when including study location, studies in prevalence estimates as the ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnostic
urban areas gave rise to prevalence estimates over 2.5 times schema leave some scope for variation in their interpretation
those in rural or mixed urban and rural areas. and application.
The age of the children screened was strongly associated
DISCUSSION with the prevalence estimates. Manifestations of ASD may be
Main findings more obvious in younger children. Alternatively, some
As expected, a large amount of variation in prevalence across screening methods may be more sensitive for younger
studies was found by graphical representation of estimates children. Methods of screening were found to be significantly
and by indices of heterogeneity. Despite this wide variation, associated with the prevalence estimates in the univariate
pooled estimates are useful to indicate the public health analyses of typical autism, but not after adjusting for the age
burden of the disorder. The study variation is reflected in the of the children screened.
very large intervals on the summaries of overall prevalence. The multivariate model that explained most among-study
The estimates of around 7.1 per 10 000 for typical autism, variance in studies of typical autism included the region
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 13
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
Table 4 Results of meta-regression of studies of all autism spectrum disorders, univariate analyses (n = 23)
Categories of covariate Variance
Covariate* (first listed used as baseline) No. studies Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value t2 explained (%)
No covariates 23 1.01
Age Mid-point of age range 23 0.82 0.72 to 0.94 0.005 0.74 27
(continuous variable)
Decade 1960s and 1970s 1 1.00 – – 0.43 57
1980s 6 0.29 0.07 to 1.19 0.09
1990s 5 0.93 0.22 to 3.94 0.92
2000s 11 1.75 0.44 to 6.89 0.42
Region N. America 4 1.00 – – 0.77 24
Japan 0 – – – – –
Europe 10 1.99 0.70 to 5.58 0.19
Scandinavia 9 0.72 0.25 to 2.05 0.54
Area Rural/mixed 17 1.00 – – 0.86 15
Urban 6 2.44 1.02 to 5.81 0.05
Sample screened Population based 14 1.00 – – 0.97 4
Clinic based 9 0.66 0.29 to 1.54 0.34
Screen method Routine checks 3 1.00 – – 0.72 29
Letter for referrals 9 0.31 0.10 to 0.98 0.05
Questionnaires 3 0.76 0.19 to 3.03 0.69
Records 8 0.93 0.30 to 2.97 0.91
Assessment Prospective 14 1.00 – – 0.96 5
Retrospective 9 1.52 0.66 to 3.49 0.32
Diagnostic criterion 1 Not ICD-10 or DSM-IV 9 1.00 – – 0.69 32
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 14 3.08 1.52 to 6.25 0.002
*Too few studies relative to the number of categories in diagnostic criterion 2 (criteria separately) were available to include this covariate in the analysis.
Table 5 Two multivariate meta-regression models for studies of all autism spectrum
disorders (n = 23)
Covariate Odds ratio 95% CI (odds ratio) p value
copyright.
ICD-10 or DSM-IV 2.61 1.40 to 4.85 0.003
Age (years) 0.85 0.85 0.76 to 0.96 0.006
Intercept 1.4561023 1.4561023 3.2561024 to 6.4561023 ,0.001
studied, with studies from Japan having significantly higher method relied on records, these may have been more
estimates than North American studies. This could be due to complete in urban locations. If the screen method used
other study factors. For example, a higher proportion of the referrals from clinicians, it is possible that a higher
Japanese studies were from urban areas (4/7 (57%) studies) proportion of children were known to services in urban
compared to those in North America (1/6 (17%) studies). All locations. There may have been different diagnostic practices
the Japanese studies used prospective diagnostic assess- in urban locations where staff were more likely to be
ments, and all but one drew on whole population rather than employed at specialist healthcare centres than in rural
clinical samples. Due to the imposed limit of three covariates locations. It is easier to access the population in urban
in the model, it was not possible to adjust for further locations, and response rates may have been higher, but data
potential effect modifiers. Countries differ in their diagnostic on response were too limited to investigate this.
practice both in their theoretical background and their
training procedures for healthcare workers. This may, in Limitations and recommendations for future research
part, account for between-region variation in prevalence. Publication bias was not investigated in this review, as funnel
In an alternative model for typical autism, when adjusting plots were not considered appropriate due to the large degree
for age and diagnostic criteria, studies including prospective of variation across studies. It is unlikely that the set of papers
diagnostic assessments gave rise to higher prevalence published is biased with respect to prevalence reported.
estimates than those using retrospective records. This may However, it is possible that some studies were not identified
be linked to the use of different diagnostic methodology at in the searches if they were not published in mainstream
different times. Alternatively, an assessor taking part in journals. There may have been some time lag bias, with
prospective research studies might observe children more smaller studies, or studies with unremarkable results, coming
closely for symptoms of ASD. through to publication slower than larger studies.
When adjusting for diagnostic criteria, urban location was Of the papers identified for detailed examination, five
also observed to be associated with higher prevalence potentially eligible studies were excluded as they did not have
estimates for both typical autism and all ASD. If the screen a detailed English summary or were not peer reviewed. There
www.archdischild.com
14 Williams, Higgins, Brayne
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
is no reason to suspect that the lack of availability of data 6 Gillberg C, Wing L. Autism: not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatr
Scand 1999;99:399–406.
from these studies is a direct consequence of the prevalences 7 Wing L. The definition and prevalence of autism: a review. European Child
they might have observed. and Adolescent Psychiatry 1993;2:61–74.
The choice of coding of the covariates may have affected 8 Lewis S, Clarke M. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ
2001;322:1479–80.
the model, such as using the midpoint of the age range or 9 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-
grouping diverse diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, it was only analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.
possible to assess the impact of reported covariates, or easily 10 Whitehead A, Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-
analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 1991;10:1665–77.
quantifiable covariates. Qualitative influences on prevalence
11 Goodman SN. Meta-analysis and evidence. Control Clin Trials
such as awareness of autism in each population could not be 1989;10:188–204.
included. As more studies are published, it may be possible to 12 Sharp S. Meta-analysis regression. Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints
include new covariates or more precise coding of existing 2003;7(STB42):148–55.
13 Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall,
covariates in such a model. It would be valuable to have even 1991:349.
more thorough recording of study characteristics in future 14 Lotter V. Epidemiology of autistic conditions in young children. Social
studies to facilitate meta-analyses of studies. Psychiatry 1966;1:124–37.
15 Treffert DA. Epidemiology of infantile autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry
It is unlikely that it would ever be possible to measure and 1970;22:431–8.
record all potentially important covariates. An alternative 16 Brask BH. A prevalence investigation of childhood psychoses. Nordic
approach to investigating trends in prevalence, through symposium on the care of psychotic children. Oslo: Barnepsychiatrist
Forening, Universitetsforlagets Trykningssentral, 1970.
ongoing monitoring of defined school aged populations using
17 Wing L, Gould J. Severe impairments of social interaction and associated
standard methodology, has been recommended.1 This would abnormalities in children: epidemiology and classification. J Autism Dev
enable researchers to investigate changes in prevalence over Disord 1979;9:11–29.
time, and geographical variations while controlling for study 18 Hoshino Y, Kumashiro H, Yashima Y, et al. The epidemiological study of
autism in Fukushima-ken. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn 1982;36:115–24.
methodology. 19 Ishii T, Takahashi O. The epidemiology of autistic children in Toyota, Japan:
prevalence. Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
1983;24:311–21.
Conclusions 20 Bohman M, Bohman IL, Bjorck PO, et al. Childhood psychosis in a northern
This review has contributed to explaining some of the Swedish county: some preliminary findings from an epidemiological survey.
influences on variation among prevalence estimates. Over In: Schmidt M, Schmidt R, eds. Epidemiological approaches in child
psychiatry. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag, 1983:164–73.
half of the variation among study estimates can be explained 21 McCarthy P, Fitzgerald M, Smith MA. Prevalence of childhood autism in
by the age of the children screened, the diagnostic criteria Ireland. Ir Med J 1984;77:129–30.
used, and the country studied. Other important factors were 22 Gillberg C. Infantile autism and other childhood psychoses in a Swedish
urban region. Epidemiological aspects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
whether the study was in a rural or urban location and 1984;25:35–43.
whether cases were assessed prospectively or retrospectively. 23 Steinhausen HC, Gobel D, Breinlinger M, et al. A community survey of
The impact of these identified factors on prevalence estimates infantile autism. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1986;25:186–9.
24 Steffenburg S, Gillberg C. Autism and autistic-like conditions in Swedish rural
should now be further investigated as they may be acting as
copyright.
and urban areas: a population study. Br J Psychiatry 1986;149:81–7.
proxies for other influences on prevalence. For example, the 25 Burd L, Fisher W, Kerbeshian J. A prevalence study of pervasive
effect of geographical location on prevalence may be due to developmental disorders in North Dakota. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
the services available, or variation in awareness of the Psychiatry 1987;26:700–3.
26 Matsuishi T, Shiotsuki Y, Yoshimura K, et al. High prevalence of infantile
disorder. By taking this quantitative approach, this review autism in Kurume City, Japan. J Child Neurol 1987;2:268–71.
has shown that using meta-analytic techniques can be a 27 Tanoue Y, Oda S, Asano F, et al. Epidemiology of infantile autism in southern
valuable additional tool in deepening our understanding of Ibaraki, Japan: differences in prevalence in birth cohorts. J Autism Dev Disord
1988;18:155–66.
the influences of study and population characteristics on 28 Bryson SE, Clark BS, Smith IM. First report of a Canadian epidemiological
variation in prevalence estimates in autism spectrum study of autistic syndromes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1988;29:433–45.
disorders. 29 Ritvo ER, Freeman BJ, Pingree C, et al. The UCLA–University of Utah
epidemiologic survey of autism: prevalence. Am J Psychiatry
1989;146:194–9.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 30 Sugiyama T, Abe T. The prevalence of autism in Nagoya, Japan: a total
This work forms part of a PhD thesis entitled ‘‘Screening for autism population study. J Autism Dev Disord 1989;19:87–96.
spectrum disorders’’ (University of Cambridge, 2003). Jo Williams 31 Cialdella P, Mamelle N. An epidemiological study of infantile autism in a
(née Johnson) held an MRC studentship, and subsequently received French department (Rhone): a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
1989;30:165–75.
funding from the Shirley Foundation. We wish to thank Prof Patrick
32 Gillberg C, Steffenburg S, Schaumann H. Is autism more common now than
Bolton and Prof Simon Baron-Cohen for their comments on an ten years ago? Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:403–9.
earlier draft of this paper. 33 Ohtaki E, Kawano Y, Urabe F, et al. The prevalence of Rett syndrome and
infantile autism in Chikugo District, the southwestern area of Fukuoka
..................... prefecture, Japan [letter]. J Autism Dev Disord 1992;22:452–4.
34 Fombonne E, du Mazaubrun C. Prevalence of infantile autism in four French
Authors’ affiliations regions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1992;27:203–10.
J G Williams, C E G Brayne, Department of Public Health and Primary 35 Herder GA. [Infantile autism among children in the county of Nordland.
Care, University of Cambridge, UK Prevalence and etiology]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1993;113:2247–9.
J P T Higgins, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK and Public Health 36 Honda H, Shimizu Y, Misumi K, et al. Cumulative incidence and prevalence of
Genetics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK childhood autism in children in Japan. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169:228–35.
37 Arvidsson T, Danielsson B, Forsberg P, et al. Autism in 3-6-year-old children
Competing interests: none declared in a suburb of Goteborg, Sweden. Autism 1997;1:163–73.
38 Webb EV, Lobo S, Hervas A, et al. The changing prevalence of autistic
disorder in a Welsh health district. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:150–2.
39 Fombonne E, du Mazaubrun C, Cans C, et al. Autism and associated medical
REFERENCES disorders in a French epidemiological survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
1 Fombonne E. Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive Psychiatry 1997;36:1561–9.
developmental disorders: an update. J Autism Dev Disord 2003;33:365–82. 40 Sponheim E, Skjeldal O. Autism and related disorders: epidemiological
2 Wing L, Potter D. The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: is the findings in a Norwegian study using ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. J Autism Dev
prevalence rising? Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Disord 1998;28:217–27.
Research Review 2002;8:151–61. 41 Kadesjo B, Gillberg C, Hagberg B. Brief report: autism and Asperger
3 Fombonne E. Epidemiological trends in rates of autism. Mol Psychiatry syndrome in seven-year-old children: a total population study. J Autism Dev
2002;7(suppl 2):S4–6. Disord 1999;29:327–31.
4 Charman T. The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders. Recent evidence 42 Powell JE, Edwards A, Edwards M, et al. Changes in the incidence of
and future challenges. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;11:249–56. childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders in preschool children
5 Fombonne E. The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychol Med from two areas of the West Midlands, UK. Dev Med Child Neurol
1999;29:769–86. 2000;42:624–8.
www.archdischild.com
Prevalence studies of autism spectrum disorders 15
Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.2004.062083 on 29 April 2005. Downloaded from http://adc.bmj.com/ on October 10, 2021 at UK NHS and HE Athens Access. Protected by
43 Kielinen M, Linna SL, Moilanen I. Autism in Northern Finland. Eur Child 49 Lingam R, Simmons A, Andrews N, et al. Prevalence of autism and parentally
Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;9:162–7. reported triggers in a north east London population. Arch Dis Child
44 Baird G, Charman T, Baron-Cohen S, et al. A screening instrument for autism 2003;88:666–70.
at 18 months of age: a 6-year follow- up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc 50 Tebruegge M, Nandini V, Ritchie J. Does routine child health surveillance
Psychiatry 2000;39:694–702. contribute to the early detection of children with pervasive developmental
45 Magnusson P, Saemundsen E. Prevalence of autism in Iceland. J Autism Dev disorders? An epidemiological study in Kent, U.K. BMC Pediatr 2004;4:4.
Disord 2001;31:153–63. 51 Fombonne E, Simmons H, Ford T, et al. Prevalence of pervasive
46 Bertrand J, Mars A, Boyle C, et al. Prevalence of autism in a United States developmental disorders in the British nationwide survey of child mental
population: the Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation. Pediatrics health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:820–7.
2001;108:1155–61. 52 Scott F, Baron-Cohen S, Bolton P, et al. Brief report: prevalence of autism
47 Chakrabarti S, Fombonne E. Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool spectrum conditions in children aged 5–11 years in Cambridgeshire, UK.
children. JAMA 2001;285:3093–9. Autism 2002;6:231–7.
48 Croen LA, Grether JK, Hoogstrate J, et al. The changing prevalence of autism 53 Yeargin-Allsopp M, Rice C, Karapurkar T, et al. Prevalence of autism in a US
in California. J Autism Dev Disord 2002;32:207–15. metropolitan area. JAMA 2003;289:49–55.
copyright.
Being a contributor involves:
N Selecting from a validated, screened search (performed by in-house Information
Specialists) epidemiologically sound studies for inclusion.
N Documenting your decisions about which studies to include on an inclusion and exclusion
form, which we keep on file.
N Writing the text to a highly structured template (about 1500-3000 words), using evidence
from the final studies chosen, within 8-10 weeks of receiving the literature search.
N Working with Clinical Evidence editors to ensure that the final text meets epidemiological
and style standards.
N Updating the text every 12 months using any new, sound evidence that becomes available.
The Clinical Evidence in-house team will conduct the searches for contributors; your task is
simply to filter out high quality studies and incorporate them in the existing text.
If you would like to become a contributor for Clinical Evidence or require more information
about what this involves please send your contact details and a copy of your CV, clearly
stating the clinical area you are interested in, to CECommissioning@bmjgroup.com.
Clinical Evidence also needs to recruit a number of new peer reviewers specifically with an
interest in the clinical areas stated above, and also others related to general practice. Peer
reviewers are healthcare professionals or epidemiologists with experience in evidence-based
medicine. As a peer reviewer you would be asked for your views on the clinical relevance,
validity, and accessibility of specific topics within the journal, and their usefulness to the
intended audience (international generalists and healthcare professionals, possibly with
limited statistical knowledge). Topics are usually 1500-3000 words in length and we would
ask you to review between 2-5 topics per year. The peer review process takes place
throughout the year, and out turnaround time for each review is ideally 10-14 days.
If you are interested in becoming a peer reviewer for Clinical Evidence, please complete the
peer review questionnaire at www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/contribute/peerreviewer.jsp
www.archdischild.com